Literature DB >> 30078152

Model checking for trigger loss detection during Doppler ultrasound-guided fetal cardiovascular MRI.

Sven-Thomas Antoni1, Sascha Lehmann2, Maximilian Neidhardt3, Kai Fehrs4, Christian Ruprecht4, Fabian Kording4, Gerhard Adam4, Sibylle Schupp2, Alexander Schlaefer3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ultrasound (US) is the state of the art in prenatal diagnosis to depict fetal heart diseases. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) has been proposed as a complementary diagnostic tool. Currently, only trigger-based methods allow the temporal and spatial resolutions necessary to depict the heart over time. Of these methods, only Doppler US (DUS)-based triggering is usable with higher field strengths. DUS is sensitive to motion. This may lead to signal and, ultimately, trigger loss. If too many triggers are lost, the image acquisition is stopped, resulting in a failed imaging sequence. Moreover, losing triggers may prolong image acquisition. Hence, if no actual trigger can be found, injected triggers are added to the signal based on the trigger history.
METHOD: We use model checking, a technique originating from the computer science domain that formally checks if a model satisfies given requirements, to simultaneously model heart and respiratory motion and to decide whether respiration has a prominent effect on the signal. Using bounds on the physiological parameters and their variability, the method detects when changes in the signal are due to respiration. We use this to decide when to inject a trigger.
RESULTS: In a real-world scenario, we can reduce the number of falsely injected triggers by 94% from more than 87% to less than 5%. On a subset of motion that would allow CMRI, the number can be further reduced to below 0.2%. In a study using simulations with a robot, we show that our method works for different types of motions, motion ranges, starting positions and heartbeat traces.
CONCLUSION: While DUS is a promising approach for fetal CMRI, correct trigger injection is critical. Our model checking method can reduce the number of wrongly injected triggers substantially, providing a key prerequisite for fast and artifact free CMRI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular; Fetal; Heart; MRI; Model checking; Triggering

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30078152     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-018-1832-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of fetal heart dimensions from 12 weeks to term.

Authors:  C Firpo; J I Hoffman; N H Silverman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Metric optimized gating for fetal cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Michael S Jansz; Mike Seed; Joshua F P van Amerom; Derek Wong; Lars Grosse-Wortmann; Shi-Joon Yoo; Christopher K Macgowan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Influence of the trigger technique on ventricular function measurements using 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of ECG versus pulse wave triggering.

Authors:  Burkhard Sievers; Marco Wiesner; Nino Kiria; Uwe Speiser; Steffen Schoen; Ruth H Strasser
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Advances in real-time phase-contrast flow MRI using asymmetric radial gradient echoes.

Authors:  Markus Untenberger; Zhengguo Tan; Dirk Voit; Arun A Joseph; Volkert Roeloffs; K Dietmar Merboldt; Sebastian Schätz; Jens Frahm
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Multivariate respiratory motion prediction.

Authors:  R Dürichen; T Wissel; F Ernst; A Schlaefer; A Schweikard
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Online model checking for monitoring surrogate-based respiratory motion tracking in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Sven-Thomas Antoni; Jonas Rinast; Xintao Ma; Sibylle Schupp; Alexander Schlaefer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 7.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and its electrocardiographs (ECG): tips and tricks.

Authors:  Marcelo Souto Nacif; Anna Zavodni; Nadine Kawel; Eui-Young Choi; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Three-dimensional cine MRI in free-breathing infants and children with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Achim Seeger; Michael C Fenchel; Gerald F Greil; Petros Martirosian; Ulrich Kramer; Christiane Bretschneider; Joerg Doering; Claus D Claussen; Ludger Sieverding; Stephan Miller
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-10-02

Review 9.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance artefacts.

Authors:  Pedro F Ferreira; Peter D Gatehouse; Raad H Mohiaddin; David N Firmin
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Fetal electrocardiogram (fECG) gated MRI.

Authors:  Martyn N J Paley; Janet E Morris; Debbie Jarvis; Paul D Griffiths
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.576

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative analysis of fetal magnetic resonance phantoms and recommendations for an anthropomorphic motion phantom.

Authors:  Michael Shulman; Eunyoung Cho; Bipin Aasi; Jin Cheng; Saiee Nithiyanantham; Nicole Waddell; Dafna Sussman
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.310

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.