Literature DB >> 30077835

Characteristics of the ablation lesions in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging after radiofrequency ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in relation to the procedural success.

Borislav Dinov1, Sabrina Oebel2, Sebastian Hilbert2, Susanne Loebe2, Arash Arya2, Andreas Bollmann2, Philipp Sommer2, Cosima Jahnke2, Ingo Paetsch2, Gerhard Hindricks2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In human patients, studies about the cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) appearance of the acute radiofrequency (RF) lesions in relation to the procedural outcomes after catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are scarce. We aimed to investigate the RF lesions characteristics in relation to the procedural success.
METHODS: Patients referred for ablation of VA received CMR (1.5 T) using gadolinium contrast before and after ablation. CA in left ventricle was performed using a 3.5-mm irrigated catheter. The volume and transmurality of the RF-induced lesions were measured in early gadolinium-enhanced postablation CMRs. Acute failure was defined as persistently inducible VA at the end of the CA.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (60.7 ± 9.8 years, 19 with sustained ventricular tachycardia) were studied. All RF lesions had nonenhanced core. The volume of the nonenhanced lesions showed positive correlation with the maximal RF power (r = 0.598, P = .002) and the impedance drop (r = 0.416, P = .038). Patients with transmural (≥75%) lesions had significantly larger impedance drop as compared to those with nontransmural lesions (<75%): 20.3 ± 9.4 versus 13.5 ± 4.3, P = .037. In the failures, the lesions volume was nonsignificantly larger: 3.86 ± 3.3% versus 2.6 ± 1.7%, P = .197; however, it was considerably deeper: 86 ± 13% versus 62 ± 26%, P = .03.
CONCLUSIONS: CMR after VA ablation showed nonenhanced lesions resembling the no-reflow phenomenon in myocardial infarction. Although the size and the depth of the RF injury correlated with the ablation energy and impedance drop, they were not associated with acute ablation success.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30077835     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  2 in total

Review 1.  [Benefits of cardiac magnetic resonance diagnostics in patients with heart rhythm disorders : From risk stratification to interventional procedures].

Authors:  S Oebel; C Jahnke; G Hindricks; I Paetsch
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  The challenge of optimising ablation lesions in catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Riccardo Proietti; Luca Lichelli; Nicolas Lellouche; Tarvinder Dhanjal
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2020-12-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.