Literature DB >> 30077468

Rapid Recovery Total Joint Arthroplasty is Safe, Efficient, and Cost-Effective in the Veterans Administration Setting.

John M Yanik1, Nicholas A Bedard1, Jessica M Hanley1, Jesse E Otero1, John J Callaghan1, John L Marsh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Institutional pathways in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have been shown to reduce costs and improve patient care, but questions remain regarding their efficacy in certain populations. We sought to evaluate the comprehensive effect of a rapid recovery perioperative TJA protocol in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) setting.
METHODS: In a VA hospital, a rapid recovery protocol was implemented for all patients undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasty. A retrospective chart review was performed comparing pre-protocol (n = 174) and protocol (n = 78) cohorts. Measured outcomes included length of stay (LOS), discharge destination, unplanned readmissions, overall complications, and total cost of healthcare during admission and at 30 and 90 days postoperatively.
RESULTS: After implementation of the protocol, the average LOS decreased from 3.2 to 1.7 days (P < .0001). In the protocol group, there was a 12.3% increase in patients discharging directly home (85.1% vs 97.4%, P = .005). There were lower unplanned readmissions (6.3% vs 3.8%, P = .56) and overall complications (7.5% vs 3.8%, P = .40), but these were not statistically significant. The summative cost of all perioperative healthcare was lower after implementation of the protocol during the inpatient stay ($19,015 vs $21,719, P = .002) and out to 30 days postoperatively ($21,083 vs $23,420, P = .03) and 90 days postoperatively ($24,189 vs $26,514, P = .07).
CONCLUSION: In the VA setting, implementation of a rapid recovery TJA protocol led to decreased LOS, decreased cost of perioperative healthcare, and an increase in patients discharging directly home without increased readmission or complication rates. Such protocols are essential as we transition into an era of value-based arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; cost; fast track; rapid recovery; readmission; veteran

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30077468     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  13 in total

Review 1.  Economic analyses of fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthias Büttner; Anica M Mayer; Britta Büchler; Ulrich Betz; Philipp Drees; Singer Susanne
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-11

2.  Preoperative Home Care Can Be One of the Factors Affecting the Length of Hospital Stay in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Júlia B M Chagas; Tássio N Andrez; Lauro A V Costa; Isabela D Paião; Mario Lenza; Mario Ferreti
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 1.251

3.  Same-day discharge to home is feasible and safe in up to 75% of unselected total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nicolas Verdier; Benoît Boutaud; Patrick Ragot; Pierre Leroy; Mo Saffarini; Luca Nover; Jérôme Magendie
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  Spinal Anesthesia Using Chloroprocaine is Safe, Effective, and Facilitates Earlier Discharge in Selected Fast-track Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Carl L Herndon; Roxana Martinez; Nana O Sarpong; Jeffrey A Geller; Roshan P Shah; H John Cooper
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-06-01

5.  Successful Implementation of an Accelerated Recovery and Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty Program at a County Hospital.

Authors:  Blake J Schultz; Nicole Segovia; Tiffany N Castillo
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2019-09-20

6.  Risk factors for femoral fracture in lateral decubitus direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty using conventional stems: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Guanjun Sun; Yi Yin; Yongjie Ye; Qingshan Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Rapid Recovery Is Feasible for Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty at an Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Josef Pontasch; Mario Sahlani; Sumon Nandi
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-01-15

8.  Ideal intraarticular application dose of tranexamic acid in primary total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized and controlled study.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Yi-Qin Zhou; Jian-Hua Deng; Ya-Guang Han; Yu-Chang Zhu; Qi-Rong Qian
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-11

9.  Outpatient vs. inpatient hip arthroplasty: a matched case-control study on a 90-day complication rate and 2-year patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Philip J Rosinsky; Sarah L Chen; Mitchell J Yelton; Ajay C Lall; David R Maldonado; Jacob Shapira; Mitchell B Meghpara; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Outpatient Mastectomy: Factors Influencing Patient Selection and Predictors of Return to Care.

Authors:  Brooke Vuong; Jennifer R Dusendang; Sharon B Chang; Margaret Ann Mentakis; Veronica C Shim; Julie Schmittdiel; Gillian Kuehner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 6.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.