Literature DB >> 30077401

Stakeholder engagement in the study and management of invasive alien species.

Ross T Shackleton1, Tim Adriaens2, Giuseppe Brundu3, Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz4, Rodrigo A Estévez5, Jana Fried4, Brendon M H Larson6, Shuang Liu7, Elizabete Marchante8, Hélia Marchante9, Moleseng C Moshobane10, Ana Novoa11, Mark Reed12, David M Richardson13.   

Abstract

Invasive alien species are a major driver of global environmental change and a range of management interventions are needed to manage their effects on biodiversity, ecosystem services, human well-being and local livelihoods. Stakeholder engagement is widely advocated to integrate diverse knowledge and perspectives in the management of invasive species and to deal with potential conflicts of interest. We reviewed the literature in the ISI Web of Science on stakeholder engagement (the process of involving stakeholders (actors) in decision making, management actions and knowledge creation) in invasion science to assess and understand what has been done (looking at approaches and methodologies used, stakeholders involved, and outcomes from engagement) and to make recommendations for future work. Research on stakeholder engagement in invasion science has increased over the last decade, helping to improve scientific knowledge and contributing towards policy formulation and co-implementation of management. However, many challenges remain and engagement could be made more effective. For example, most studies engage only one stakeholder group passively using questionnaires, primarily for assessing local knowledge and perceptions. Although useful for management and policy planning, these stakeholders are not active participants and there is no two-way flow of knowledge. To make stakeholder involvement more useful, we encourage more integrative and collaborative engagement to (1) improve co-design, co-creation and co-implementation of research and management actions; (2) promote social learning and provide feedback to stakeholders; (3) enhance collaboration and partnerships beyond the natural sciences and academia (interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary collaboration); and (4) discuss some practical and policy suggestions for improving stakeholder engagement in invasion science research and management. This will help facilitate different stakeholders to work better together, allowing problems associated with biological invasions to be tackled more holistically and successfully.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological invasions; Collaboration; Environmental management; Global review; Human dimensions; Natural resource management; Participation; Social-ecological systems

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30077401     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  10 in total

Review 1.  Maintenance management and eradication of established aquatic invaders.

Authors:  Daniel Simberloff
Journal:  Hydrobiologia       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.822

2.  Risk management options to contrast the introduction of citrus fruit bacterial canker through ornamental Rutaceae in the Mediterranean Basin: An Italian case study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Timpanaro; Arturo Urso; Alessandro Scuderi; Vera Teresa Foti
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-02-06

3.  Guiding restoration of riparian ecosystems degraded by plant invasions: Insights from a complex social-ecological system in the Global South.

Authors:  Nicola S du Plessis; Alanna J Rebelo; David M Richardson; Karen J Esler
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Of Fears and Budgets: Strategies of Control in Vespa velutina Invasion and Lessons for Best Management Practices.

Authors:  Tamara Pazos; Patricia Álvarez-Figueiró; Jose A Cortés-Vázquez; María Amalia Jácome; María J Servia
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.644

5.  Do People Care about the Origin of Wildlife? The Role of Social Stereotypes on Public Preference for Exotic Animals.

Authors:  Rocío Alejandra Díaz; Verónica Sevillano; Marcelo Hernán Cassini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  An expert-based risk ranking framework for assessing potential pathogens in the live baitfish trade.

Authors:  Margaret C McEachran; Fernando Sampedro; Dominic A Travis; Nicholas B D Phelps
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 4.521

7.  Global Actions for Managing Cactus Invasions.

Authors:  Ana Novoa; Giuseppe Brundu; Michael D Day; Vicente Deltoro; Franz Essl; Llewellyn C Foxcroft; Guillaume Fried; Haylee Kaplan; Sabrina Kumschick; Sandy Lloyd; Elizabete Marchante; Hélia Marchante; Iain D Paterson; Petr Pyšek; David M Richardson; Arne Witt; Helmuth G Zimmermann; John R U Wilson
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-16

8.  Managing human-mediated range shifts: understanding spatial, temporal and genetic variation in marine non-native species.

Authors:  Luke E Holman; Shirley Parker-Nance; Mark de Bruyn; Simon Creer; Gary Carvalho; Marc Rius
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 6.671

9.  The educational community and its knowledge and perceptions of native and invasive alien species.

Authors:  Alejandro J Sosa; Nadia L Jiménez; Ana C Faltlhauser; Tomás Righetti; Fernando Mc Kay; Octavio A Bruzzone; Iris Stiers; Adriana Fernández Souto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Public Awareness and Perceptions of Invasive Alien Species in Small Towns.

Authors:  Nolwethu Jubase; Ross T Shackleton; John Measey
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.