| Literature DB >> 30077182 |
Zi Ye1, Ni Zhang1, Chunyan Wu2, Xinyuan Zhang3, Qingfeng Wang1, Xinyue Huang1, Liping Du1, Qingfeng Cao1, Jihong Tang1, Chunjiang Zhou1, Shengping Hou1, Yue He1, Qian Xu2,4, Xiao Xiong2, Aize Kijlstra5, Nan Qin2,6, Peizeng Yang7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Behcet's disease (BD) is a recalcitrant, multisystemic inflammatory disease that can lead to irreversible blindness. Microbial agents have been considered to contribute to the pathogenesis of this disease, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the association of gut microbiome composition with BD as well as its possible roles in the development of this disease.Entities:
Keywords: Behcet’s disease; Fecal microbiota transplant; Gut microbiome; Metagenomic analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30077182 PMCID: PMC6091101 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-018-0520-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Fig. 1Phyla (a), genera (b), and species (c) showing significant differences in fecal metagenome profiles when comparing BD patients with healthy controls. Differentially abundant phylotypes were identified by Wilcoxon rank sum test (FDR < 0.1, corrected by the Benjamini and Hochberg for multiple comparisons). Only the top 5 phyla and top 10 genera are shown. The phylotypes enriched in healthy group are colored red. The relative abundance was shown by boxplot. Boxes represent the inter quartile ranges, lines inside the boxes denote medians, and ‘+’ denotes means
Fig. 2Linear discrimination analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) analysis results comparing the BD and healthy groups. a Histogram of the LDA scores computed for genera differentially abundant between BD subjects and healthy controls. The LDA scores (log10) > 2 are listed. b SparCC network plot of co-abundance and co-exclusion correlations between differentially abundant SRB, BPB, methanogens, and opportunistic pathogens. Each node represents one species, and two nodes are linked if the correlation was significant (two-sided pseudo p ≤ 0.1 based on bootstrapping of 100 repetitions). Lines between nodes show positive correlations (solid lines) or negative correlations (dashed lines). The node size is proportional to the mean relative abundance of species in the enriched population. Nodes were colored as follows: orange, sulfate-reducing bacteria; purple, lactate-producing bacteria; blue, butyrate-producing bacteria; green, methanogens
Fig. 3MGSs analysis. a The heatmap of 25 ‘tracer’ genes abundance for each MGS were shown. Individuals are represented along the horizontal axis. Abundance of genes in rows is indicated by color gradient (white, not detected), and the enrichment significance is shown on the right with P value by Wilcoxon test. b The relative importance of each MGS in the predictive random forest model using the mean decreasing accuracy. c Relationship between the numbers of MGSs included in random forest model and the corresponding predictive performance (estimated by 10-fold cross-validation). d The ROC curve for the random forest model using 13 MGSs
Fig. 4Effect of transplantation of feces from BD patients on EAU. Pooled feces from active BD patients transferred to B10RIII mice by oral gavage. Pooled feces from healthy individuals and PBS were transferred to mice as control groups. EAU was induced by immunization with IRBP161–180. On day 14 after EAU induction, clinical and histological scores of BD patients’ feces-treated group (a and d), healthy’ feces-treated group (b and e), and PBS-treated group (c and f) were determined. Combined data in (g) for clinical score and (h) for histological score. Each point represents an individual eye. The horizontal bars denote the average scores of each group. The spleens were also removed from EAU mice on day 14 after induction. IFN-γ (i) and IL-17 (j) mRNA levels were evaluated by real-time PCR
Fig. 5Chart of possible mechanisms explaining the relation between gut microbiome composition and development of Behcet’s disease. a Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome might be caused via dietary intake in individuals carrying the susceptibility genes for BD. The dysbiosis of the gut microbiome in BD is characterized by enriched sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and some opportunistic pathogens in association with depleted butyrate-producing bacteria (BPB) and methanogens. b Gut metabolism in BD shows an overwhelming presence of H2S and shortage of butyrate and methane. This abnormal environment can contribute to the intestinal epithelial barrier damage and facilitate effector molecules or pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) to invade the intestinal epithelial cells (IEC). c The PAMPs including PNG/LPS combine with their corresponding pattern recognition receptors (PRR) TLR2/TLR4 on IEC. This process leads to chronic inflammation involving hyperactivation of T helper 1 (TH1) and T helper 17 (TH17) cells in the gut. d The effector molecules or PAMP migrate to blood vessels through the hepatic circulation. Then, they recognize the receptors of TLR/TLR4 on vascular endothelial cells (VEC) and induce systemic vasculitis via the subsequent activation of TH1 and TH17 cells. e A damaged vascular endothelial barrier due to the systemic vasculitis. The effector molecules or PAMP can further migrate to organs or tissues such as the eye, joint, skin, oral, and genital mucosa though the damaged vascular endothelial barrier. Subsequently, the PAMP recognize the receptors TLR2/TLR4 in these organs or tissues, which result in various clinical manifestations of BD, such as uveitis, arthritis, skin lesions, oral, or genital ulcers. f Since oral ulcers (aphthosis) can be induced by both disturbances of the oral microbiome and dysbiosis of the gut microbiome, it presents as the most common clinical feature in BD
Links between the disturbed gut microbiome and their possible immune signaling pathway in BD patients
| Disturbed gut microbiome | Enriched group | Species | Possible PAMP | Possible PRP | Possible related immune cells | Possible related immune cytokine | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRB | BD | LPS, H2S | TLR4 | Upregulation Th1 cells | IFN- | [ | |
| Opportunistic pathogens | BD | T3SS, T4SS, LPS, PGN | TLR2, TLR4 | Upregulation Th1 and Th17 cells | Unknown | [ | |
| BPB | N | Butyrate | TLR-MyD88 | Unregulation Treg cell | IL-10 | [ | |
| Methanogens | N | Methane | TLR-MyD88 | Macrophages | IL-10 | [ |
SRB sulfate-reducing bacteria; BPB butyrate-producing bacteria; PAMP pathogen-associated molecular pattern; PRP pattern recognition receptors; BD Behcet’s disease; N normal controls; PGN peptidoglycan; LPS lipopolysaccharides; TLR Toll-like receptors; H2S hydrogen sulfide; T3SS type III secretion system; T4SS type IV secretion system