Ali Tayebi Meybodi1, Arnau Benet1, Roberto Rodriguez Rubio2, Sonia Yousef2, Pooneh Mokhtari1, Mark C Preul1, Michael T Lawton3. 1. Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. 2. Skull Base and Cerebrovascular Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, USA. 3. Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Electronic address: Michael.Lawton@BarrowBrainandSpine.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The subtemporal and orbitozygomatic approaches are the most commonly used surgical approaches for the treatment of basilar artery apex (BAX) aneurysms. Relative advantages and disadvantages are generally reported based on surgeons' experience. This study was performed to provide a detailed comparison between the subtemporal and orbitozygomatic approaches based on cadaveric dissection analysis for the treatment of BAX aneurysms. METHODS: Subtemporal and orbitozygomatic approaches were performed on 5 cadaveric heads (10 sides), and the following variables were assessed and compared between the 2 approaches: 1) number of exposed perforators on P1-posterior cerebral arteries (PCA); 2) lengths of exposure and clipping for bilateral PCA, superior cerebellar arteries (SCA), and basilar trunk; 3) surgical area of exposure; and 4) surgical freedom at the BAX. RESULTS: Number of perforators exposed on P1-PCA was not different between the subtemporal and orbitozygomatic approaches. Exposure and clipping of ipsilateral SCA and PCA were superior using the subtemporal approach, and better for contralateral SCA and PCA using the orbitozygomatic approach, all reaching statistical significance. The orbitozygomatic approach provided greater exposure and clipping length for the proximal basilar trunk. Although the surgical area of exposure was similar between the 2 approaches, the overall surgical freedom was greater in the orbitozygomatic approach. CONCLUSIONS: The orbitozygomatic approach provides a greater number of surgical corridors to the BAX and is superior regarding multiple surgically relevant anatomic parameters. Importantly, control over the basilar trunk and over the contralateral SCA and PCA (blind spots) is superior with the orbitozygomatic approach.
BACKGROUND: The subtemporal and orbitozygomatic approaches are the most commonly used surgical approaches for the treatment of basilar artery apex (BAX) aneurysms. Relative advantages and disadvantages are generally reported based on surgeons' experience. This study was performed to provide a detailed comparison between the subtemporal and orbitozygomatic approaches based on cadaveric dissection analysis for the treatment of BAX aneurysms. METHODS: Subtemporal and orbitozygomatic approaches were performed on 5 cadaveric heads (10 sides), and the following variables were assessed and compared between the 2 approaches: 1) number of exposed perforators on P1-posterior cerebral arteries (PCA); 2) lengths of exposure and clipping for bilateral PCA, superior cerebellar arteries (SCA), and basilar trunk; 3) surgical area of exposure; and 4) surgical freedom at the BAX. RESULTS: Number of perforators exposed on P1-PCA was not different between the subtemporal and orbitozygomatic approaches. Exposure and clipping of ipsilateral SCA and PCA were superior using the subtemporal approach, and better for contralateral SCA and PCA using the orbitozygomatic approach, all reaching statistical significance. The orbitozygomatic approach provided greater exposure and clipping length for the proximal basilar trunk. Although the surgical area of exposure was similar between the 2 approaches, the overall surgical freedom was greater in the orbitozygomatic approach. CONCLUSIONS: The orbitozygomatic approach provides a greater number of surgical corridors to the BAX and is superior regarding multiple surgically relevant anatomic parameters. Importantly, control over the basilar trunk and over the contralateral SCA and PCA (blind spots) is superior with the orbitozygomatic approach.