Literature DB >> 30075975

Comparison of Radiofrequency Ablation and Hepatic Resection for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma 2 cm or Less.

Yuqian Huang1, Qin Shen2, Harrison X Bai3, Jing Wu2, Cong Ma2, Quanliang Shang2, Steven J Hunt3, Giorgos Karakousis4, Paul J Zhang5, Zishu Zhang6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare survival outcome of radiofrequency (RF) ablation and surgical resection (SR) for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤ 2 cm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients from the US National Cancer Database with HCC ≤ 2 cm received RF ablation or SR as sole treatment. Overall survival (OS) was compared using log-rank test, multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression, and propensity score matched analysis.
RESULTS: Of 833 patients included, 620 received RF ablation and 213 received SR. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 90%, 64%, and 47% for RF ablation and 89%, 75%, and 62% for SR. On univariate analyses, patients who received SR had longer OS than patients who received RF ablation, but this did not achieve statistical significance (P = .113). On multivariate analyses, female sex (HR = 0.700; 95% CI, 0.501-0.979; P = .037), African American (HR = 0.611; 95% CI, 0.398-0.938; P = .024) and Asian ethnicity (HR = 0.427; 95% CI, 0.230-0.790; P = .007), and median income ≥ $48,000 (HR = 0.695; 95% CI, 0.518-0.932; P = .015) were associated with longer OS, whereas higher Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores (HR = 1.023; 95% CI, 1.009-1.037; P = .001) were associated with shorter OS. After matching on age, sex, ethnicity, MELD score, and income, there was no significant difference in OS between the 2 treatment groups (log-rank P = .646).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in OS between RF ablation and SR in treatment of HCC measuring ≤ 2 cm.
Copyright © 2018 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30075975     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  3 in total

Review 1.  Is the Rationale of Anatomical Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Universally Adoptable? A Hypothesis-Driven Review.

Authors:  Young-Jen Lin; Cheng-Maw Ho
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 2.430

2.  Estimating the Individual Treatment Effect on Survival Time Based on Prior Knowledge and Counterfactual Prediction.

Authors:  Yijie Zhao; Hao Zhou; Jin Gu; Hao Ye
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.738

3.  Radiofrequency ablation versus microwave ablation for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Han; Yu-Chen Fan; Kai Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.