Literature DB >> 3007595

Development of auditory-evoked potentials in the cat. II. Wave latencies.

E J Walsh, J McGee, E Javel.   

Abstract

Brain stem and forebrain auditory-evoked potentials were studied parametrically during the first 90 postnatal days in unanesthetized kittens using tonal and click stimuli. This paper describes changes that occur in transmission time through the auditory pathway during development by analyses of the maturational time courses of latencies associated with waves of both auditory brain stem responses (ABR's) and late-occurring auditory-evoked potentials (AER's), recorded subdermally from the vertex. In response to click stimuli, ABR latencies were found to decay rapidly early in postnatal life and more slowly after the third postnatal week. Those trends were modeled as a two-stage sequential process, with a linear stage occurring between 7 and 18 postnatal days followed by an exponential stage during which adult latencies were achieved. AER latencies changes during development were less complicated, and followed a single-stage exponential time course. When threshold influences were taken into account--that is, when data were adjusted so that sensation level (SL) was constant across age--the latency-maturation curves associated with all ABR waves were adequately described by a single exponential, and latencies recorded from young animals were substantially shorter than latencies associated with the same aged animals when analyses were carried out with constant sound-pressure level (SPL) stimuli across age. In addition, the difference function, generated when isoasymptotic SPL and SL latency versus age functions were subtracted from one another, was also represented by an exponential curve, suggesting that at least two processes underlie the latency decay that occurs during postnatal development. Evoked responses to tonal stimuli throughout development were consistent with the basoapical developmental gradient that is observed anatomically.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3007595     DOI: 10.1121/1.393462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  Does cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation affect residual hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons?

Authors:  Anne Coco; Stephanie B Epp; James B Fallon; Jin Xu; Rodney E Millard; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Precocious hearing in harbour porpoise neonates.

Authors:  Magnus Wahlberg; Lara Delgado-García; Jakob H Kristensen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Auditory brainstem responses in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis): effects of frequency, level, sex and size.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Nathan P Buerkle; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Development of brainstem-evoked responses in congenital auditory deprivation.

Authors:  J Tillein; S Heid; E Lang; R Hartmann; A Kral
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  Prolonged maturation of cochlear function in the barn owl after hatching.

Authors:  Christine Köppl; Regina Nickel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 2.389

6.  Ontogenetic development of the auditory sensory organ in zebrafish (Danio rerio): changes in hearing sensitivity and related morphology.

Authors:  Jiping Wang; Qiang Song; Dongzhen Yu; Guang Yang; Li Xia; Kaiming Su; Haibo Shi; Jian Wang; Shankai Yin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.