| Literature DB >> 30075110 |
Charles Osei-Bempong1, Ali E Ghareeb2, Majlinda Lako1, Francisco C Figueiredo3, W John Armitage4.
Abstract
Limbal stem cell (LSC) deficiency causes progressive loss of vision but may be treated by transplant of autologous LSCs. Cryopreservation has the potential to indefinitely extend the lifespan of LSCs allowing re-transplant in case of graft failure. In this study, we aimed to identify the optimal cryoprotectant and cryoprotectant concentration for LSC cultures. Suspension cultures derived from cadaveric corneoscleral rims were cooled to 4 °C with Me2SO, propylene glycol or ethylene glycol at a concentration of 5%, 10% or 15%. Cell tolerance was measured in terms of membrane integrity, colony-forming efficiency and alamarBlue® reduction. Increasing cryoprotectant concentration above 5% reduced membrane integrity, metabolism and colony-forming efficiency. Cryoprotectant choice did not significantly influence these characteristics. Cells demonstrating Side Population were maintained after cryopreservation with 5% propylene glycol in vapour phase liquid nitrogen for 1 week, indicating that cryopreservation of LSCs with relatively low cryoprotectant concentration (5%) has promise in low-temperature eye banking. CrownEntities:
Keywords: Cell tolerance; Cornea; Corneal transplant; Cryopreservation; Dimethyl sulphoxide; Ethylene glycol; Eye bank; Limbal stem cell deficiency; Limbal stem cells; Propylene glycol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30075110 PMCID: PMC6167250 DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2018.07.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cryobiology ISSN: 0011-2240 Impact factor: 2.487
Fig. 1Bar graphs showing mean alamarBlue® fluorescence for alive, irradiated and dead limbal suspension cultures at cell densities of 1000, 5000, 10,000 and 20,000 cells/cm2. (A) mean fluorescence ± SEM for a given cell density after 6 h of incubation with alamarBlue® (n = 3). Mean fluorescence was calculated as a percentage of the fluorescence of the positive controls. (B) mean fluorescence ± SEM for a given cell density after 12 h of incubation with alamarBlue® (n = 3). Mean fluorescence was calculated as a percentage of the fluorescence of the positive controls.
Fig. 2Bar graphs showing tolerance of limbal suspension cultures for each cryoprotectant at 5%, 10% and 15% concentrations, scaled to the positive controls. (A) mean membrane integrity ± SEM of limbal suspension cultures as measured by the Trypan blue assay after cooling to 4 °C for 10 min with either Me2SO, PD or EG at concentrations of either 5%, 10% or 15% by volume (n = 3). (B) mean metabolic activity ± SEM of limbal suspension cultures as measured by the alamarBlue® assay after cooling to 4 °C for 10 min with either Me2SO, PD or EG at concentrations of either 5%, 10% or 15% by volume (n = 3). (C) mean colony-forming efficiency ±SEM of limbal suspension cultures after cooling to 4 °C for 10 min with either Me2SO, PD or EG at concentrations of either 5%, 10% or 15% by volume (n = 3). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 3Flow cytometry plots of cryopreserved and thawed limbal suspension cultures showing the presence or absence of a Side Population fraction which extrude Hoechst. (A) uncryopreserved, cultured human fibroblasts in the presence of Hoechst. The trapezoid encapsulates the SP fraction (P2). (B) uncryopreserved human limbal epithelial cells in the presence of Hoechst. The trapezoid encapsulates the SP fraction (P2 – shown in green). (C) cryopreserved cultured human limbal epithelial cells in the presence of Hoechst. The trapezoid encapsulates the SP fraction (P2 – shown in green). The SP fraction in cryopreserved cultured human limbal epithelial cells is obliterated by incubation with Verapamil (D) and Fumitremorgin (E). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)