Literature DB >> 30074849

Extra-Sinus Zygomatic Implants to Avoid Chronic Sinusitis and Prosthetic Arch Malposition: 12 Years of Experience.

Paweł Aleksandrowicz1, Marta Kusa-Podkańska1, Katarzyna Grabowska2, Lidia Kotuła3, Anna Szkatuła-Łupina4, Joanna Wysokińska-Miszczuk1.   

Abstract

This report retrospectively at the 12-year follow-up results of the treatment and rehabilitation of edentulous maxillae, applying extra-sinus zygomatic implants alone or in combination with intra-sinus zygomatic implants. We recruited 22 patients with 35 zygomatic Brånemark system implants; 24 implants in the standard Brånemark protocol through the sinus and 11 extra-sinus implants outside the sinus. Additionally, 147 regular implants were placed. The minimum follow-up period was 50 months to a maximum of 152 months. The zygoma survival rate after 12 years was 97.15%. Chronic sinusitis occurred in 11.42% of patients. We lost 1 (2.85%) zygomatic implant placed through the sinus and none of those in the extra-sinus position. The survival rate of the regular implants was 93.87%. Chronic sinusitis occurred in 4 patients (11.42%) who received zygomatic implants using standard protocol through the sinus. None of the extra-sinus zygoma patients developed sinusitis. Peri-implantitis was detected with only 3 zygomatic implants. In the original P-I Brånemark zygoma protocol the implants were passing through the sinus, which resulted in chronic sinusitis in some patients and malposition of the prosthetic platform toward the palate. These complications can be avoided by the extra-sinus placement of zygoma implants as demonstrated in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30074849     DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-18-00034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  4 in total

Review 1.  Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding the effectiveness of zygomatic implants: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  P-H Sales; M-V Gomes; O-B Oliveira-Neto; F-J de Lima; J-C Leão
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2020-07-01

Review 2.  Full arch rehabilitation in patients with atrophic upper jaws with zygomatic implants: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ana Helena Pereira Gracher; Marcos Boaventura de Moura; Patrícia da Silva Peres; Geninho Thomé; Luís Eduardo Marques Padovan; Larissa Carvalho Trojan
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-02-26

3.  Platform switch hybrid zygoma implants improve prosthetics and marginal bone protection after extra-sinus placement.

Authors:  Paweł Aleksandrowicz; Marta Kusa-Podkańska; Witold Tomkiewicz; Lidia Kotuła; Jan Perek; Joanna Wysokińska-Miszczuk
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.932

4.  Retrospective Analysis of Clinical and Radiologic Data Regarding Zygomatic Implant Rehabilitation with a Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Michele Di Cosola; Andrea Ballini; Khrystyna Zhurakivska; Alberto Ceccarello; Riccardo Nocini; Annarita Malcangi; Giorgio Mori; Lorenzo Lo Muzio; Stefania Cantore; Antonio Olivo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.