Literature DB >> 30073547

Applicants to medical school: if at first they don't succeed, who tries again and are they successful?

Barbara Griffin1, Jaime Auton2, Robbert Duvivier3, Boaz Shulruf4, Wendy Hu5.   

Abstract

This study compared the profile of those who, after initial failure to be selected, choose to reapply to study medicine with those who did not reapply. It also evaluates the chance of a successful outcome for re-applicants. In 2013, 4007 applicants to undergraduate medical schools in the largest state in Australia were unsuccessful. Those who chose to reapply (n = 665) were compared to those who did not reapply (n = 3342). Results showed that the odds of re-applying to medicine were 55% less for those from rural areas, and 39% more for those from academically-selective schools. Those who had higher cognitive ability and high school academic performance scores in 2013 were also more likely to re-apply. Socioeconomic status was not related to re-application choice. Re-applicants' showed significant improvements in selection test scores and had a 34% greater probability of selection than first-time applicants who were also interviewed in the same selection round. The findings of this study indicate that re-testing and re-application improves one's chance of selection into an undergraduate medical degree, but may further reduce the diversity of medical student cohorts in terms of rural background and educational background.

Keywords:  Retesting; Selection; Widening participation

Year:  2018        PMID: 30073547     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-018-9847-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  3 in total

1.  "The biggest barrier was my own self": the role of social comparison in non-traditional students' journey to medicine.

Authors:  Rachel Ball; Kirsty Alexander; Jennifer Cleland
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2020-06

2.  Self-efficacy and confidence of medical students with prior scribing experience: A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Elizabeth M McCarthy; Richard Feinn; Listy A Thomas
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2022-12

3.  Selecting top candidates for medical school selection interviews- a non-compensatory approach.

Authors:  Boaz Shulruf; Anthony O'Sullivan; Gary Velan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.463

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.