Axel Hauschild1, James Larkin2, Antoni Ribas3, Brigitte Dréno4, Keith T Flaherty5, Paolo A Ascierto6, Karl D Lewis7, Edward McKenna8, Qian Zhu8, Yong Mun8, Grant A McArthur9,10. 1. University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany. 2. The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, England. 3. The Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California, Los Angeles. 4. Nantes University, Nantes, France. 5. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. 6. Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy. 7. University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora. 8. Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California. 9. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 10. University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
Importance: Prognostic models may provide insight into clinical trial results and inform the clinical management of patients with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma. Objective: To identify subgroups with distinct survival outcomes based on clinical and genomic characteristics and to assess survival in identified prognostic subgroups across cohorts treated with dacarbazine, vemurafenib, or cobimetinib plus vemurafenib. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective and exploratory recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) modeled associations between prespecified covariates and survival outcomes using pooled data from the BRIM-2, BRIM-3, BRIM-7, and coBRIM studies. Interventions: Dacarbazine, vemurafenib, or cobimetinib plus vemurafenib. Main Outcomes and Measures: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The RPA included 1365 patients (783 men; 57.4%). Of these, 1032 (75.6%) were older than 65 years; 310 received cobimetinib plus vemurafenib; 717, vemurafenib alone; and 338, dacarbazine. Median follow-up was 14.1 months (interquartile range, 6.3-28.3 months). In the RPA that included all patients, baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), presence or absence of liver metastases, and baseline sum of longest diameters of target lesions (SLDs) were significant prognostic factors for PFS: Median PFS was longest in patients with lower LDH (≤2 × upper limit of normal [ULN]), ECOG PS 0, and shorter SLD (≤44 mm) (11.1 months; 95% CI, 7.0-18.4 months), and shortest in those with elevated LDH (>2 × ULN) (3.5 months; 95% CI, 3.0-3.8 months). The subgroup with normal baseline LDH and no liver metastases had the longest median OS (22.7 months; 95% CI, 20.3-27.2 months). Similar PFS trends were observed when these prognostic subgroups were applied to the cobimetinib plus vemurafenib, vemurafenib alone, and dacarbazine cohorts. Baseline LDH, ECOG PS, and SLD were significant prognostic factors for OS: Median OS was longest in patients with normal LDH and shorter SLD (≤45 mm) (27.2 months; 95% CI, 22.1-32.1 months) and shortest in those with elevated LDH (>2 × ULN) (6.0 months; 95% CI, 5.3-6.8 months). Among patients in the most favorable subgroup (normal LDH and SLD ≤45 mm), 3-year OS rates were 53.3% (95% CI, 39.5%-67.1%) in the cobimetinib plus vemurafenib cohort, 35.6% (95% CI, 27.4%-43.8%) in the vemurafenib cohort, and 35.6% (95% CI, 24.8%-46.4%) in the dacarbazine cohort. Among patients with available gene expression data, RPA identified gene signature as a significant prognostic factor for PFS in those with normal LDH; 3-year PFS rates were 21.9%, (95% CI, 15.4%-28.4%) and 8.8% (95% CI, 3.6%-14.1%) in immune and cell cycle signature, respectively. The RPA for OS did not identify gene signature as a significant factor. Conclusions and Relevance: Baseline LDH, ECOG PS, disease burden, and gene signature appear to be key determinants of survival outcomes in patients with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma treated with BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors. These results are consistent with survival benefits of cobimetinib plus vemurafenib over vemurafenib alone observed in the coBRIM study.
Importance: Prognostic models may provide insight into clinical trial results and inform the clinical management of patients with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma. Objective: To identify subgroups with distinct survival outcomes based on clinical and genomic characteristics and to assess survival in identified prognostic subgroups across cohorts treated with dacarbazine, vemurafenib, or cobimetinib plus vemurafenib. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective and exploratory recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) modeled associations between prespecified covariates and survival outcomes using pooled data from the BRIM-2, BRIM-3, BRIM-7, and coBRIM studies. Interventions: Dacarbazine, vemurafenib, or cobimetinib plus vemurafenib. Main Outcomes and Measures: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The RPA included 1365 patients (783 men; 57.4%). Of these, 1032 (75.6%) were older than 65 years; 310 received cobimetinib plus vemurafenib; 717, vemurafenib alone; and 338, dacarbazine. Median follow-up was 14.1 months (interquartile range, 6.3-28.3 months). In the RPA that included all patients, baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), presence or absence of liver metastases, and baseline sum of longest diameters of target lesions (SLDs) were significant prognostic factors for PFS: Median PFS was longest in patients with lower LDH (≤2 × upper limit of normal [ULN]), ECOG PS 0, and shorter SLD (≤44 mm) (11.1 months; 95% CI, 7.0-18.4 months), and shortest in those with elevated LDH (>2 × ULN) (3.5 months; 95% CI, 3.0-3.8 months). The subgroup with normal baseline LDH and no liver metastases had the longest median OS (22.7 months; 95% CI, 20.3-27.2 months). Similar PFS trends were observed when these prognostic subgroups were applied to the cobimetinib plus vemurafenib, vemurafenib alone, and dacarbazine cohorts. Baseline LDH, ECOG PS, and SLD were significant prognostic factors for OS: Median OS was longest in patients with normal LDH and shorter SLD (≤45 mm) (27.2 months; 95% CI, 22.1-32.1 months) and shortest in those with elevated LDH (>2 × ULN) (6.0 months; 95% CI, 5.3-6.8 months). Among patients in the most favorable subgroup (normal LDH and SLD ≤45 mm), 3-year OS rates were 53.3% (95% CI, 39.5%-67.1%) in the cobimetinib plus vemurafenib cohort, 35.6% (95% CI, 27.4%-43.8%) in the vemurafenib cohort, and 35.6% (95% CI, 24.8%-46.4%) in the dacarbazine cohort. Among patients with available gene expression data, RPA identified gene signature as a significant prognostic factor for PFS in those with normal LDH; 3-year PFS rates were 21.9%, (95% CI, 15.4%-28.4%) and 8.8% (95% CI, 3.6%-14.1%) in immune and cell cycle signature, respectively. The RPA for OS did not identify gene signature as a significant factor. Conclusions and Relevance: Baseline LDH, ECOG PS, disease burden, and gene signature appear to be key determinants of survival outcomes in patients with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma treated with BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors. These results are consistent with survival benefits of cobimetinib plus vemurafenib over vemurafenib alone observed in the coBRIM study.
Authors: Paolo A Ascierto; Grant A McArthur; Brigitte Dréno; Victoria Atkinson; Gabrielle Liszkay; Anna Maria Di Giacomo; Mario Mandalà; Lev Demidov; Daniil Stroyakovskiy; Luc Thomas; Luis de la Cruz-Merino; Caroline Dutriaux; Claus Garbe; Yibing Yan; Matthew Wongchenko; Ilsung Chang; Jessie J Hsu; Daniel O Koralek; Isabelle Rooney; Antoni Ribas; James Larkin Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-07-30 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Georgina V Long; Jean-Jacques Grob; Paul Nathan; Antoni Ribas; Caroline Robert; Dirk Schadendorf; Stephen R Lane; Carmen Mak; Philippe Legenne; Keith T Flaherty; Michael A Davies Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Jeffrey A Sosman; Kevin B Kim; Lynn Schuchter; Rene Gonzalez; Anna C Pavlick; Jeffrey S Weber; Grant A McArthur; Thomas E Hutson; Stergios J Moschos; Keith T Flaherty; Peter Hersey; Richard Kefford; Donald Lawrence; Igor Puzanov; Karl D Lewis; Ravi K Amaravadi; Bartosz Chmielowski; H Jeffrey Lawrence; Yu Shyr; Fei Ye; Jiang Li; Keith B Nolop; Richard J Lee; Andrew K Joe; Antoni Ribas Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alexander M Menzies; James S Wilmott; Martin Drummond; Serigne Lo; Megan Lyle; Matthew M K Chan; John F Thompson; Alex Guminski; Matteo S Carlino; Richard A Scolyer; Richard F Kefford; Georgina V Long Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Antoni Ribas; Rene Gonzalez; Anna Pavlick; Omid Hamid; Thomas F Gajewski; Adil Daud; Lawrence Flaherty; Theodore Logan; Bartosz Chmielowski; Karl Lewis; Damien Kee; Peter Boasberg; Ming Yin; Iris Chan; Luna Musib; Nicholas Choong; Igor Puzanov; Grant A McArthur Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Georgina V Long; Jeffrey S Weber; Jeffrey R Infante; Kevin B Kim; Adil Daud; Rene Gonzalez; Jeffrey A Sosman; Omid Hamid; Lynn Schuchter; Jonathan Cebon; Richard F Kefford; Donald Lawrence; Ragini Kudchadkar; Howard A Burris; Gerald S Falchook; Alain Algazi; Karl Lewis; Igor Puzanov; Nageatte Ibrahim; Peng Sun; Elizabeth Cunningham; Amy S Kline; Heather Del Buono; Diane Opatt McDowell; Kiran Patel; Keith T Flaherty Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: P B Chapman; C Robert; J Larkin; J B Haanen; A Ribas; D Hogg; O Hamid; P A Ascierto; A Testori; P C Lorigan; R Dummer; J A Sosman; K T Flaherty; I Chang; S Coleman; I Caro; A Hauschild; G A McArthur Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Antoni Ribas; Adil Daud; Anna C Pavlick; Rene Gonzalez; Karl D Lewis; Omid Hamid; Thomas F Gajewski; Igor Puzanov; Matthew Wongchenko; Isabelle Rooney; Jessie J Hsu; Yibing Yan; Erica Park; Grant A McArthur Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Monique K van der Kooij; Marjolein J A L Wetzels; Maureen J B Aarts; Franchette W P J van den Berkmortel; Christian U Blank; Marye J Boers-Sonderen; Miranda P Dierselhuis; Jan Willem B de Groot; Geke A P Hospers; Djura Piersma; Rozemarijn S van Rijn; Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk; Albert J Ten Tije; Astrid A M van der Veldt; Gerard Vreugdenhil; Michel W J M Wouters; John B A G Haanen; Alfonsus J M van den Eertwegh; Esther Bastiaannet; Ellen Kapiteijn Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Paolo A Ascierto; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Gerardo Botti; Alfredo Budillon; Michael A Davies; Reinhard Dummer; Marc Ernstoff; Soldano Ferrone; Silvia Formenti; Thomas F Gajewski; Claus Garbe; Omid Hamid; Roger S Lo; Jason J Luke; Oliver Michielin; Giuseppe Palmieri; Laurence Zitvogel; Francesco M Marincola; Giuseppe Masucci; Corrado Caracò; Magdalena Thurin; Igor Puzanov Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Victoria G Atkinson; Pietro Quaglino; Massimo Aglietta; Michele Del Vecchio; Roberta Depenni; Francesca Consoli; Dimitrios Bafaloukos; Pier Francesco Ferrucci; Skaiste Tulyte; Ivana Krajsová; Paolo A Ascierto; Rossana Gueli; Ana Arance; Helen Gogas; Hiya Banerjee; Teddy Saliba; Egbert de Jong; Bart Neyns Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Paolo A Ascierto; Antoni Ribas; James Larkin; Grant A McArthur; Karl D Lewis; Axel Hauschild; Keith T Flaherty; Edward McKenna; Qian Zhu; Yong Mun; Brigitte Dréno Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 5.531