Literature DB >> 30073005

Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Both Overlapping and Independent Genetic Loci to Control Seed Weight and Silique Length in Brassica napus.

Hongli Dong1, Chuandong Tan1, Yuzhen Li1, Yan He1, Shuai Wei1, Yixin Cui1, Yangui Chen1, Dayong Wei2, Ying Fu3, Yajun He1, Huafang Wan1, Zhi Liu1, Qing Xiong4, Kun Lu1,5, Jiana Li1,5, Wei Qian1,5.   

Abstract

Seed weight (SW) is one of three determinants of seed yield, which positively correlates with silique length (SL) in Brassica napus (rapeseed). However, the genetic mechanism underlying the relationship between seed weight (SW) and silique length (SL) is largely unknown at present. A natural population comprising 157 inbred lines in rapeseed was genotyped by whole-genome re-sequencing and investigated for SW and SL over four years. The genome-wide association study identified 20 SNPs in significant association with SW on A01, A04, A09, C02, and C06 chromosomes and the phenotypic variation explained by a single locus ranged from 11.85% to 34.58% with an average of 25.43%. Meanwhile, 742 SNPs significantly associated with SL on A02, A03, A04, A07, A08, A09, C01, C03, C04, C06, C07, and C08 chromosomes were also detected and the phenotypic variation explained by a single locus ranged from 4.01 to 48.02% with an average of 33.33%, out of which, more than half of the loci had not been reported in the previous studies. There were 320 overlapping or linked SNPs for both SW and SL on A04, A09, and C06 chromosomes. It indicated that both overlapping and independent genetic loci controlled both SW and SL in B. napus. On the haplotype block on A09 chromosome, the allele variants of a known gene BnaA.ARF18.a controlling both SW and SL were identified in the natural population by developing derived cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (dCAPS) markers. These findings are valuable for understanding the genetic mechanism of SW and SL and also for rapeseed molecular breeding programs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BnaA.ARF18.a; Brassica napus; genome-wide association study; seed weight; silique length

Year:  2018        PMID: 30073005      PMCID: PMC6058094          DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Plant Sci        ISSN: 1664-462X            Impact factor:   5.753


Introduction

Seed weight (SW) is one of three determinants of seed yield together with seed number per silique and silique number per unit area in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) (Leon, 1993; Ali et al., 1995; Chen et al., 2007). It is a vital breeding objective to increase SW in rapeseed. However, the SW selection efficiency is low in the field, since SW can only be accurately calculated after harvest. The silique is one of the main photosynthetic organs formed when the leaves fall after flowering in rapeseed (Allen et al., 1971; King et al., 1997). The long silique has a big photosynthetic area and provides more spaces for seed development (Chay and Thurling, 2010). Many studies revealed several overlapped QTLs for SW and SL (Yang et al., 2012; Li et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2015). A recent study has revealed that BnaA.ARF18.a on A09 chromosome controls both SW and SL in rapeseed (Liu et al., 2015). These studies suggest that the length of silique seems to be an ideal indicator of seed weight. However, the morphological and molecular markers associated with seed weight were seldom applied due to certain problems. For example, the correlation between SW and SL was found to be positive but not very high in several investigations (Knapp et al., 1990; Chay and Thurling, 2010; Yang et al., 2012; Yuan, 2013; Li et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2015), indicating that the power of predicating SW with SL is not strong. Moreover, in the above-mentioned QTL studies, the genetic variants were only from two parents, and the mapping solution was relatively low with the use of traditional molecular markers, resulting that some linked-markers were not successfully and accurately employed to track SW in the accessions with diverse genetic background. To solve the above problems, it is necessary to understand the genetic control of SW and SL at the whole-genome level. Association mapping, also called linkage disequilibrium (LD) mapping, studies the statistical association of phenotypes with genetic markers in natural populations (Nordborg and Weigel, 2008; Huang et al., 2010; Xue et al., 2013). In the present study, the significant SNPs in association with SW and SL were investigated in a natural population comprising 157 inbred lines, and the allele variants in BnaA.ARF18.a were identified by developing derived cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (dCAPS) markers. Our results provide valuable information for understanding the genetic control of SW and SL, which may facilitate marker-based breeding in B. napus.

Materials and methods

Plant materials, field experiments, and trait evaluation

A natural population of rapeseed, comprising 52 spring rapeseeds lines from North America, 54 winter lines from Europe, and 51 semi-winter lines from China (Table S1), was employed to investigate SW and SL. These lines were successively selfed for at least 5 generations prior to further investigation. The lines were grown in the experimental field of Southwest University, Chongqing, (China) during 2013–2016 using a randomized complete block design with two replications. Each plot consisted of 30 plants, with 30 cm between rows and 20 cm within rows spacing. The field management followed the standard agriculture practice. At maturity, the well-developed siliques in the middle of inflorescence were collected from five individuals in the middle of each plot to investigate the silique length and to calculate the weight using dried seeds.

Statistical analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using GLM procedure of SAS. The broad-sense heritability was calculated using the formula, h2 = / ( + / n + / nr), where is the genetic variance, is the interaction variance of the genotype with environment, is the error variance, and n and r are the number of environments and replications, respectively (Hallauer et al., 1988). Pearson's correlation coefficient between traits of interest was calculated using the SAS CORR procedure. The best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) value for each line was calculated across all environments using the mixed linear model by considering both the genotype and the environment as random effects in the R package “LME4” (R Core Team, 2014). The phenotypic evaluation data between 2013–2016 and the BLUP value were subsequently used as a phenotypic data for the association mapping studies.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from the leaf in trefoil stage using CTAB method and sequenced using an Illumina HiseqTM 4000 (Illumina Co, Ltd.) with a 5X sequencing depth and 125-bp paired-end sequencing length. These were mapped to the reference genome Brassica napus.annotation_v5 (http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/brassicanapus/data/) with BWA software (http://bio-bwa.sourceforge.net/). SNPs were detected among accessions using GATK software (https://www.broadinstitute.org/gatk/guide/best-practices.php). The SNPs with the missing rate >0.6 were excluded. The remaining SNPs with the missing rate below 0.6 were filled using the software “beagle” v4.1(https://faculty.washington.edu/browning/beagle/beagle.html#download. The SNP loci with heterozygous rate over 25% and minor allele frequency (MAF) less than 0.05 were removed.

Population structure and genome-wide association analysis

Population structure was analyzed using the software STRUCTURE version 2.3.4 (Pritchard et al., 2000). The program was run with the following parameters: k, the number of groups in the panel varying from 1 to 9; 5 runs for each k value; for each run, both the length of the burning period and number of MCMC (Markov Chain Monte Carlo) replications after burning were set to 10000. The most likely K-value was determined by posterior probability [LnP(D)] and an ad hoc statistic Δk (Evanno et al., 2005). Principal component analysis (PCA) based on all 690,953 SNPs was carried out via the TASSEL v5.2 software (Bradbury et al., 2007). The Q and K matrices were used in the following association analysis using mrMLM (Wang et al., 2016). The P (-log10P) value for each SNP was exported to generate a Manhattan plot using the R package “qqman” (R Core Team, 2014). The input genotype file contained all SNPs that passed through a MAF filter of 0.05. Significant haplotype blocks were identified using the R package “LD heatmap” (Gabriel et al., 2002; Shin et al., 2006).

Development of dCAPS markers

In order to distinguish the SNPs in association with SW and SL in the natural population with the use of PCR-based molecular marker, the CAPS/ dCAPS primer was designed by dCAPS Finder 2.0 (http://helix.wustl.edu/dCAPS/dCAPS.html), whereas the opposite primer was generated by Primer Primer5 program. The primers and restriction enzymes were listed in Figure 5.
Figure 5

Development of two dCAPS markers in BnaA.ARF18a, BnaA.ARF18a-186 (Top) and BnaA.ARF18a-262 (Bottom). The primers and the restriction enzymes were displayed in the box. The blue letter represents the SNP among haplotypes, while the red letter represents the transversion in the restriction site.

PCR was performed in a total volume of 20 μL, which contained 100 ng of template DNA, 5 μM primer combination, 100 μM of each dNTP, 1 μL 10 × Taq Buffer+ (200 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.4, 200 mM KCl, 100 mM (NH4)2 SO4, 15 mM MgCl2), and 1 U Taq DNA Polymerase (Biomed). The reaction system was initially denatured at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 30–35 cycles for PCR amplification, using the following conditions: denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at Tm-5°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 30 s. The PCR products were digested with the corresponding restriction enzyme at the optimal temperature to activate the enzyme, and the digested products were separated by 3% agarose gel electrophoresis.

Results

Phenotypic variations and correlation between seed weight and silique length

We detected significant variations among the 157 inbred lines in 4 consecutive years (2013–2016) for SW ranging from 1.65 to 5.50 g and for SL ranging from 2.97 to 11.44 cm. Both SW and SL exhibited the normal distribution pattern each year (Figures 1A,B), indicating that SW and SL were quantitative traits. Analysis of variance indicated significant differences (p = 0.01) among genotypes, environments, and genotype × environment for SW and SL (Table 1). High broad-sense heritability 0.912 and 0.899 for SW and SL, were detected, respectively. It was in accordance with the high correlations between years for SW (above diagonal line) and SL (below diagonal line) (Table 2). However, a weak positive correlation (r = 0.332 on average) was also detected between SW and SL in each year (diagonal line) (Table 2).
Figure 1

Distribution of seed weight and silique length in 4 years.

Table 1

Phenotypic variation and analysis of variance (ANOVA) of seed weight and silique length in the association panel.

TraitSourceDFSSMSF-valueP-value
Seed weightGenotypes (G)153420.8422.750633.48< 0.0001
Environments (E)355.8618.620226.66< 0.0001
G*E443106.8170.2412.94< 0.0001
Repeatability20.3930.1972.390.092
Silique lengthGenotypes (G)1561185.0697.59742.09< 0.0001
Environments (E)387.98929.3298162.5< 0.0001
G*E416239.9510.57683.2< 0.0001
Repeatability20.8390.4202.330.0984
Table 2

Correlation of silique weight (SW) and silique length (SL).

Environment2013201420152016
20130.368***0.81***0.67***0.65***
20140.69***0.444***0.67***0.58***
20150.61***0.64***0.212**0.56***
20160.75***0.76***0.70***0.305***

Above diagonal line: correlation for SW between years; Diagonal line: correlation between SW and SL; Below diagonal line: correlation for SL between years

Significance level at p = 0.01,

Significance level at p = 0.001.

Distribution of seed weight and silique length in 4 years. Phenotypic variation and analysis of variance (ANOVA) of seed weight and silique length in the association panel. Correlation of silique weight (SW) and silique length (SL). Above diagonal line: correlation for SW between years; Diagonal line: correlation between SW and SL; Below diagonal line: correlation for SL between years Significance level at p = 0.01, Significance level at p = 0.001.

Genotyping the association population by re-sequencing

The whole-genome sequencing of 157 inbred lines was carried out using an Illumina HiSeqTM 4000 (Illumina Co, Ltd.), producing 45.6 million reads with the length of 125-bp for each line on average (Table S1). A total of 5.29 million SNPs were identified among lines in the natural population (Table S1). After filtering, 690,953 SNPs with high quality were mapped into 19 chromosomes of rapeseed, ranging from 71,147 SNPs in C02 to 16,958 SNPs in A08 (Table S2). The average density of SNP markers across the chromosomes was 10.71 SNP per 10 kb, ranging from 7.56 (C09) to 16.70 (A04) SNP per 10 kb (Table S2).

Population structure and genetic diversity analyses in natural population

In order to assess the population effect, we analyzed the genetic structure in the natural population using the Evanno method to calculate Δk value and found the highest ΔK at k = 3 (Figure 2A). Therefore, this natural population was divided into three subgroups, which was in accordance with the ecotype habit of accessions, spring, winter, and semi-winter type. This classification was also verified by PCA analysis, where the 157 natural lines were mainly classified into three subgroups (Figure 2B).
Figure 2

Phylogenetic relationships among 157 inbred accessions. (A) Analysis of the population structure composed of 157 rapeseed lines with STRUCTURE. Each individual is represented by a vertical bar, partitioned into colored segments with the length of each segment representing the proportion of the individual's genome, and with the same colored segment representing the same genomic components. (B) Principle component analysis. The first two principal components are shown. The individuals with the same label have the same ecotype.

Phylogenetic relationships among 157 inbred accessions. (A) Analysis of the population structure composed of 157 rapeseed lines with STRUCTURE. Each individual is represented by a vertical bar, partitioned into colored segments with the length of each segment representing the proportion of the individual's genome, and with the same colored segment representing the same genomic components. (B) Principle component analysis. The first two principal components are shown. The individuals with the same label have the same ecotype.

Genome-wide association analysis

Genome-wide association analysis was carried out using the Q+K model to identify association signals at whole-genome level. In total, we identified 20 SNPs in association with SW on A01 (1), A04 (13), A09 (4), C02 (1), and C06 (1) chromosomes, whereas 742 SNPs in association with SL were identified on A02 (2), A03 (4), A04 (27), A07 (355), A08 (1), A09 (286), C01 (21), C03 (1), C04 (1), C06 (11), C07 (28), and C08 (5) chromosomes using 4 years and BLUP data, with 323 overlapping or linked SNPs for both SW and SL on A04 (39), A09 (282), and C06 (2) chromosomes (Figure 3; Table 3; Tables S3, S4). In comparison with the previous studies (Quijada et al., 2006; Udall et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2007; Samizadeh et al., 2007; Radoev et al., 2008; Shi et al., 2009; Basunanda et al., 2010; Fan et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2011; Cai et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2012; Li et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2015; Geng et al., 2016), we found that 13 SNPs on the A04 chromosome were first detected for SW, whereas 447 SNPs were first detected for SL including A02 (2), A04 (27), A07 (298), A09 (7), C01 (1), C04 (1), C06 (9), C07 (28), and C08 (5) (Table 3). The phenotypic variation explained by a single locus ranged from 11.85 to 34.58% for SW and 4.01 to 48.02% for SL, with an average of 25.43% for SW and of 33.33% for SL. Of these, 282 SNPs forming a haplotype block on A09 (27.78–28.61 Mb) were located in the interval of known QTL for SW and SL (Figure 3, Table 3) (Yang et al., 2012; Li et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2015). Taken together, the overlapping and independent genetic loci control both SW and SL.
Figure 3

Manhattan plots of the genome-wide association mapping for seed weight (up) and silique length (below). X-axis indicates the physical positions of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) along the 19 chromosomes; each environment is displayed by different colors, while y-axis is the value of -log10(P). The horizontal dashed line represents the significance threshold with -log10(P) = 6.02.

Table 3

List of single nucleotide polymorphisms with significant association with seed weight (SW) and silique length (SL) using 4 years and BLUP field data among 157 rapeseed lines.

CodeSNPR2%Chr.No.EnvironmentKnown loci
SW
1820709025.23A011BLUPShi et al., 2009; Fan et al., 2010
21430885711.842A0412015
315814854-1598054121.13–27.66A04122013/BLUP
428116249-2818046231.20–34.58A093BLUPBasunanda et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2012; Li et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2015
53132559523.59A0912013Basunanda et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2012; Li et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2015
636041716.87C0212016Udall et al., 2006; Radoev et al., 2008; Basunanda et al., 2010; Fu et al., 2015
73118207928.82C061BLUPShi et al., 2009; Li et al., 2014
SL
111025788-1788404418.26–25.95A0222013/2015
210984418-142470894.01–21.92A0342013Zhang et al., 2011
315453957-1611080612.34–34.21A04272013/BLUP
48153268-890855214.85–30.97A07532013/2016Zhang et al., 2011;
516126618-1638017623.97–30.17A0742013/2016/BLUPYang et al., 2012
619760561-2056705325.67–39.78A072982013/2016/BLUP
71047620232.23A0812013Zhang et al., 2011
812872271-1294985030.54–31.26A0972014
927782829-2861299715.70–48.02A092792013/2014/2015/2016/BLUPYang et al., 2012; Li et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2015
103750581-378222727.73–39.13C01162013/2016/BLUPChen et al., 2007; Cai et al., 2012
111505317827.00–34.42C0142013/2014/2016/BLUPLi et al., 2014
123015170324.95C011BLUP
132191017914.55C0312013Yang et al., 2012
144624074230.88C0412013
15106174-26191423.42–23.85C0622013Zhang et al., 2011
161214062-182543923.0823.58C0622013
17623176722.59–28.12C0622013/BLUP
1830332388-3118207931.28–43.56C0652013/2016/BLUP
195380751-596058113.96–28.38C07252013/2014/BLUP
20714276517.31C0712013
21291219206.46–6.76C0722016/BLUP
2231257717-3130649035.48–38.13C0852016/BLUP
Manhattan plots of the genome-wide association mapping for seed weight (up) and silique length (below). X-axis indicates the physical positions of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) along the 19 chromosomes; each environment is displayed by different colors, while y-axis is the value of -log10(P). The horizontal dashed line represents the significance threshold with -log10(P) = 6.02. List of single nucleotide polymorphisms with significant association with seed weight (SW) and silique length (SL) using 4 years and BLUP field data among 157 rapeseed lines.

Haplotype analysis of BnaA.ARF18.a

We mapped this haplotype block on A09 chromosome to the reference genome of “ZS11” (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA394926/) and found a known gene copy BnaA.ARF18.a (A09_random: 3307497-3310118 in the “Darmor-bzh” reference genome) in this haplotype block controlling both SW and SL in rapeseed (Liu et al., 2015). Within this gene, we detected 6 SNPs (+186, +193, +262, +1045, +1303, +1345) in the exon (we defined the start codon is +1) and 3 SNPs (+59, +931, +1429) in the intron, thereby forming 3 haplotypes (Hap A, B, and C) in the natural population (Figures 4A–C). The 2 SNPs (+186, +1429) in the exon caused the amino acid changes between Hap C and Hap A, B (Figure 4C).
Figure 4

Association mapping and haplotypes of BnaA.ARF18a in natural population of rapeseed. (A) Plot describing marker-trait association for the trait SW (blue dot) and SL (orange dot) within the gene BnaA.ARF18.a. (B) Haploblock showing markers in linkage disequilibrium (LD) (>r2 = 0.6). (C) Exon-intron structure of BnaA.ARF18a and single nucleotide polymorphisms. Grey boxes and black lines indicated exon and intron, respectively. (D) Haplotype analysis for BnaA.ARF18.a. in three subgroups. S, W, and SW indicate the spring, winter, and semi-winter rapeseed subgroup, respectively.

Association mapping and haplotypes of BnaA.ARF18a in natural population of rapeseed. (A) Plot describing marker-trait association for the trait SW (blue dot) and SL (orange dot) within the gene BnaA.ARF18.a. (B) Haploblock showing markers in linkage disequilibrium (LD) (>r2 = 0.6). (C) Exon-intron structure of BnaA.ARF18a and single nucleotide polymorphisms. Grey boxes and black lines indicated exon and intron, respectively. (D) Haplotype analysis for BnaA.ARF18.a. in three subgroups. S, W, and SW indicate the spring, winter, and semi-winter rapeseed subgroup, respectively. The distribution of haplotypes within the three subgroups is shown in Figure 4D. Significant differences were found among haplotypes for SW and SL. The lines carrying Hap A showed the lowest seed weight (3.02 ± 0.29 g) and shortest silique length (5.09 ± 0.35 cm), followed by Hap B (3.44 ± 0.42 g for seed weight, 5.38 ± 0.36 cm for silique length) and Hap C (4.05 ± 0.46 g for seed weight, 7.37 ± 1.8 cm for silique length) (Figure 4D). In addition, we also found that Haplotype C was not present in winter materials, indicating that introgressing this haplotype into winter material could be very helpful.

Functional maker development and verification for BnaA.ARF18.a

A paralog of BnaA.ARF18.a was found on C08 chromosome (30957695-30960363) in the “Darmor-bzh” reference genome. In order to distinguish the SNPs among the three haplotypes using a simple and low-cost pattern for crop improvement, we developed two dCAPS functional markers to distinguish the natural variances in the BnaA.ARF18.a gene copy specially, and not in its paralog (Figure 5). By transforming A to T at +187 site of BnaA.ARF18a gene in the PCR products using “BnaA.ARF18.a-186,” the EcoRV restriction site (5′…GATATC…3′) was successfully created in Hap C, but not in Hap A and Hap B (5′…GATATG…3′). It means that EcoRV can digest the PCR products into two fragments (188 bp and 23 bp) in Hap C, but not in Hap A and Hap B. Similarly, by transiting C to G at the site of +266 of BnaA.ARF18a gene, the PCR products using “BnaA.ARF18a-262” contained the BsmAI restriction site (5′…GTCTCT…3′) in Hap B and C, but not in the Hap A (5′…GTCTTT…3′). Therefore, the restriction enzyme BsmAI can digest the PCR products into two fragments with the length of 98 and 27 bp in the Hap B and Hap C, whereas the PCR products with the length of 125 bp remain uncleaved in Hap A. The two sets of dCAPS markers were employed to screen the accessions in the natural population. As expected, the PCR products in the accessions with Hap A couldn't be digested by EcoRV and BsmAI, whereas those of Hap B could only be digested by BsmAI and those of Hap C could be digested by both the two restriction enzymes (Figure 6A). These results indicated that the three different haplotypes could be distinguished easily with use of the two dCAPS markers.
Figure 6

Association of SNPs with seed weight and silique length revealed with dCAPS. Screening accessions in the natural population using BnaA.ARF18a-186 (up) and BnaA.ARF18a-262 (below) (A); Haplotype analysis (B) and location of dCAPS in the interval of QTL for seed weight and silique length (C) in a DH population (Fu et al., 2015).

Development of two dCAPS markers in BnaA.ARF18a, BnaA.ARF18a-186 (Top) and BnaA.ARF18a-262 (Bottom). The primers and the restriction enzymes were displayed in the box. The blue letter represents the SNP among haplotypes, while the red letter represents the transversion in the restriction site. Association of SNPs with seed weight and silique length revealed with dCAPS. Screening accessions in the natural population using BnaA.ARF18a-186 (up) and BnaA.ARF18a-262 (below) (A); Haplotype analysis (B) and location of dCAPS in the interval of QTL for seed weight and silique length (C) in a DH population (Fu et al., 2015). In the previous study, an overlapping QTL for SW and SL was located in the region from 27.54 to 31.42 Mb on A09 Chromosome in a DH population derived from a cross between “Express” (female) and “SWU07”(male) (Fu et al., 2015), and the reported gene BnaA.ARF18a was located in this region. We genotyped two parental lines and DH population using the two dCAPS markers and found that the genotype of “Express” and “SWU07” belonged to Hap A and Hap C, respectively. The two markers were successfully mapped into the interval of known QTLs with co-segregation pattern (Figure 6C). The seed weight and silique length in the DH lines with the allele from “Express” were significantly lower than that of “SWU07” (P < 0.001) (Figure 6B). These findings reveal that the set of dCAPS can be used to identify the optimal allele controlling both the SW and SL in A09.

Discussion

Seed weight is one of the most important yield traits and is determined by at least five signaling pathways in Arabidopsis and rice (Li and Li, 2016). In the previous studies, approximately 120 QTLs have been identified for SW in rapeseed (Quijada et al., 2006; Udall et al., 2006; Radoev et al., 2008; Shi et al., 2009; Basunanda et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2012; Li et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2015). In the present study, a natural population of rapeseed was genotyped by whole-genome re-sequencing, producing 690,953 informative SNPs. Of which, 20 and 742 SNPs were detected to associate with SW and SL, respectively, including more than half of loci, which were previously reported. To our knowledge, this is the first time that genome re-sequencing has been used to dissect genetic loci controlling SW and SL in rapeseed. Our data demonstrate the power of this approach in dissecting agronomic traits. The BnaA.ARF18.a gene (auxin-response factor 18) was reported to control SW and SL in a segregation population that derived from a cross between big seed parental line “zy72360” and small seed parent line “R1” (Liu et al., 2015). This gene was located in the known QTL interval on A09 chromosome (Yang et al., 2012; Li et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2015). We analyzed the haplotype of “zy72360” and “R1” using five SNPs (+262, +1045, +1303, +1345, +1429) within the BnaA.ARF18.a reported by Liu et al. (2015) and classified “zy72360” and “R1” into the Hap A (big seed group) and Hap C (small seed group), respectively. It showed the validity of the haplotype analysis in this study. Moreover, the successful development of the two functional markers to distinguish the natural variances of the BnaA.ARF18.a gene will be helpful for rapeseed molecular breeding. The silique is one of the main photosynthetic organs in the absence of leaves, contributing 80–95% of photosynthetic products in rapeseed during seed filling (King et al., 1997; Hu et al., 1998; Bennett et al., 2011), whereas it is one of the storage organs by transferring energy into the developing seed. Meanwhile, the silique is one of energy-consuming organs owing to its own development. Although the long silique of rapeseed has wide photosynthetic area to potentially produce more energy, it consumes a lot of energy for its own development. In this research, we detected a few overlapping loci that controlled both SW and SL, explaining no more than 34 and 48% of genetic variance of SW and SL, respectively. It was in accordance with a weak positive correlation between the length of silique and seed weight (Basunanda et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2012; Li et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2015). This suggests that the optimal length of silique is needed to balance the processes of producing, transferring, and consuming energy in silique in order to produce big seed size. Our data suggested that the overlapping and independent genetic loci controlled SW and SL, respectively. It is possible to improve seed weight without overdepending on long silique.

Data availability

The data set generated and analyzed in the current study is available from NCBI under BioProject accession PRJNA358784.

Author contributions

WQ conceived the study. WQ and HD designed the experiments. HD, YiC, KL, JL and DW performed the genotyping of the association panel. HD, CT, YL, SW, YaC, DW and YanH participated in the phenotyping of seed weight and silique length. HD, CT, YF, YajH and YaC participated in the linkage mapping experiment. HD, QX, CT, HW, ZL and WQ analyzed the data. HD and WQ wrote the paper. All the authors have read and participated in the editing of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  27 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces.

Authors:  Xuehui Huang; Xinghua Wei; Tao Sang; Qiang Zhao; Qi Feng; Yan Zhao; Canyang Li; Chuanrang Zhu; Tingting Lu; Zhiwu Zhang; Meng Li; Danlin Fan; Yunli Guo; Ahong Wang; Lu Wang; Liuwei Deng; Wenjun Li; Yiqi Lu; Qijun Weng; Kunyan Liu; Tao Huang; Taoying Zhou; Yufeng Jing; Wei Li; Zhang Lin; Edward S Buckler; Qian Qian; Qi-Fa Zhang; Jiayang Li; Bin Han
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples.

Authors:  Peter J Bradbury; Zhiwu Zhang; Dallas E Kroon; Terry M Casstevens; Yogesh Ramdoss; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Unraveling the complex trait of crop yield with quantitative trait loci mapping in Brassica napus.

Authors:  Jiaqin Shi; Ruiyuan Li; Dan Qiu; Congcong Jiang; Yan Long; Colin Morgan; Ian Bancroft; Jianyi Zhao; Jinling Meng
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Mapping of quantitative trait loci and development of allele-specific markers for seed weight in Brassica napus.

Authors:  Chuchuan Fan; Guangqin Cai; Jie Qin; Qingyuan Li; Minggui Yang; Jianzhong Wu; Tingdong Fu; Kede Liu; Yongming Zhou
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Quantitative trait analysis of seed yield and other complex traits in hybrid spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): 2. Identification of alleles from unadapted germplasm.

Authors:  Joshua A Udall; Pablo A Quijada; Bart Lambert; Thomas C Osborn
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-06-10       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Carbohydrate Content and Enzyme Metabolism in Developing Canola Siliques.

Authors:  S. P. King; J. E. Lunn; R. T. Furbank
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Detection of QTL for six yield-related traits in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) using DH and immortalized F(2) populations.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Yan Zhang; Xueping Liu; Baoyuan Chen; Jinxing Tu; Fu Tingdong
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Improving power and accuracy of genome-wide association studies via a multi-locus mixed linear model methodology.

Authors:  Shi-Bo Wang; Jian-Ying Feng; Wen-Long Ren; Bo Huang; Ling Zhou; Yang-Jun Wen; Jin Zhang; Jim M Dunwell; Shizhong Xu; Yuan-Ming Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A combined linkage and regional association mapping validation and fine mapping of two major pleiotropic QTLs for seed weight and silique length in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.).

Authors:  Na Li; Jiaqin Shi; Xinfa Wang; Guihua Liu; Hanzhong Wang
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 4.215

View more
  7 in total

1.  Fine mapping of a silique length- and seed weight-related gene in Brassica napus.

Authors:  Wenhao Shen; Pei Qin; Mengjiao Yan; Bao Li; Zengxiang Wu; Jing Wen; Bin Yi; Chaozhi Ma; Jinxiong Shen; Tingdong Fu; Jinxing Tu
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Regional association analysis coupled with transcriptome analyses reveal candidate genes affecting seed oil accumulation in Brassica napus.

Authors:  Min Yao; Mei Guan; Qian Yang; Luyao Huang; Xinghua Xiong; Habib U Jan; Kai P Voss-Fels; Christian R Werner; Xin He; Wei Qian; Rod J Snowdon; Chunyun Guan; Wei Hua; Lunwen Qian
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  GWAS and co-expression network combination uncovers multigenes with close linkage effects on the oleic acid content accumulation in Brassica napus.

Authors:  Min Yao; Mei Guan; Zhenqian Zhang; Qiuping Zhang; Yixin Cui; Hao Chen; Wei Liu; Habib U Jan; Kai P Voss-Fels; Christian R Werner; Xin He; Zhongsong Liu; Chunyun Guan; Rod J Snowdon; Wei Hua; Lunwen Qian
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Strong temporal dynamics of QTL action on plant growth progression revealed through high-throughput phenotyping in canola.

Authors:  Dominic Knoch; Amine Abbadi; Fabian Grandke; Rhonda C Meyer; Birgit Samans; Christian R Werner; Rod J Snowdon; Thomas Altmann
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 9.803

5.  QTL and Candidate Gene Identification for Silique Length Based on High-Dense Genetic Map in Brassica napus L.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Qamar U Zaman; Wenhui Huang; Desheng Mei; Jia Liu; Wenxiang Wang; Bingli Ding; Mengyu Hao; Li Fu; Hongtao Cheng; Qiong Hu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Genetic Characterization of Russian Rapeseed Collection and Association Mapping of Novel Loci Affecting Glucosinolate Content.

Authors:  Rim Gubaev; Lyudmila Gorlova; Stepan Boldyrev; Svetlana Goryunova; Denis Goryunov; Pavel Mazin; Alina Chernova; Elena Martynova; Yakov Demurin; Philipp Khaitovich
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 7.  Advances and Challenges for QTL Analysis and GWAS in the Plant-Breeding of High-Yielding: A Focus on Rapeseed.

Authors:  Shahid Ullah Khan; Sumbul Saeed; Muhammad Hafeez Ullah Khan; Chuchuan Fan; Sunny Ahmar; Osvin Arriagada; Raheel Shahzad; Ferdinando Branca; Freddy Mora-Poblete
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-10-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.