| Literature DB >> 30072955 |
Ki-Hoon Park1,2,3, Dhananjay Yadav1,2,3, Suk-Jeong Kim1,2,3, Jae-Ryong Kim4, Kyung-Hyun Cho1,2,3.
Abstract
There has been no information about the correlations between body weight distribution and lipoprotein metabolism in terms of high-density lipoproteins-cholesterol (HDL-C) and cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP). In this study, we analyzed the quantity and quality of HDL correlations in young women (21.5 ± 1.2-years-old) with a slim (n = 21, 46.2 ± 3.8 kg) or plump (n = 30, 54.6 ± 4.4 kg) body weight. Body weight was inversely correlated with the percentage of HDL-C in total cholesterol (TC). The plump group showed 40% higher body fat (26 ± 3 %) and 86% more visceral fat mass (VFM, 1.3 ± 0.3 kg) than the slim group, which showed 18 ± 2% body fat and 0.7 ± 0.2 kg of VFM. Additionally, the plump group showed 20% higher TC, 58% higher triglyceride (TG), and 12% lower HDL-C levels in serum. The slim group showed 34% higher apoA-I but 15% lower CETP content in serum compared to the plump group. The slim group showed a 13% increase in particle size and 1.9-fold increase in particle number with enhanced cholesterol efflux activity. Although the plump group was within a normal body mass index (BMI) range, its lipid profile and lipoprotein properties were distinctly different from those of the slim group in terms of CETP mass and activity, HDL functionality, and HDL particle size.Entities:
Keywords: HDL-cholesterol; apoA-I; blood pressure; body weight; lipoproteins
Year: 2018 PMID: 30072955 PMCID: PMC6060307 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00406
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Anthropometric data.
| Age (years) | 21.5 ± 1.2 | 21.9 ± 1.7 | 21.1 ± 0.5 | 0.0712 |
| Height (cm) | 161.5 ± 4.2 | 161.5 ± 4.3 | 161.6 ± 4.4 | 0.4728 |
| Weight (kg) | 50.2 ± 5.8 | 54.6 ± 4.4 | 46.2 ± 3.8 | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 19.2 ± 2.0 | 20.9 ± 1.3 | 17.7 ± 1.0 | <0.001 |
| Body fat (%) | 22.1 ± 4.4 | 25.9 ± 3.0 | 18.7 ± 2.1 | <0.001 |
| Visceral fat mass (kg) | 1.0 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | <0.001 |
| Subcutaneous fat mass (kg) | 10.3 ± 3.0 | 12.9 ± 2.1 | 8.0 ± 1.5 | <0.001 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 114.2 ± 9.6 | 117.0 ± 8.2 | 111.6 ± 10.3 | 0.1037 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 68.5 ± 8.1 | 71.0 ± 8.6 | 66.2 ± 7.2 | 0.0896 |
| Blood pulse (beats/min) | 83.9 ± 10.3 | 82.8 ± 11.7 | 84.9 ± 9.3 | 0.3255 |
| Augmentation Pressure (mmHg) | 0.9 ± 2.7 | 3.0 ± 2.5 | −0.2 ± 2.2 | 0.0137 |
| Augmentation Index | 3.3 ± 9.0 | 10.2 ± 5.6 | −0.6 ± 8.4 | 0.0128 |
| Reference age (years) | 24.1 ± 9.1 | 30.0 ± 13.9 | 20.8 ± 2.3 | 0.0339 |
p < 0.001 vs. plump group.
Serum profile.
| TC (mg/dL) | 188.3 ± 35.9 | 206.1 ± 31.1 | 172.1 ± 33.1 | 0.0129 |
| TG(mg/dL) | 63.3 ± 24.6 | 78.4 ± 27.3 | 49.7 ± 10.9 | 0.0035 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 70.5 ± 11.9 | 65.9 ± 8.2 | 74.7 ± 13.6 | 0.0454 |
| %HDL-C | 38.4 ± 8.6 | 32.6 ± 6.2 | 43.8 ± 6.9 | 0.0005 |
| TG/HDL-C | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.5 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.0032 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 106.8 ± 33.8 | 126.0 ± 32.4 | 89.5 ± 25.5 | 0.0070 |
| %LDL-C | 54.7 ± 8.4 | 59.3 ± 7.4 | 50.5 ± 7.2 | 0.0086 |
| apoA-I (mg/mL) | 2.7 ± 1.2 | 2.3 ± 1.1 | 3.1 ± 1.2 | 0.0467 |
| CETP mass | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 0.0477 |
| %CE-transfer | 28.9 ± 3.4 | 30.6 ± 3.9 | 27.4 ± 1.9 | 0.0202 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 79.5 ± 5.7 | 80.5 ± 5.1 | 78.6 ± 6.2 | 0.2300 |
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 5.8 ± 1.1 | 6.1 ± 1.1 | 5.6 ± 1.0 | 0.1380 |
| AST (karmen/mL) | 15.8 ± 1.5 | 15.5 ± 1.4 | 16.1 ± 1.6 | 0.1838 |
| ALT (karmen/mL) | 15.5 ± 2.2 | 14.9 ± 2.0 | 16.1 ± 2.3 | 0.1087 |
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001 vs. plump group.
Figure 1Correlation of % HDL-C with body mass index (A) and body fat mass (B).
Figure 2Electrophoretic patterns of apolipoproteins in HDL2 and HDL3. The number indicates band intensity (BI) of apoA-I from densitometric analysis using Gel-Doc (Bio-Rad). The expression level of apoA-I was compared by Western blotting. BI was calculated using Chemi-Doc (Bio-Rad).
Figure 3Cholesterol efflux activity and a representative photo of negatively-stained HDL2 and HDL3 from slim and plump groups (electron microscopy). All micrographs are shown at a magnification of 40,000×. The scale bar corresponds to 100 nm. (A) Shows measured particle size of HDL and particle number in the designated area. (B) Shows cholesterol efflux activity from macrophages.
Figure 4Serum antioxidant activity. Paraoxonase activity (A) and ferric ion reduction ability (B).
Figure 5Antioxidant activity of HDL2-associated enzymes. Ferric ion reduction ability (A) and Paraoxonase activity (B).
Figure 6Lipoprotein composition and glycation extent of slim and plump groups. Protein content (A) and glycation extent (B). Lipoprotein composition and glycation extent of slim and plump groups. Cholesterol (C) and triglyceride content (D).
Figure 7Lipoprotein properties between slim and plump groups. Electromobility of LDL (A), extent of oxidized species (B). Susceptibility to cupric ion mediated oxidation (C).