| Literature DB >> 30072758 |
P J Skrodzki1,2, M Burger3,4, L A Finney3,4, F Poineau5, S M Balasekaran5, J Nees4, K R Czerwinski5, I Jovanovic3,4.
Abstract
Uranyl fluoride (UO2F2) is a compound which forms in the reaction between water and uranium hexafluoride, a uranium containing gas widely used for uranium enrichment. Uranyl fluoride exhibits negligible natural background in atmosphere; as a result, its observation implies the presence and active operation of nearby enrichment facilities and could be used as a tracer for treaty verification technologies. Additionally, detection of UO2F2 has a potential application in guiding remediation efforts around enrichment facilities. Laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) has been proposed in the past as a viable technique for the detection and tracking of UO2F2. We demonstrate that ultrafast laser filamentation coupled with LIF extends the capabilities of standard LIF to enable remote detection of UO2F2. An intense femtosecond laser pulse propagated in air collapses into a plasma channel, referred to as a laser filament, allowing for the extended delivery of laser energy. We first investigate the luminescence of UO2F2 excited by the second harmonic of an ultrafast Ti:sapphire laser and subsequently excite it using the conical emission that accompanies ultrafast laser filamentation in air. We measure the decay rates spanning 4.3-5.6 × 104 s-1 and discuss the characteristics of the luminescence for both ultrafast- and filament-excitation. Larger decay rates than those observed using standard LIF are caused by a saturated component of prompt decay from annihilation of dense excited states upon excitation with an ultrafast source. The reproducibility of such decay rates for the given range of incident laser intensities 1.0-1.6 × 1011 W cm-2 is promising for the application of this technique in remote sensing.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30072758 PMCID: PMC6072712 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29814-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Measured absorption spectrum of UO2F2 in solution using UV/VIS spectrophotometer (green); incident laser spectrum (blue).
Figure 2Laser spectrum after passage through blank HF sample (gray) and through UO2F2 in solution (cyan) compared to incident laser spectrum (blue).
Figure 3Example of a multi-Voigt fit (red) to measured luminescence (black) with 1-mJ incident energy at delay 0 s.
Luminescence peak centroids and widths determined from multi-Voigt fit of data averaged for five long-gate (100 μs) measurements with gate delay of 0 μs and incident laser energy of 1 mJ.
| Peak label | Centroid (nm) | Width (FWHM, nm) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 500.25 ± 0.11 | 13.21 ± 0.59 |
| 2 | 521.56 ± 0.21 | 13.45 ± 0.66 |
| 3 | 546.16 ± 0.39 | 16.29 ± 0.70 |
| 4 | 572.65 ± 0.22 | 17.31 ± 0.94 |
| 5 | 599.74 ± 0.69 | 20.64 ± 3.68 |
Figure 4(a) Time-dependent luminescence of UO2F2 in solution excited by 1-mJ incident energy accumulated for 200 laser shots. (b) Logarithm of peak area A determined by fitting data with multi-Voigt algorithm as a function of time; the linear fits determine the decay constant γ for each peak (Table 2).
Estimated decay rates excited by 1-mJ incident laser energy and filament-excited decay rates for 1.6-mJ energy before filamentation and 1-mJ incident on the front face of the sample.
| Peak | Decay rate, | Filament-excited decay rate, |
|---|---|---|
| (×104 s−1) | (×104 s−1) | |
| 1 | 4.7 ± 0.1 | 4.7 ± 0.2 |
| 2 | 4.3 ± 0.1 | 4.4 ± 0.2 |
| 3 | 5.6 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.2 |
| 4 | 5.3 ± 0.2 | 4.6 ± 0.4 |
| 5 | 4.8 ± 0.8 | 5.5 ± 0.4 |
Figure 5Peak area for each of the five major peaks observed in the luminescence spectrum for varying incident laser energies; peaks are labeled in Fig. 3.
Figure 6(a) Comparison of the laser spectrum after filamentation (lighter blue) with the incident laser spectrum (darker blue). (b) Comparison of the spectrum after the filament transmitted through the blank HF sample (gray) with the UO2F2 in solution (cyan).
Figure 7(a) Time-dependent luminescence of UO2F2 in solution excited by 1.6-mJ incident energy before filamentation and 1-mJ measured at the front face of the sample accumulated for 300 shots. (b) Logarithm of peak area A determined by fitting data with multi-Voigt algorithm as a function of time; the linear fits determine the decay constant γ for each peak (Table 2).
Figure 8Experimental schematic for filament excitation. The incident 800-nm pulses are focused with an f/40 spherical mirror through a 100 μm-thick BBO crystal to create 400-nm pulses; residual 800-nm pulses are removed using a high-pass dichroic mirror. The filament plasma forms near geometrical focus of the spherical mirror; the conical emission expands after the filament plasma and excites the 0.05 M UO2F2 solution, placed 30 cm after the geometrical focus. Sample luminescence is collected with an f/2 collimator and transported through a 400-μm diameter optical fiber into an Echelle spectrograph coupled to an ICCD detector. Optical spectra are collected using an integrating sphere and directed into a compact CCD spectrometer via optical fiber.