| Literature DB >> 30072620 |
Elizabeth A Gibson1, Eva Laura Siegel2, Folake Eniola3, Julie Beth Herbstman4, Pam Factor-Litvak5.
Abstract
Polybrominated Diphenyl Ether (PBDE) flame retardants are environmental chemicals that cross the placenta during pregnancy and have shown evidence of neurotoxicity. As the in utero period is a sensitive developmental window, such exposure may result in adverse childhood outcomes. Associations between in utero PBDE exposure and neurodevelopment are found in animal models and increasingly in human population studies. Here, we review the epidemiological evidence of the association between prenatal exposure to PBDEs and motor, cognitive, and behavioral development in infants and children. Published work suggests a negative association between PBDE concentrations and neurodevelopment despite varying PBDE congeners measured, bio-specimen matrix used, timing of the biological sampling, geographic location of study population, specific developmental tests used, age of children at time of testing, and statistical methodologies. This review includes 16 published studies that measured PBDE exposure in maternal blood during pregnancy or in cord blood at delivery and performed validated motor, cognitive, and/or behavioral testing at one or more time during childhood. We evaluate possible mediation through PBDE-induced perturbations in thyroid function and effect measure modification by child sex. While the majority of studies support an adverse association between PBDEs and neurodevelopment, additional research is required to understand the mechanism of action, possibly through the perturbations in thyroid function either in the pregnant woman or in the child, and the role of biologically relevant effect modifiers such as sex.Entities:
Keywords: child behavior; child cognition; child motor development; child neurodevelopment; polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs); review
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30072620 PMCID: PMC6121413 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15081636
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Selection process for systematic review.
Evaluation on internal validity in individual studies.
| Were subjects with varying levels of exposure drawn from the same underlying population? | Was exposure assessed using validated methods? | Are we confident that the outcome of interest was not present at start of study? | Did the study adjust for confounding? | Was an independently validated measure used for outcome assessment? | Did the statistical analysis include at least 60% of the cohort over the course of the study? | Was adjustment made for multiple statistical comparisons between congeners and outcomes? | |
|
| |||||||
| | |||||||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |||||||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |||||||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X indicates “Yes” or “Mostly Yes”. X indicates “Mostly No” or “No”.
Summary of epidemiological studies by geographic region.
| Study | Exposure Matrix (Sample Size) | Years of Exposure Collection | Measured Congeners | Motor | Behavior | Cognitive | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| CHAMACOS cohort | |||||||
| Eskenazi et al., 2013 | Salinas Valley, California | Maternal blood during pregnancy or at delivery ( | 1999–2000 | Primary exposure: ΣPBDEs (BDE-47, -99, -100, and -153) | X | X | X |
| Sagiv et al., 2015 | Salinas Valley, California | Maternal blood during pregnancy or back-extrapolated ( | 1999–2002; additional 9-year-olds included in 2009–2011 | BDE-17, -28, -47, -66, -85, -99, -100, -153, -154, and -183 | X | X | X |
| HOME cohort | |||||||
| Chen et al., 2014 | Cincinnati, Ohio | Maternal serum at 16 weeks gestation ( | March 2003–February 2006 | BDE-17, -28, -47, -66, -85, -99, -100, -153, -154, and -183 (with focus on BDE-47) | X | X | X |
| Vuong et al., 2016 | Cincinnati, Ohio | Maternal serum at 4 months’ pregnancy (age 5, | 2003–2006 | BDE-17, -28, -47, -66, -85, -99, -100, -153, -154, and -183 | X | X | |
| Zhang et al., 2016 | Cincinnati, Ohio | Maternal serum at 4 months’ pregnancy ( | 2003–2006 | BDE-17, -28, -47, -66, -85, -99, -100, -153, -154, and -183 | X | X | |
| Braun et al., 2017 | Cincinnati, Ohio | Maternal serum ( | March 2003–January 2006 | BDE -28, -47, -85, -99, -100, -153, -154 | X | X | X |
| Vuong et al., 2017a | Cincinnati, Ohio | Maternal serum at enrollment ( | 2003–2006 | BDE-17, -28, -47, -66, -85, -99, -100, -153, -154, and -183 | X | ||
| Vuong et al., 2017b | Cincinnati, Ohio | Maternal serum at 16 weeks’ gestation ( | 2003–2006 | BDE-17, -28, -47, -66, -85, -99, -100, -153, -154, and -183 | X | ||
| World Trade Center cohort | |||||||
| Herbstman et al., 2010 | New York, NY | Cord blood plasma ( | 2001–2002; Pregnant as of 9/11 | BDE-47, -99, and -100 | X | X | |
| Cowell et al., 2015 | New York, NY | Cord blood plasma (age 4, | December 2001–June 2002 | BDE-47, -85, -99, -100, -153, -154, and -183 | X | ||
|
| |||||||
| Shy et al., 2011 | Southern Taiwan | Cord blood ( | 2007–2008 | BDE-15, -28, -47, -49, -99, -100, -153, -154, -183, -196, and -197 | X | X | X |
| Ding et al., 2015 | Shandong Province, Northern China | Cord blood serum (12 months, | September 2010–February 2012 | BDE-28, -47, -85, -99, -100, -153, -154, and -183 | X | X | X |
| Kim et al., 2018 | Seoul, Anyang, Ansan, and Jeju, Korea | Maternal serum ( | 2011–2012 | 19 unspecified PBDE congeners | X | X | X |
|
| |||||||
| Chevrier et al., 2016 | Brittany Region, France | Cord blood ( | 2002–2006 | BDE-47, -85, -99, -100, -119, -153, -154, -183, and -209 | X | ||
| Roze et al., 2009 | Northern Provinces of the Netherlands | Maternal serum at 35th week of pregnancy ( | October 2001–November 2002 | BDE-47, -99, -100, -153, and -154 | X | X | X |
| Gascon et al., 2011 | Catalonia, Spain | Cord blood ( | Mid 1997 | BDE-12–13, -32, -17, -28–33, -47, -100, -119, -99, -116, -85, -126, -155, -153, -183, -66, -71, -154, -138, and -190 | X | X | X |
Figure 2PBDE concentrations of BDE-47, -99, -100, and -153 across cohorts. 1. Points represent PBDE concentration medians. Ranges represent 25th to 75th percentiles for World Trade Center (WTC), Health Outcomes and Measurements of the Environment Study (HOME), Center for the Health Assessment of Mothers and Children of Salina (CHAMACOS), and the Chinese (Laizhou Wan) cohort. Ranges represent minimum and maximum for the Taiwanese and Spanish (INMA) cohorts.
Associations with cognitive, behavioral, and motor development outcomes across studies.
| Study | Roze et al., 2009 | Herbstman et al., 2010 | Gascon et al., 2011 | Shy et al., 2011 | Eskenazi et al., 2013 | Braun et al., 2014 | Chen at al., 2014 | Cowell et al., 2015 | Ding et al., 2015 | Sagiv et al., 2015 | Chevrier et al., 2016 | Vuong et al., 2016 | Braun et al., 2017 | Vuong et al., 2017a | Vuong et al., 2017b | Zhang et al., 2017 | Kim et al., 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive development tests | Bayley 4 | Age | 1, 2, 3 | 1 | 1–3 | 1–3 | |||||||||||||
| Sign 1 | −/+, −, − | − | − | − | |||||||||||||||
| WISC 5 | Age | 5–6 | 4, 7 | 7 | 5 | 10.5 | 6 | 5–8 | 5, 8 | ||||||||||
| Sign 1 | 0 3 | −,− | −/+ | − | − | − | 0 3 | − | − | ||||||||||
| Other 10 | Age | 5–6 | 4 | 5 | 1, 2 | 9, 12 | 5, 8 | 8 | 5, 8 | ||||||||||
| Sign 1 | − | − | 0 3 | 0 3, − | − | −, − | −/+ | −, − | |||||||||||
| Behavioral development tests | BASC 6 | Age | 7 | 2–5 | 10.5 | 2–8 | 5, 8 | ||||||||||||
| Sign 1,2 | − | − | −/+ | − | −,− | ||||||||||||||
| Conners’ 7 | Age | 5, 7 | 9, 12 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
| Sign 1,2 | − | − | 0 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| CBCL 8 | Age | 5–6 | 5 | 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 | 1–2 | ||||||||||||||
| Sign 1,2 | − | − | −, −, 0 3, 0 3, − | − | |||||||||||||||
| Other 11 | Age | 4 | 1 | 4–5 | 1, 2 | 9, 12 | 5, 8 | ||||||||||||
| Sign 1,2 | − | − | −/+ | 0 3, − | − | − | |||||||||||||
| Motor development tests | Bayley 4 | Age | 1, 2, 3 | 1 | 1, 2, 3 | ||||||||||||||
| Sign 1 | −, −/+, −/+ | 0 3 | 0 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| MSCA 9 | Age | 5–6 | 4 | 5, 7 | |||||||||||||||
| Sign 1 | − | − | − | ||||||||||||||||
| Other 12 | Age | 5–6 | 5, 7 | 1–2 | 10.5 | ||||||||||||||
| Sign 1 | − | − | 0 3 | 0 3 | |||||||||||||||
1 Sign indicates positive or negative associations with neurodevelopment. Minus (−) indicates that higher PBDE exposure was associated with poorer test scores. Plus (+) indicates that higher PBDE exposure was associated with better test scores. Combined (−/+) indicates that higher PBDE exposure was associated with both poorer and better test scores depending on the congener analyzed. 2 Tests for which a higher score indicates poorer performance were reverse coded so that all minus signs indicate poorer performance and all plus signs indicate better performance. 3 This table does not include statistical significance. Zeros indicate null effect estimates or results not presented. 4 Bayley = Bayley’s Scales of Infant Development, Mental Development Index (Cognitive) and Psychomotor Development Index (Motor). 5 WISC = Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-R) and Intelligence Scale for Children, Total, Verbal, Performance, and Perceptual Reasoning. 6 BASC = Behavioral Assessment System for Children. 7 Conners’ = Conners’ Kiddie Continuous Performance Test (KCP-T) and Conners’ Continuous Performance Test (CPT-II), including ADHD/DSM-IV scales, ADHD Index Scores, Inattention, Hyperactivity, and Impulsiveness Scales. 8 CBCL = Child Behavior Checklist. 9 MSCA = McCarthy Scales of Children’s Abilities, Verbal, Perceptive-Performance, Memory, and Quantitative Subscales. 10 Cognitive Other includes: Gesell Developmental Schedules Language Domain, MSCA, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Woodcock-Johnson Test of Achievement, Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment, Wide Range Achievement Test, Rey’s Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Test of Everyday Attention for Children, Wisconsin Card Sort Task-64, Virtual Morris Water Maze, Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Metacognition and Global Executive Function Subscales. 11 Behavioral Other includes: Parent-report social-emotional and adaptive behavior, Gesell Developmental Schedules Adaptive and Social Development Domains, California Preschool Social Competence Scale, ADHD Criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Social Responsiveness Scale, ADHD questionnaire, Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment Tower, Balloon Analogue Risk Task, Behavioral Rating Inventory of Inhibition, Shift, Emotional Control, Initiative, Working Memory, Planning, Organization of Materials, and Monitor Scales. 12 Motor Other includes: Gesell Developmental Schedules Motor Development Domain, Wide Range Achievement Test, Behavioral Assessment and Research Testing, Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery, Movement ABC, Touwen’s age-specific neurologic examination, and the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire.
Figure 3Associations between PBDEs and Bayley Scales coefficients and 95% confidence intervals across studies. 1. Points indicate beta coefficients (with 95% confidence intervals) for PBDE congeners’ association with Bayley Scale Mental Development Index at ages 1, 2, and 3 in the WTC and HOME cohorts. Age is noted in labels above. Negative coefficients indicate decreased neurocognitive functioning.
Figure 4Associations between PBDEs and WISC scores and 95% confidence intervals across studies. 1. Points indicate beta coefficients (with 95% confidence intervals) for PBDE congeners’ association with Wechsler Score (Full Scale, Verbal, Performance, Working Memory, Perceptive Reasoning, and Processing Speed) at ages between 1 and 10.5 in the WTC, HOME, PELAGIE, and CHAMACOS cohorts. Age is noted in labels above. Negative coefficients indicate decreased neurocognitive functioning.
Figure 5Associations between PBDEs and BASC scores and 95% confidence intervals across studies. 1 Points indicate beta coefficients (with 95% confidence intervals) for PBDE congeners’ association with Behavioral Assessment System for Children between ages 2 and 10.5 in the CHAMACOS and HOME cohorts. Age is noted in labels above. Positive coefficients indicate increased behavioral problems.
Figure 6Hypothesized Directed Acyclic Graph of PBDE exposure and neurodevelopment. 1. DAG shows theoretical direct effect of PBDEs on child neurodevelopment, possibly mediated by maternal thyroid dysfunction, confounded by maternal SES, age, and IQ, and any possible “Z” confounders, and modified by child sex.
Figure A1Funnel Plot of Beta Coefficients associated with Wechsler Scales. 1. Points indicate effect sizes of PBDEs on Wechsler Scale domains (Total, Performance Intelligence, Verbal Comprehension, Perceptual Reasoning, Working Memory, and Processing Speed). Standard errors, when not reported in the study, were back-calculated from the 95% confidence intervals.
Examination of covariates included in statistical models across studies.
| Author, Year | Braun et al., 2014 | Sagiv et al., 2015 | Zhang et al., 2016 | Vuong et al., 2016 | Chen et al., 2014 | Vuong et al., 2017a | Vuong et al., 2017b | Braun et al., 2017 | Gascon et al., 2011 | Herbstman et al., 2010 | Chevrier et al., 2016 | Cowell et al., 2015 | Kim et al., 2018 | Ding et al., 2015 | Eskenazi et al., 2013 | Roze et al., 2009 | Shy et al., 2011 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted Covariates (Confounders) | Mat. Age | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
| Gest. Age 1 | √ | √ | √ | |||||||||||||||
| Edu. 1 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||
| Race | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||||||
| Infant sex | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| Infant age at testing | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||||||||||
| BFD 1 | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||||||||
| SES 1 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||||||
| Smoking Status 1 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||||
| Maternal IQ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||||
| Marital Status | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||
| Parity | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||||||||
| HOME score 1 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||
| Other chemicals 1 | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||||||||||||||
| Total | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 |
1 Mat. Age = maternal age; Gest. Age = gestational age; Edu. = maternal education, Gest. Age = gestational age, BFD = breastfeeding duration, SES = socioeconomic status (including proxies), Smoking Status = either self-reported or by serum cotinine concentrations, HOME score = Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment, Other Chemicals include heavy metals and PCBs.