Literature DB >> 30071987

Dynamic Trajectories of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Heart Failure.

Josep Lupón1, Giovana Gavidia-Bovadilla2, Elena Ferrer3, Marta de Antonio4, Alexandre Perera-Lluna5, Jorge López-Ayerbe3, Mar Domingo6, Julio Núñez7, Elisabet Zamora1, Pedro Moliner4, Patricia Díaz-Ruata8, Javier Santesmases6, Antoni Bayés-Genís9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term trajectories of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in heart failure (HF) are incompletely characterized.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine LVEF trajectories in HF with reduced LVEF (<40%) and mid-range LVEF (40% to 49%) and the prognostic impact of LVEF dynamic changes over 15-year follow-up.
METHODS: In this prospective, consecutive, observational registry of real-life HF outpatients, the authors performed 2-dimensional echocardiography at baseline and on a structured schedule after 1 year and then every 2 years up to 15 years.
RESULTS: The mean number of LVEF measurements in the 1,160 included patients was 3.6 ± 1.7. As a whole, Loess curves of long-term LVEF trajectories showed an inverted U shape with a marked rise in LVEF during the first year, maintained up to a decade, and a slow LVEF decline thereafter (p for trajectory <0.001). This pattern was more pronounced in HF of nonischemic origin and in women. Patients with new-onset HF (≤12 months) had a higher early increase in LVEF, whereas patients with ischemic HF showed a lower LVEF increase at 1 year; both groups had a relative plateau thereafter. Patients with HF with mid-range LVEF had less of an increase (3 ± 9%) than those with HF with reduced LVEF (9 ± 12%) during the first year (p < 0.001), but the groups overlapped after 15 years. Patients who died had lower final LVEF and worse LVEF dynamics in the immediately preceding period than survivors.
CONCLUSIONS: LVEF trajectories vary in HF depending on a number of disease modifiers, but an inverted U-shaped pattern with lower LVEF at both ends of the distribution emerged. A declining LVEF in the preceding period was associated with higher mortality.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ejection fraction; etiology; heart failure; long-term follow-up; ventricular function

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30071987     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  36 in total

Review 1.  Reverse Cardiac Remodeling and ARNI Therapy.

Authors:  Andrew Abboud; James L Januzzi
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2021-01-22

2.  Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction.

Authors:  Kazuaki Tanabe; Takahiro Sakamoto
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2018-09-14

3.  Detailed phenotyping reveals distinct trajectories of cardiovascular function and symptoms with exposure to modern breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Biniyam G Demissei; Brian S Finkelman; Rebecca A Hubbard; Liyong Zhang; Amanda M Smith; Karyn Sheline; Caitlin McDonald; Hari K Narayan; Vivek Narayan; Adam J Waxman; Susan M Domchek; Angela DeMichele; Payal Shah; Amy S Clark; Angela R Bradbury; Joseph R Carver; Jenica Upshaw; Saro H Armenian; Peter Liu; Bonnie Ky
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Josep Lupón; Antoni Bayes-Genis
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2018-12

5.  Longitudinal Trajectories of Hemodynamics Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Takeo Fujino; Aline Sayer; Daisuke Nitta; Teruhiko Imamura; Nikhil Narang; Ann Nguyen; Daniel Rodgers; Jayant Raikhelkar; Bryan Smith; Gene Kim; Colleen LaBuhn; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Daniel Burkhoff; Gabriel Sayer; Nir Uriel
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 5.712

6.  Relationship of ejection fraction and natriuretic peptide trajectories in heart failure with baseline reduced and mid-range ejection fraction.

Authors:  Kenneth C Bilchick; Patrick Stafford; Olusola Laja; Comfort Elumogo; Persey Bediako; Nora Tolbert; Douglas Sawch; Sthuthi David; Nishtha Sodhi; Anita Barber; Younghoon Kwon; Nishaki Mehta; Brandy Patterson; Khadijah Breathett; Sula Mazimba
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 7.  Cardiac Remodelling Following Cancer Therapy: A Review.

Authors:  Tan Panpan; Du Yuchen; Shi Xianyong; Liu Meng; He Ruijuan; Dong Ranran; Zhang Pengyan; Li Mingxi; Xie Rongrong
Journal:  Cardiovasc Toxicol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.755

Review 8.  Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction: from diagnosis to treatment. Gaps and dilemmas in current clinical practice.

Authors:  Marta Cvijic; Yelena Rib; Suzana Danojevic; Crina Ioana Radulescu; Natia Nazghaidze; Panos Vardas
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Peak systolic myocardial velocity in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: prognostic value and natural course.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Chin; Sehee Kim; Dongho Kim; Jae-Sik Nam; Kyungmi Kim; In-Cheol Choi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 1.977

10.  Reverse remodelling by sacubitril/valsartan predicts the prognosis in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Mi-Gil Moon; In-Chang Hwang; Wonsuk Choi; Goo-Yeong Cho; Yeonyee E Yoon; Jun-Bean Park; Seung-Pyo Lee; Hyung-Kwan Kim; Yong-Jin Kim
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.