Literature DB >> 30071961

Portal Vein Embolization: Correlation of Future Liver Remnant Hypertrophy to Type of Embolic Agent Used.

Surinder K Dhaliwal1, Ganesan Annamalai2, Nelofer Gafoor2, Robyn Pugash2, Chris Dey2, Elizabeth Nishani David2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of portal vein embolization (PVE) with different embolic agents used at our centre. Specifically, the effectiveness of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) glue is compared with that of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients (N = 77) who underwent PVE at our institution over a 5-year period. Pre- and postprocedural computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, when available, were used to measure the volume of total liver volume and future liver remnant (FLR). The absolute values obtained were used to calculate percentage of FLR. The growth in FLR was determined 4-6 weeks after PVE. Technical details of the procedure including the type and amount of embolic agent used were obtained from the chart reviews, electronic patient records, and radiology reports. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, and the Spearman correlation coefficient with post hoc analysis. Results are expressed as mean ± SD (P < .05 considered statistically significant).
RESULTS: NBCA (n = 29) produced a mean change in FLR of 14.8% compared with 9.3% for PVA particles (n = 24; P = .007). Mean change in FLR was 10.1% in the group where a combination of NBCA and PVA particles was used (n = 24). The effect of glue volume and glue-to-lipiodol ratio on the outcome was not found to be statistically significant (P = .5 and .7, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that NBCA glue is a better embolic agent than PVA particles in inducing liver hypertrophy. Crown
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Future liver remnant; Glue; Liver hypertrophy; Portal vein embolization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30071961     DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2018.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J        ISSN: 0846-5371            Impact factor:   2.248


  3 in total

Review 1.  Imaging-guided interventions modulating portal venous flow: Evidence and controversies.

Authors:  Roberto Cannella; Lambros Tselikas; Fréderic Douane; François Cauchy; Pierre-Emmanuel Rautou; Rafael Duran; Maxime Ronot
Journal:  JHEP Rep       Date:  2022-04-04

2.  Effect of Inhibiting Tumor Angiogenesis After Embolization in the Treatment of HCC with Apatinib-Loaded p(N-Isopropyl-Acrylamide-co-Butyl Methyl Acrylate) Temperature-Sensitive Nanogel.

Authors:  Chen Zhou; Qin Shi; Jiacheng Liu; Songjiang Huang; Chongtu Yang; Bin Xiong
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2020-12-31

3.  Predictive Factors for Hypertrophy of the Future Liver Remnant After Portal Vein Embolization: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  E A Soykan; B M Aarts; M Lopez-Yurda; K F D Kuhlmann; J I Erdmann; N Kok; K P van Lienden; E A Wilthagen; R G H Beets-Tan; O M van Delden; F M Gomez; E G Klompenhouwer
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.740

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.