| Literature DB >> 30071659 |
Robin Johns1, Zhao-Feng Chen2, Lufei Young3, Flordelis Delacruz4, Nien-Tzu Chang5, Chong Ho Yu6, S Pamela K Shiao7,8.
Abstract
The purpose of this updated meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of nitric oxide synthase-3 (NOS3) G894T polymorphisms, air pollution and their interaction on ischemic heart disease (IHD) risk across populations worldwide. Recursive partition trees, nonlinear association curve fit and geographic information system maps were incorporated to verify results of conventional pooled analyses for sources of heterogeneity. Results from 61 studies (16,219 cases, 12,222 controls) revealed a significant increased relative risk (RR) of IHD associated with NOS3 894 polymorphisms TT (RR = 1.44) and GT (RR = 1.37). Subgroup analysis revealed that the TT polymorphism genotype had significantly increased risk of IHD in Caucasian, East Asian, South Asian, and Middle Eastern populations (all p < 0.05). It is important to point out that many countries demonstrated an average risk of greater than two, which identifies the NOS3 894 TT polymorphism as a potential causal factor and biological marker of IHD, based on criteria for strong evidence used in international consensus panels. These 10 countries include Ukraine, the United Kingdom, Brazil, Chile, Japan, South Korea, India, Iran, Egypt and Morocco. For these countries with elevated risk (RR > 2) from the NOS3 894 TT polymorphism, meta-predictive analysis demonstrated an increasing trend in air pollution association with increased NOS3 894 polymorphisms. Further studies are needed to explore the complexity of the associations among NOS3 gene polymorphisms per population stratifications within countries, detailed air pollution data for added specificity for geographic location across time, and disease risk.Entities:
Keywords: NOS3 G894T gene; cardiovascular disease; ischemic heart disease; meta-analysis
Year: 2018 PMID: 30071659 PMCID: PMC6161281 DOI: 10.3390/toxics6030044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxics ISSN: 2305-6304
Figure 1Progression of the selection of studies for the meta-analysis.
Pooled meta-analysis: NOS3 G894T genotypes and risk for ischemic heart disease (IHD).
| Genotype | Cases | Controls | Tests of Association | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Number of Studies) | Model | RR (95% CI) | |||
| TT (61) | 1551 (9.56) | 759 (6.21) | Random | 1.44 (1.23, 1.67) | 0.0001 |
| Caucasian (25) | 1230 (12.30) | 593 (10.21) | Random | 1.30 (1.08, 1.56) | 0.0051 |
| Hispanic (2) | 33 (6.00) | 17 (4.43) | Fixed | 1.34 (0.76, 2.34) | 0.3044 |
| East Asian (18) | 79 (2.60) | 26 (0.74) | Fixed | 2.17 (1.46, 3.25) | 0.0001 |
| South Asian (6) | 40 (4.16) | 18 (2.08) | Fixed | 2.11 (1.21, 3.65) | 0.0076 |
| Middle East (4) | 65 (9.31) | 25 (4.26) | Fixed | 2.35 (1.47, 3.74) | 0.0003 |
| African (6) | 104 (10.54) | 80 (8.06) | Random | 1.45 (0.87, 2.41) | 0.1457 |
| GT (61) | 6066 (37.40) | 3971 (32.49) | Random | 1.37 (1.18, 1.57) | 0.0001 |
| Caucasian (25) | 4271 (42.71) | 2538 (43.69) | Random | 0.96 (0.91, 1.02) | 0.2571 |
| Hispanic (2) | 175 (31.81) | 126 (32.81) | Fixed | 0.96 (0.79, 1.16) | 0.6801 |
| East Asian (18) | 672 (22.12) | 518 (14.66) | Random | 1.38 (1.19, 1.59) | 0.0001 |
| South Asian (6) | 286 (29.79) | 229 (26.44) | Fixed | 1.17 (1.01, 1.36) | 0.0304 |
| Middle East (4) | 272 (38.96) | 180 (30.61) | Random | 1.25 (0.92, 1.70) | 0.1388 |
| African (6) | 390 (39.55) | 380 (38.27) | Random | 1.02 (0.83, 1.26) | 0.8032 |
| GG (61) | 8613 (53.10) | 7442 (60.89) | Random | 0.92 (0.89, 0.95) | 0.0001 |
| Caucasian (25) | 4498 (44.98) | 2677 (46.09) | Random | 0.95 (0.89, 1.01) | 0.139 |
| Hispanic (2) | 342 (62.18) | 241 (62.76) | Fixed | 0.99 (0.89, 1.10) | 0.9341 |
| East Asian (18) | 2286 (75.27) | 2989 (84.60) | Random | 0.91 (0.87, 0.95) | 0.0001 |
| South Asian (6) | 634 (66.04) | 619 (71.48) | Random | 0.97 (0.84, 1.13) | 0.7656 |
| Middle East (4) | 361 (51.72) | 383 (65.14) | Fixed | 0.77 (0.70, 0.85) | 0.0001 |
| African (6) | 492 (49.90) | 533 (53.68) | Random | 0.91 (0.76, 1.07) | 0.2809 |
| TT + GT (61) | 7617 (46.96) | 4730 (38.70) | Random | 1.15 (1.09, 1.22) | 0.0001 |
| Caucasian (25) | 5501 (55.01) | 3131 (53.90) | Random | 1.03 (0.98, 1.09) | 0.176 |
| Hispanic (2) | 208 (37.81) | 143 (37.24) | Fixed | 1.00 (0.85, 1.19) | 0.9339 |
| East Asian (18) | 751 (24.73) | 544 (15.40) | Random | 1.44 (1.26, 1.64) | 0.0001 |
| South Asian (6) | 326 (33.96) | 247 (28.52) | Fixed | 1.24 (1.08, 1.43) | 0.0018 |
| Middle East (4) | 337 (48.28) | 205 (34.86) | Fixed | 1.42 (1.24, 1.63) | 0.0001 |
| African (6) | 494 (50.10) | 460 (46.32) | Random | 1.10 (0.92, 1.33) | 0.2638 |
| T allele (61) | 4585 (28.20) | 2744 (22.5) | Random | 1.18 (1.11, 1.25) | 0.0001 |
| Caucasian (25) | 3366 (33.66) | 1862 (32.05) | Random | 1.07 (1.00, 1.16) | 0.0466 |
| Hispanic (2) | 120 (21.82) | 80 (20.83) | Fixed | 1.04 (0.81, 1.34) | 0.7399 |
| East Asian (18) | 415 (13.66) | 285 (8.06) | Fixed | 1.48 (1.28, 1.71) | 0.0001 |
| South Asian (6) | 183 (19.06) | 132 (15.24) | Fixed | 1.30 (1.06, 1.60) | 0.0106 |
| Middle East (4) | 201 (28.80) | 115 (19.56) | Fixed | 1.52 (1.24, 1.87) | 0.0001 |
| African (6) | 299 (30.32) | 270 (27.19) | Fixed | 1.10 (0.95, 1.26) | 0.1743 |
| G allele (61) | 11646 (71.80) | 9428 (77.2) | Random | 0.95 (0.93, 0.97) | 0.0001 |
| Caucasian (25) | 6634 (66.34) | 3946 (67.94) | Random | 0.96 (0.92,0.99) | 0.0304 |
| Hispanic (2) | 429 (78.00) | 304 (79.17) | Fixed | 0.98 (0.92, 1.05) | 0.7404 |
| East Asian (18) | 2622 (86.34) | 3248 (91.93) | Fixed | 0.95 (0.93, 0.97) | 0.0001 |
| South Asian (6) | 777 (80.94) | 734 (84.76) | Random | 1.02 (0.89, 1.16) | 0.7493 |
| Middle East (4) | 497 (71.20) | 473 (80.44) | Fixed | 0.87 (0.82, 0.93) | 0.0001 |
| African (6) | 687 (69.68) | 723 (72.81) | Fixed | 0.96 (0.90, 1.01) | 0.1761 |
Note: CI = confidence interval; RR = risk ratio. Random effects models were used when Q or I2 were significant; otherwise, fixed effects models were used.
Figure 2Forest plot for countries with pooled relative risk (RR) > 2 for the meta-analysis of the association between the NOS3 TT genotype and ischemic heart disease (IHD). The midpoint = point effect estimate for each study. The area of the box = weight given to the study. The length of the line = 95% confidence interval for the effect estimate in an individual study. The width of the diamond = 95% confidence interval for the overall effect estimate. Note * (excluded): study excluded due to no TT genotypes reported for case/control groups.
Figure 3Geographical information map for % NOS3 GT and TT genotypes per control and ischemic heart disease (IHD) groups, and IHD risk.
Figure 4Nonlinear fit of NOS3 G894T polymorphisms with death from air pollution bi-variate plots for countries with pooled RR > 2: (a) TT plus GT polymorphisms, (b) TT only (AP death: Death rates from air pollution, Levels per million: 2 = 51–100, 3 = 101–250, 4 = 251–400 and greater); case = red (solid line), control = blue (dotted line).