Literature DB >> 30071117

Age-related changes in estradiol and longitudinal associations with fat mass in men.

Albert Wu1, Zumin Shi1, Sean Martin1, Andrew Vincent1, Leonie Heilbronn1, Gary Wittert1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: In men, circulating 17β-estradiol originates primarily from peripheral aromatization of testosterone particularly in adipose tissue. The effect of ageing and obesity on circulating estradiol remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE: Determine five-year changes in serum estradiol and the association with testosterone and fat mass in Australian men.
DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. At baseline and five-year follow-up, socio-demographic and health-related data including behaviors, chronic conditions, and medication use were collected by questionnaire. Estradiol and testosterone were assayed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and sex hormone-binding globulin by immunochemiluminescent assay. Fat mass was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling men aged 35 years and older at enrollment, resident in the northern and western suburbs of Adelaide without established disease of, or medications affecting, the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal axis (n = 725). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The dependence of change in serum estradiol over five years on age, testosterone and fat mass after adjustment for multiple confounders.
RESULTS: At baseline, mean age was 53.0 ± 10.8 years. Mean serum estradiol levels at baseline and five-year follow-up were 94.9 ± 34.8 and 89.4 ± 30.4 pmol/L respectively (-1.1 pmol/L/year). On multivariable analyses, estradiol change was associated with changes in testosterone (B-estimate = 2.719, standard error = 0.369, p˂0.001), but not age or total fat mass. Change in testosterone/estradiol ratio was inversely associated with change in fat mass (B = -1.450, SE = 0.575, p = 0.012), and this was consistent across quartiles of fat mass change.
CONCLUSIONS: In healthy men, circulating estradiol is primarily dependent on testosterone. With increasing fat mass, estradiol decreases less than testosterone. From a clinical standpoint these data indicate that obesity is associated with a change in the testosterone to estradiol ratio, but a change in estradiol does not occur unless some other pathology is present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30071117      PMCID: PMC6072119          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Most circulating 17β-estradiol in men is produced from aromatization of testosterone, predominantly in adipose tissue [1]. At present, the relative effects of age, fat mass and testosterone on estradiol are unclear. Some previous studies measured estradiol using immunoassays which are inaccurate at the low levels found in men [2]. In cross-sectional studies which used immunoassays, estradiol levels have been variably reported to increase [3], decrease [4, 5] or remain unchanged [6, 7] with increasing age. Similarly in cross-sectional studies which used mass spectrometry, estradiol levels have been reported to increase [8, 9], remain stable [10] or decrease [11-13] with increasing age. A number of longitudinal studies have published data on longitudinal estradiol changes; however, they either do not specifically report the association between estradiol and age, or focus on bone health or mortality rather than adipose tissue [14, 15]. As far as we can determine, the only study which investigated the longitudinal change in estradiol with aging and incorporated body mass index (BMI) found that there was no change with aging [16]. This study used immunoassays to measure estradiol. Some previous studies have been limited by the use of BMI which is an inaccurate measure of fat mass especially in young men because BMI is also affected by muscle mass. Cross-sectional studies which used immunoassays to measure estradiol found positive [3, 5, 7, 17, 18] and no association [6] between estradiol and BMI, and positive [17-20] and no association [4, 6, 21] between estradiol and fat mass. Cross-sectional studies which used mass spectrometry found positive [8, 9, 13, 22, 23] and no association [12] between estradiol and BMI, and positive association [22, 23] between estradiol and fat mass. One longitudinal study which used immunoassays found no association between estradiol and BMI [16]. Thus, there are limitations in the currently published data on the associations between estradiol, and age and fat mass. To our knowledge, there are no studies which simultaneously use 1) longitudinal estradiol data measured using mass spectrometry, and 2) a direct measure of fat mass. We therefore determined, in a cohort of middle-aged and elderly men, the annualized changes in estradiol with age, fat mass and testosterone over a five-year period. Our hypothesis was that the change in serum estradiol over time follows any change in serum testosterone, an effect modified by fat mass. To test these hypotheses, we performed a 28-day overfeeding study on men and measured the change in adipose tissue aromatase expression.

Methods

The Florey Adelaide Male Ageing Study (FAMAS) cohort

The details of FAMAS have been previously published [24]. Briefly, FAMAS is a longitudinal cohort study of men residing in the community in the North West Suburbs of Adelaide and aged 35–80 years at enrollment. Data were collected from 1195 men at baseline (2002–2005) and from 950 men at five-year follow-up (2007–2010). Institutional review board approval was obtained and informed consent obtained from all participants. The analytic sample was selected as shown in Fig 1. Men who were taking a medication known to affect the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis (testosterone, antiandrogen, glucocorticoid, opioid, antiepileptic, antipsychotic, 5-α reductase inhibitor, aromatase inhibitor) currently or within the 6 months prior to the clinic visit were excluded. The final sample for analysis included 725 men (Fig 1).
Fig 1

Selection of sample for analysis.

Data on age, marital status, employment, health-related behaviors (e.g. smoking, alcohol, and physical activity), current and past health problems, and medication use were obtained by questionnaire [24]. Symptoms of depression were assessed using Beck Depression Inventory-IA [25]. Depression was defined as score ≥ 13. The presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was determined by self-reported clinician diagnosis, fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L or HbA1c ≥ 6.5%. Medication use was confirmed by data linkage with a national medication registry. During each clinic visit, weight, height and waist circumference were measured, and BMI calculated as previously described [24]. Whole and regional body composition was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) performed either on a fanbeam (Prodigy DF + 14759, Encore software version 9.15) or pencil-beam (DPX+, Lunar software version 4.7e) densitometer (both machines from GE Lunar, Madison, WI, USA), with identical protocols followed for both densitometers and both time points. Total fat mass, and lean mass (excludes bone mass) in kilograms were defined for whole body using default settings. For assessment of soft tissue composition in the abdominal region, the top of lumbar vertebrae L2 to the bottom of L4 and extending outward to a vertical line touching the inner edges of the rib cage was adopted as the customized anatomical setting. Percentage abdominal fat mass was computed as [abdominal fat mass/(abdominal fat mass + abdominal lean mass)] * 100. Previously published data demonstrated no significant differences between densitometers [26]. Additional validation studies were conducted in our laboratory, with means for body composition measures (fat mass, lean mass, bone mineral content, and bone mineral density) obtained using both densitometers in a subsample of FAMAS participants (n = 18; age range, 44–70 years; body mass range, 56–121 kg) found to be highly correlated (all r > 0.95); and small systematic differences were detected (weaker correlations, but all r > 0.82) for lean mass, bone mineral content, and fat mass percentage for older (<55 years vs 55+ years) and heavier men (<87 kg vs 87+ kg). Morning fasting blood samples were obtained by venipuncture and stored at -80°C and assays were carried out as previously described [27]. Briefly, validated stable isotope dilution LC-MS was used to measure total testosterone (interassay coefficient of variation/CV 9.3% at 0.43 nmol/L, 8.6% at 1.66 nmol/L, 4.0% at 8.17 nmol/L) and estradiol (interassay CV 14% at 23 pmol/L, 4.0% at 83 pmol/L, 6.0% at 408 pmol/L). Immunoassays were used to measure SHBG (interassay CV 4% at 32.3 nmol/L), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH, interassay CV 3.1% at 7.0 U/L) and luteinizing hormone (LH, interassay CV 4.0% at 7.7 U/L). Plasma glucose was measured using an automated chemistry analyzer system (interassay CV 2.5% at 3.5 mmol/L, 3.0% at 19.6 mmol/L). Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography using a spherical cation exchange gel (CV 2% at 6% of total hemoglobin). Annualized changes in measured parameters were determined by dividing the difference between baseline and follow-up values by the number of years between visits. Multivariable regressions were built for annualized change in estradiol and testosterone/estradiol ratio according to baseline and change in health factors. Independent variables that were considered to influence estradiol levels were selected based on previous studies and the authors’ judgement. Additional analyses were performed with SHBG removed from regressions due to multicollinearity between SHBG and fat mass. The statistics software R was used and p < 0.05 (two-tailed) was considered significant.

Adipose tissue aromatase expression in response to overfeeding

Adipose tissue aromatase mRNA was measured using cDNA remaining from 8 men without diabetes or cardiovascular disease who were participants in a 28-day overfeeding study. This study has previously been described [28]. Exclusion criteria included weight change of >2 kg over the preceding 6 months, >60 minutes of exercise per week, medications affecting insulin sensitivity or blood pressure. Institutional Human Ethics Review Board approval was obtained. All participants provided signed informed consent. This study is registered as a clinical trial at clinicaltrials.gov (registration number NCT00562393). From day -3 to day 0, participants were provided with their baseline energy requirements for weight maintenance (30% fat, 15% protein and 55% carbohydrate). On days 0–3 and 25–28, participants were provided with baseline energy requirements plus 5,200 kJ/day (45% fat, 15% protein and 40% carbohydrate). On days 3–25, participants were instructed to consume their regular diets with supplemental food provided to achieve an intake of 5,200 kJ/day above baseline energy requirements. Participants were weighed and compliance monitored weekly by the research nurse and dietitian. At baseline and after 28 days overfeeding, fat mass was measured by DXA as above (Lunar DPX GE Lunar, Lunar Corp, Madison, WI). Serum testosterone and estradiol were measured by a validated stable-isotope dilution LC-MS/MS [29]. A sample of periumbilical subcutaneous adipose tissue was obtained using needle biopsy [30]. Total RNA was extracted from 100–150 mg of adipose tissue using TRIzol reagent, and cDNA was synthesized using Omniscript RT kit and Recombinant RNAsin RNase inhibitor (Qiagen). Inventoried Taqman assays for Cyp19a and 18S were purchased from Life Technologies. qPCR was performed in duplicate, with negative controls, using the manufacturer’s recommended conditions on a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Data were analyzed using the 2−ΔCt method and an internal single reference gene, 18S. Statistical analysis was performed using R. Data at different time points were compared using paired t-tests. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The characteristics of the sample at baseline and follow-up are shown in Tables 1 and Table 2 shows changes in health factors during follow-up. At baseline, the mean age was 53.0 ± 10.8 years, 30.2% of the sample were obese (BMI ≥ 30), 20.2% were current smokers, 8.1% had T2DM and 6.8% had CVD. Mean serum estradiol levels at baseline and follow-up were 94.9 ± 34.8 and 89.4 ± 30.4 pmol/L respectively, a change of -1.1 pmol/L/y.
Table 1

Sample characteristics by study waves (n = 725).

Health factorsBaselineaFollow-up
Age (years)53.0 ± 10.858.0 ± 10.8
Sex hormones
   estradiol (pmol/L)94.9 ± 34.889.4 ± 30.4
   total testosterone (nmol/L)17.2 ± 5.516.2 ± 5.2
   sex hormone-binding globulin (nmol/L)33.1 ± 13.337.0 ± 13.9
   luteinizing hormone (U/L)4.9 ± 2.34.3 ± 2.0
   follicle-stimulating hormone (U/L)7.0 ± 5.67.7 ± 5.6
Percentage total fat mass27.1 ± 6.928.8 ± 6.4
   n/ab (n)4946
Percentage abdominal fat mass33.8 ± 7.936.3 ± 8.1
   n/a (n)4949
Marital status
   married/partnered598 (82.7%)573 (81.9%)
   no125 (17.3%)127 (18.1%)
   n/a225
Employment status
   employed493 (68.1%)422 (60.1%)
   unemployed13 (1.8%)17 (2.4%)
   retired158 (21.8%)216 (30.8%)
   other60 (8.3%)47 (6.7%)
   n/a123
Smoking status
   non-smoker266 (36.8%)269 (37.8%)
   ex-smoker310 (42.9%)325 (45.7%)
   current smoker146 (20.2%)117 (16.5%)
   n/a314
Body mass index (kg/m2)28.4 ± 4.228.7 ± 4.4
Body mass index (kg/m2)
   < 25147 (20.3%)135 (18.6%)
   25–30359 (49.5%)354 (48.8%)
   ≥ 30219 (30.2%)236 (32.6%)
Waist circumference (cm)
   < 95238 (32.8%)272 (37.6%)
   95–100141 (19.4%)123 (17.0%)
   ≥ 100346 (47.7%)329 (45.4%)
   n/a01
Depression
   no648 (92.6%)622 (91.7%)
   yes52 (7.4%)56 (8.3%)
   n/a2547
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
   no666 (91.9%)610 (84.1%)
   yes59 (8.1%)115 (15.9%)
Cardiovascular disease
   no676 (93.2%)661 (91.2%)
   yes49 (6.8%)64 (8.8%)

aData expressed as mean ± standard deviation, or n (%)

bn/a, not measured or reported

Table 2

Changes in health factors between baseline and follow-up (n = 725).

Changes in health factorsn (%)
Married/partnered
   not married/partnered at both times101 (14.4%)
   became married/partnered20 (2.9%)
   no longer married/partnered25 (3.6%)
   married/partnered at both times553 (79.1%)
   n/aa26
Retired during follow-up
   no634 (90.3%)
   yes68 (9.7%)
   n/a23
Smoking status
   non-smoker at both times552 (77.7%)
   became a smoker14 (2.0%)
   no longer a smoker41 (5.8%)
   smoker at both times103 (14.5%)
   n/a15
Depression
   not depressed at both times584 (88.6%)
   became depressed28 (4.2%)
   no longer depressed21 (3.2%)
   depressed at both times26 (3.9%)
   n/a66
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
   no diabetes at both times610 (84.1%)
   developed diabetes56 (7.7%)
   had diabetes at baseline59 (8.1%)
Cardiovascular disease
   no disease at both times646 (89.1%)
   developed disease30 (4.1%)
   had disease at baseline49 (6.8%)
Annualized change in sex hormonesb
   estradiol (pmol/L)-1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
   total testosterone (nmol/L)-0.2 (-0.3, -0.2)
   sex hormone-binding globulin (nmol/L)0.8 (0.6, 0.9)
   luteinizing hormone (U/L)-0.1 (-0.2, -0.1)
   follicle-stimulating hormone (U/L)0.1 (0.1, 0.2)
Annualized change in percentage total fat massb0.3 (0.3, 0.4)
   n/a88
Annualized change in percentage abdominal fat massb0.5 (0.4, 0.6)
   n/a90

an/a, not measured or reported

bData expressed as mean (95% confidence interval)

aData expressed as mean ± standard deviation, or n (%) bn/a, not measured or reported an/a, not measured or reported bData expressed as mean (95% confidence interval) In multivariable regression of annualized change in estradiol, estradiol change was not predicted by baseline age, total percentage fat mass or testosterone (Table 3). There was, however, a strong association of annualized change in estradiol with testosterone change but not with fat mass change or age (Table 4). Change in SHBG was inversely associated with the change in estradiol (p = 0.005), but this was no longer significant after testosterone was removed from the regression (estimate = 0.061, p = 0.685). The association of change in estradiol with testosterone change remained significant after SHBG was removed (estimate = 2.264, p < 0.001).
Table 3

Multivariable regression for annualized change in estradiol according to baseline health factors.

n = 651 due to missing data. R2 = 0.020; adjusted R2 = 0.005.

Annualized change in estradiol (pmol/L)
Baseline health factorsEstimatep-value
Age (years)-0.0350.237
Total testosterone (nmol/L)-0.0860.187
Sex hormone-binding globulin (nmol/L)0.0460.107
Marital status
   married/partnered0.000
   no-0.2980.676
Smoking status
   non-smoker0.000
   ex-smoker0.2920.618
   current smoker-0.4080.575
Percentage total fat mass-0.0110.788
Depression
   no0.000
   yes1.6480.104
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
   no0.000
   yes-1.0630.285
Cardiovascular disease
   no0.000
   yes-1.9620.070

*p < 0.05

Table 4

Multivariable regression for annualized change in estradiol according to changes in health factors.

n = 576 due to missing data. R2 = 0.116; adjusted R2 = 0.087.

Annualized change in estradiol (pmol/L)
Changes in health factorsEstimatep-value
Age (years)-0.0060.821
Annualized change in testosterone (nmol/L)2.719< 0.001*
Annualized change in SHBG (nmol/L)-0.4530.005*
Married/partnered
   not married/partnered at both times0.000
   became married/partnered-3.1440.082
   no longer married/partnered-1.2440.421
   married/partnered at both times-0.4100.593
Retired during follow-up
   no0.000
   yes0.0110.990
Smoking status
   non-smoker at both times0.000
   became a smoker0.0600.975
   no longer a smoker-0.0940.931
   smoker at both times-0.3290.676
Annualized change in percentage total fat mass0.2420.393
Depression
   not depressed at both times0.000
   became depressed-0.9030.468
   no longer depressed0.1490.919
   depressed at both times1.7770.190
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
   no diabetes at both times0.000
   developed diabetes-0.2460.800
   had diabetes at baseline-1.8850.064
Cardiovascular disease
   no disease at both times0.000
   developed disease1.6930.217
   had disease at baseline-1.8370.098

*p < 0.05

Multivariable regression for annualized change in estradiol according to baseline health factors.

n = 651 due to missing data. R2 = 0.020; adjusted R2 = 0.005. *p < 0.05

Multivariable regression for annualized change in estradiol according to changes in health factors.

n = 576 due to missing data. R2 = 0.116; adjusted R2 = 0.087. *p < 0.05 In multivariable regression, the annualized change in testosterone/estradiol ratio was not associated with annualized change in percentage total fat mass (estimate = -0.763, p = 0.179). The association became significant after SHBG was removed from the regression (estimate = -1.450, p = 0.012) (Table 5). In addition, this inverse relationship between testosterone/estradiol change and change in fat mass was consistent across quartiles of percentage total fat mass change (Fig 2).
Table 5

Multivariable regression for annualized change in testosterone/estradiol ratio according to changes in health factors.

n = 576 due to missing data. R2 = 0.051; adjusted R2 = 0.023.

Annualized change in testosterone/estradiol
Changes in health factorsEstimatep-value
Age (years)-0.0180.753
Married/partnered
   not married/partnered at both times0.000
   became married/partnered3.3230.374
   no longer married/partnered1.7710.580
   married/partnered at both times3.8240.016*
Retired during follow-up
   no0.000
   yes-0.2030.915
Smoking status
   non-smoker at both times0.000
   became a smoker3.3890.395
   no longer a smoker-3.1420.161
   smoker at both times1.9660.227
Annualized change in percentage total fat mass-1.4500.012*
Depression
   not depressed at both times0.000
   became depressed2.9910.246
   no longer depressed4.2720.160
   depressed at both times-2.4100.391
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
   no diabetes at both times0.000
   developed diabetes2.2090.272
   had diabetes at baseline2.2360.288
Cardiovascular disease
   no disease at both times0.000
   developed disease-3.0560.282
   had disease at baseline2.0670.369

*p < 0.05

Fig 2

Trends in annualized change in testosterone/estradiol ratio according to quartiles of fat mass change after adjustment for changes in health factors apart from SHBG.

n = 576 due to missing data. R2 = 0.058; adjusted R2 = 0.027.

Trends in annualized change in testosterone/estradiol ratio according to quartiles of fat mass change after adjustment for changes in health factors apart from SHBG.

n = 576 due to missing data. R2 = 0.058; adjusted R2 = 0.027.

Multivariable regression for annualized change in testosterone/estradiol ratio according to changes in health factors.

n = 576 due to missing data. R2 = 0.051; adjusted R2 = 0.023. *p < 0.05 When all the above analyses were repeated using percentage abdominal fat mass instead of percentage total fat mass, the associations remained similar (data not shown). The inverse relationship between changes in testosterone/estradiol and fat mass remained strong when percentage abdominal fat mass was used as a continuous variable (estimate = -1.269, p = 0.007) but the relationship was not consistent across quartiles of fat mass change.

Overfeeding study

The 8 men had a mean age of 36.1 ± 6.6 years and BMI of 26.8 ± 3.5 kg/m2. During the 28 days of overfeeding, body weight increased from 83.9 ± 12.2 kg to 86.2 ± 12.2 kg (p = 0.009) and percentage fat mass increased from 29.6 ± 7.7 to 31.1 ± 7.4 (p = 0.032). Aromatase mRNA expression did not change (p = 0.086) (Fig 3). Serum estradiol, testosterone and testosterone/estradiol ratio did not change (p = 0.907, p = 0.268, p = 0.773 respectively).
Fig 3

Aromatase mRNA expression in subcutaneous adipose tissue during 28 days overfeeding experiment.

Discussion

Using longitudinal data from a large sample of men, we found that estradiol change was not independently associated with increasing age or fat mass. However, estradiol change did have a strong direct association with testosterone change, suggesting that estradiol levels are predominantly dependent on testosterone. In addition, testosterone to estradiol conversion had a direct association with change in fat mass. In the overfeeding study, we found no change in adipose tissue aromatase expression with weight gain. Our finding that estradiol remains stable with increasing age is consistent with previous longitudinal data from the Framingham Heart Study which used immunoassay to measure estradiol [16]. Our data are also consistent with previous cross-sectional studies which used immunoassay [6, 7] and pooled data (n = 10,904) using mass spectrometry from three large observational studies in Australia [10]. In contrast, some cross-sectional studies have found that estradiol increases with aging using immunoassay [3] and mass spectrometry [8, 9], and others have found that estradiol decreases with aging using immunoassay [4, 5] and mass spectrometry [11-13]. The reasons for these discrepancies are unclear and cannot be entirely attributed to the use of immunoassay. Among studies that contained longitudinal estradiol data [14, 15], one investigated the association between BMI and estradiol [16], and found no association. Using more precise measurements of fat mass and estradiol, we similarly find no association between changes in estradiol and fat mass. In contrast, we observe a strong independent relationship between changes in estradiol and testosterone suggesting that a falling testosterone level with increasing age is the primary determinant of change in estradiol. Our data also show that the rate of decline of estradiol is less than the rate of decline in testosterone, and this can partly be explained by the degree of obesity. Studies have found an association between fat mass and testosterone to estradiol conversion. For example, studies have demonstrated that weight loss in men leads to decreases in estradiol and testosterone to estradiol conversion [31, 32]. In addition, in men administered testosterone, older men had higher estradiol and estradiol/testosterone ratio than younger men, which could be partly explained by the higher percentage fat mass in older men [33]. One possible explanation for these observations is that with the increased mass of adipose tissue, the overall aromatase activity is increased. An alternative explanation is that there is an increased expression of aromatase per unit of adipose tissue. To investigate these possibilities, we examined the effect of overfeeding 8 men an energy dense diet for 28 days, and found no change in aromatase expression in response to acute experimental overfeeding and weight gain. Therefore, we propose that increase in total fat mass is accompanied by an increase in overall aromatase activity which reduces the fall in estradiol relative to testosterone. We cannot exclude the possibility that aromatase expression increases in the visceral adipose tissue; however, we did find that testosterone to estradiol conversion was independently associated with both percentage total as well as abdominal fat mass. The study cohort consisted of urban Adelaide-dwelling primarily Caucasian men which may limit generalizability of the findings to other ethnicities and geographic regions. A further limitation of this study is the observational nature which precludes any direct inferences about causality. Furthermore, the overfeeding experiment had limited subjects which limits the power of its findings. In summary, using a longitudinal study of men, we found that estradiol change was predominantly dependent on change in testosterone rather than ageing or fat mass. Testosterone to estradiol conversion increased with increasing fat mass, possibly due to increased overall aromatase activity.

Main study data set.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Overfeeding study data set.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  33 in total

1.  Gonadal steroids and body composition, strength, and sexual function in men.

Authors:  Joel S Finkelstein; Hang Lee; Sherri-Ann M Burnett-Bowie; J Carl Pallais; Elaine W Yu; Lawrence F Borges; Brent F Jones; Christopher V Barry; Kendra E Wulczyn; Bijoy J Thomas; Benjamin Z Leder
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Association between sex hormones and adiposity: qualitative differences in women and men in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Morgana L Mongraw-Chaffin; Cheryl A M Anderson; Matthew A Allison; Pamela Ouyang; Moyses Szklo; Dhananjay Vaidya; Mark Woodward; Sherita Hill Golden
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Body fatness and sex steroid hormone concentrations in US men: results from NHANES III.

Authors:  Sabine Rohrmann; Meredith S Shiels; David S Lopez; Nader Rifai; William G Nelson; Norma Kanarek; Eliseo Guallar; Andy Menke; Corinne E Joshu; Manning Feinleib; Siobhan Sutcliffe; Elizabeth A Platz
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Relationship of sex steroid hormones with body size and with body composition measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in US men.

Authors:  Britton Trabert; Barry I Graubard; Sarah J Nyante; Nader Rifai; Gary Bradwin; Elizabeth A Platz; Geraldine M McQuillan; Katherine A McGlynn
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Serum sex steroids and steroidogenesis-related enzyme expression in skeletal muscle during experimental weight gain in men.

Authors:  K Sato; D Samocha-Bonet; D J Handelsman; S Fujita; G A Wittert; L K Heilbronn
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 6.041

6.  Moderate weight loss in obese and overweight men preserves bone quality.

Authors:  L Claudia Pop; Deeptha Sukumar; Katherine Tomaino; Yvette Schlussel; Stephen H Schneider; Chris L Gordon; Xiangbing Wang; Sue A Shapses
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Age-specific population centiles for androgen status in men.

Authors:  D J Handelsman; B Yeap; L Flicker; S Martin; G A Wittert; Lam P Ly
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 6.664

8.  Serum testosterone, dihydrotestosterone and estradiol concentrations in older men self-reporting very good health: the healthy man study.

Authors:  Gideon Sartorius; Sasa Spasevska; Amanda Idan; Leo Turner; Elise Forbes; Anna Zamojska; Carolyn A Allan; Lam P Ly; Ann J Conway; Robert I McLachlan; David J Handelsman
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.478

9.  Visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in relation to circulating androgens, sex hormone-binding globulin, and luteinizing hormone in young men.

Authors:  Torben Leo Nielsen; Claus Hagen; Kristian Wraae; Kim Brixen; Per Hyltoft Petersen; Egil Haug; Rasmus Larsen; Marianne Andersen
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  The Florey Adelaide Male Ageing Study (FAMAS): design, procedures & participants.

Authors:  Sean A Martin; Matthew T Haren; Sue M Middleton; Gary A Wittert
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The Translational Role of Animal Models for Estrogen-Related Functional Bladder Outlet Obstruction and Prostatic Inflammation.

Authors:  Risto Santti; Emrah Yatkin; Jenni Bernoulli; Tomi Streng
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-31

2.  Peritraumatic 17β-estradiol levels influence chronic posttraumatic pain outcomes.

Authors:  Sarah D Linnstaedt; Matthew C Mauck; Esther Y Son; Andrew S Tungate; Yue Pan; Cathleen Rueckeis; Shan Yu; Megan Lechner; Elizabeth Datner; Bruce A Cairns; Teresa Danza; Marc-Anthony Velilla; Claire Pearson; Jeffrey W Shupp; David J Smith; Samuel A McLean
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Hormonal patterns in men with prediabetes and diabetes in NHANES III: possible links with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kerri Beckmann; Danielle Crawley; William G Nelson; Elizabeth A Platz; Elizabeth Selvin; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Sabine Rohrmann
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.532

4.  Serum Omentin Levels in Patients with Prostate Cancer and Associations with Sex Steroids and Metabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Artur Borowski; Lucyna Siemińska
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  The Role of Diet and Weight Loss in Improving Secondary Hypogonadism in Men with Obesity with or without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Vito Angelo Giagulli; Marco Castellana; Isanna Murro; Carla Pelusi; Edoardo Guastamacchia; Vincenzo Triggiani; Giovanni De Pergola
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Interactive Effects of Unhealthy Lifestyle Behaviors on Testicular Function among Healthy Adult Men: A Cross-Sectional Study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Adi Lukas Kurniawan; Chien-Yeh Hsu; Jane C-J Chao; Li-Yin Lin; Rathi Paramastri; Hsiu-An Lee; Nan-Chen Hsieh; Shu-Fang Vivienne Wu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.