| Literature DB >> 30071033 |
Xiang Li1,2, Baojun Yang3, Huaili Zheng2, Pei Wu1, Guoming Zeng1.
Abstract
Poly(lactic acid) has been extensively invesEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30071033 PMCID: PMC6071980 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The synthetic route of (LTi-O)2.
Fig 2FTIR spectra of L and (LTi-O)2.
Fig 3TG/DSC analysis of (LTi-O)2.
Fig 4ROP of D, L-LA employing (LTi-O)2 as catalyst.
Fig 5Effect of molar ratio of monomer (D, L-LA) and catalyst ((LTi-O)2) (a), reaction time (b) and polymerization temperature (c) on ROP of D, L-LA.
Fig 6ROP kinetics: Second-order kinetic plots for D, L-LA polymerization vs. time with different catalyst concentrations at 160°C and [M0] = 0.1mol·L-1(a); Double-logarithmic line fitting of kobs vs. [(LTi-O)2] with different catalyst concentrations at 160°C and [M0] = 0.1mol·L-1(b).
The kobs and equation of logarithm linear regression of kobs with [(LTi-O)2] at different reaction temperature.
| kobs / mol-1·h-1 | Eq. of linear regression | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T/°C | [(LTi-O)2]/ m mol·L-1 | ||||||
| 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.25 | ||
| 140 | 0.76 | 0.91 | 1.20 | 1.80 | 2.40 | 3.73 | y = 0.9923x+2.6390, R2 = 0.9923 |
| 150 | 1.26 | 1.51 | 2.01 | 3.00 | 3.98 | 6.18 | y = 0.9873x+3.1026, R2 = 0.9947 |
| 160 | 3.26 | 3.89 | 5.14 | 7.63 | 10.09 | 15.58 | y = 0.9724x+3.9032, R2 = 0.9975 |
| 170 | 4.38 | 5.25 | 7.00 | 10.51 | 14.01 | 21.89 | y = 1.0002x+4.4739, R2 = 0.9962 |
| 180 | 7.54 | 9.05 | 12.06 | 18.11 | 24.15 | 37.75 | y = 1.0012x+5.0273, R2 = 0.9987 |
Fig 7Semi-logarithmic line fitting of k vs. 1000/T ([M]0 = 0.1 mol· L−1).
Static water contact angle and 24h water-uptake ratios of polymers.
| Samples | Static water contact angle | 24h water-uptake ratios |
|---|---|---|
| PDLLA-1 | 100.0±0.01 | 1.42±0.32 |
| PDLLA-2 | 83.8±0.02 | 2.03±0.26 |
a PDLLA-1 (Mn = 9.20×104 mol· L-1, PDI = 1.13); PDLLA-2 (Mn = 9.01×104 mol· L-1, PDI = 1.33)
b All the experiments were conducted in 3 parallel experiments, and the average values were calculated and used as the result for the subsequent analysis.
Fig 8Degradation property of polymers: the change of weight loss (a), water-uptake ratios (a) and pH (b) with time.
Fig 9Cell morphology at 3th day of culture: on glass(a); on PDLLA-1 (b); on PDLLA-2(c).
Fig 10Growth curves of osteoblasts cells on materials.
The relative average proliferation rate of cells in different time periods.
| Relative average proliferation rate(%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Culture days | ||
| 0→2 | 2→4 | 4→6 | |
| Glass | 46.8 | 28.2 | 13.7 |
| PDLLA-1 | 29.5 | 52.2 | 46.7 |
| PDLLA-2 | 27.7 | 49.8 | 43.6 |