Literature DB >> 30070927

A systematic review of the barriers and facilitators to the provision and use of low-tech and unaided AAC systems for people with complex communication needs and their families.

A Moorcroft1, N Scarinci1, C Meyer1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Speech-language pathologists may introduce augmentative or alternative communication (AAC) systems to people who are unable to use speech for everyday communication. Despite the benefits of AAC systems, they are significantly underutilized by the people with complex communication needs. The current review aimed to synthesize the barriers and facilitators to the provision and use of low-tech and unaided AAC systems.  Materials and methods: Relevant literature was identified via a systematic search strategy. Included articles (n = 43) were evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Qualitative framework analysis was then completed with reference to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF).  Results and conclusion: Most barriers and facilitators were coded as contextual factors within the ICF. Of most prominence were environmental factors, including attitudes of and supports provided by professionals, family members, and the society at large. Themes were also identified which related to the personal factors, including the user's own attitude, socioeconomic status, and culture. Beyond these contextual factors, the remaining codes related to body functions such as cognition and movement. There are numerous barriers to the provision and use of low-tech and unaided AAC systems, which may contribute to the inadequate use of these systems by people with complex communication needs. Suggestions for reducing these barriers are presented with regards to the person with complex communication needs, their family, and the professionals involved in their care. Implications for Rehabilitation AAC systems can reduce participation restrictions for people with complex communication needs. The provision and use of AAC systems is influenced by environmental factors, personal factors, and features of a person's body function. SLPs may need to collaborate with a large multidisciplinary team to successfully introduce AAC systems. SLP, teaching, and nursing students require theoretical and practical experience in AAC throughout their training to enable the provision and use of these systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC); Disability and Health (ICF); International Classification of Functioning; barriers and facilitators; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30070927     DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1499135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol        ISSN: 1748-3107


  7 in total

1.  Frequency and correlates of augmentative and alternative communication use in an autistic inpatient sample.

Authors:  Elizabeth A DeLucia; Tyler C McFayden; Megan Fok; Theresa M Andrzejewski; Angela Scarpa; Christina G McDonnell
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2022-07-07

Review 2.  Parents' Perceptions and Experiences with Their Children's Use of Augmentative/Alternative Communication: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.

Authors:  Carmen Berenguer; Eva Rosa Martínez; Simona De Stasio; Inmaculada Baixauli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Evaluating the perspectives of those with severe physical impairments while learning BCI control of a commercial augmentative and alternative communication paradigm.

Authors:  Kevin M Pitt; Jonathan S Brumberg
Journal:  Assist Technol       Date:  2021-07-09

4.  'Do I have the capacity to make capacity judgements?' Researcher reflections from a person-centred dementia support study.

Authors:  Sarah Griffiths; Alex Gude; Leanne Greene; Lauren Weston; Caroline L Sutcliffe; Hannah Wheat; Tomasina M Oh; Richard Byng
Journal:  Dementia (London)       Date:  2022-02-11

Review 5.  Allied health professionals: A promising ally in the work against health inequalities- A rapid review.

Authors:  A Gkiouleka; M R J Aquino; O Ojo-Aromokudu; K R van Daalen; I L Kuhn; E Turner-Moss; K Thomas; R Barnard; R Strudwick; J Ford
Journal:  Public Health Pract (Oxf)       Date:  2022-05-07

6.  Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Edward J D Webb; Yvonne Lynch; David Meads; Simon Judge; Nicola Randall; Juliet Goldbart; Stuart Meredith; Liz Moulam; Stephane Hess; Janice Murray
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Development of a new high sensitivity mechanical switch for augmentative and alternative communication access in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  M Caligari; M Godi; M Giardini; R Colombo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 4.262

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.