Bernhard Giesenhagen1, Nathalie Martin2, Phil Donkiewicz2, Željka Perić Kačarević3, Ralf Smeets4, Ole Jung4, Reinhard Schnettler5, Mike Barbeck4. 1. Private Practice, Kassel, Germany. 2. botiss biomaterials, Berlin, Germany. 3. Department of anatomy histology and embryology, Faculty of dental medicine and health, University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia. 4. Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Division for Regenerative Orofacial Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 5. Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this case report is to introduce a one-stage bone block augmentation with a cylindrical freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) and simultaneous implantation for the reconstruction of a single-tooth bone defect. CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The report describes this method on the basis of radiographical and clinical images derived from a single patient. CONCLUSIONS: The report demonstrates the time-saving and successful application of this treatment concept, which has the potential to increase patient satisfaction and comfort. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The application of the presented technique enabled a prosthetic rehabilitation of the extracted tooth about 3 months earlier as compared to the conventional procedure, while demonstrating no compromises regarding clinical outcome, functionality and esthetics.
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this case report is to introduce a one-stage bone block augmentation with a cylindrical freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) and simultaneous implantation for the reconstruction of a single-tooth bone defect. CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The report describes this method on the basis of radiographical and clinical images derived from a single patient. CONCLUSIONS: The report demonstrates the time-saving and successful application of this treatment concept, which has the potential to increase patient satisfaction and comfort. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The application of the presented technique enabled a prosthetic rehabilitation of the extracted tooth about 3 months earlier as compared to the conventional procedure, while demonstrating no compromises regarding clinical outcome, functionality and esthetics.
Authors: Carolin Lindner; Annica PrÖhl; Ole Jung; Mike Barbeck; Manuel Abels; Tom LÖffler; Milijana Batinic Journal: In Vivo Date: 2020 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.155