| Literature DB >> 30070065 |
Mitchell J George1,2, Karthik Prabhakara2, Naama E Toledano-Furman2, Yao-Wei Wang1, Brijesh S Gill1, Charles E Wade1, Scott D Olson2, Charles S Cox2.
Abstract
Clinical cellular therapeutics (CCTs) have shown preliminary efficacy in reducing inflammation after trauma, preserving cardiac function after myocardial infarction, and improving functional recovery after stroke. However, most clinically available cell lines express tissue factor (TF) which stimulates coagulation. We sought to define the degree of procoagulant activity of CCTs as related to TF expression. CCT samples from bone marrow, adipose, amniotic fluid, umbilical cord, multi-potent adult progenitor cell donors, and bone marrow mononuclear cells were tested. TF expression and phenotype were quantified using flow cytometry. Procoagulant activity of the CCTs was measured in vitro with thromboelastography and calibrated thrombogram. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) separated samples into high- and low-TF expressing populations to isolate the contribution of TF to coagulation. A TF neutralizing antibody was incubated with samples to demonstrate loss of procoagulant function. All CCTs tested expressed procoagulant activity that correlated with expression of tissue factor. Time to clot and thrombin formation decreased with increasing TF expression. High-TF expressing cells decreased clotting time more than low-TF expressing cells when isolated from a single donor using FACS. A TF neutralizing antibody restored clotting time to control values in some, but not all, CCT samples. CCTs demonstrate wide variability in procoagulant activity related to TF expression. Time to clot and thrombin formation decreases as TF load increases and this procoagulant effect is neutralized by a TF blocking antibody. Clinical trials using CCTs are in progress and TF expression may emerge as a safety release criterion. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2018;7:731-739.Entities:
Keywords: Clinical cellular therapeutics; Coagulation; Tissue factor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30070065 PMCID: PMC6186273 DOI: 10.1002/sctm.18-0015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med ISSN: 2157-6564 Impact factor: 6.940
Mesenchymal markers of AF MSC, ADP MSC, BM MSC, UMB MSC, and BM MNC
| 7AAD | CD105 | CD73 | CD34 | CD45 | CD90 | HLA DR | CD44 | CD29 | CD31 | CD142 | APN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AF MSC | 88 | ++ | +++ | − | − | +++ | − | +++ | +++ | − | +++ | 3 |
| ADP MSC | 99 | ++ | +++ | − | − | +++ | − | +++ | +++ | − | +++ | 1 |
| BM MSC | 86 | +++ | +++ | − | − | +++ | − | +++ | +++ | − | ++ | 3 |
| UMB MSC | 89 | ++ | +++ | − | − | +++ | − | +++ | +++ | − | ++ | 1 |
| BM MNC | 87 | − | − | − | − | + | − | +++ | ++ | ++ | + | 1 |
“+++” indicates the marker is highly expressed, “++” moderately expressed, “+” expressed and “−” indicates not detected. Abbreviation: APN, average passage number.
Figure 1TF load varies for each tissue source. TF load is the product of percent cells expressing TF and the mean fluorescent intensity of the sample measured by flow cytometry. Abbreviations: AF MSC, amniotic fluid mesenchymal stromal cell; ADP MSC, adipose mesenchymal stromal cell; BM MSC, bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cell; UMB MSC, umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cell; MAPC, multipotent adult progenitor cell. BM MNC, bone marrow mono‐nuclear cell.
Figure 2Panel represents Pearson correlation between TEG R time and TF load (A). R time is expressed as percent of control. (B): Box‐and‐whisker plots demonstrating percent of control R time after treatment with different CCTs.
Figure 3Pearson correlation between CAT lag time and TF load. Lag time is expressed as percent of control.
Figure 4TEG R time and CAT lag time correlate closely when varying CCT associated TF. Both metrics are expressed as percent of controls.
Figure 5The procoagulant effect of MSCs is variable when cells are sorted based on TF expression. High TF expressing populations will have a larger decrease in TEG R time than lower TF expressing populations compared with controls.
Figure 6The procoagulant effect of MSCs is reversible with a TF neutralizing MAb. (A): As concentration of the TF8‐5G9 MAb increases, the procoagulant effect of all MSCs decreases and eventually reaches a steady‐state. (B): The procoagulant effect of ADP and BM Derived MSC is reversed at 200 μg/ml of the MAb. The procoagulant effect of AF and BM MSC is only partially reversed.
Figure 7The procoagulant effect of MSCs is decreased when cell concentration is diluted. Logarithmic curves applied to each sample demonstrate excellent fit with R 2 > 0.96.