INTRODUCTION: Thalassemia major (TM) is an inherited disorder caused by ineffective erythropoiesis. At the present time, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a curative option. Conventional busulfan and cyclophosphamide based myeloablative conditioning regimens are limited by increased toxicity, especially in high-risk patients. Replacement of cyclophosphamide with fludarabine has reduced toxicity and nonrelapse mortality (NRM), thus improving outcomes. We analyzed long-term data of our fludarabine-based myeloablative, reduced toxicity protocol, specifically in high-risk patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 47 consecutive patients with TM undergoing allo-SCT from matched donors, using the fludarabine-based regimen (reduced toxicity regimen). The median age of the cohort was 10 years. Thirty-eight patients (80%) were in the high-risk and nine patients (20%) were in the low-risk category. The primary aim of this analysis was thalassemia-free survival (TFS). RESULTS: The rejection rate was 11% within high-risk patients with NRM of 2%. With a median follow-up period of 7 years (1-15 years), the 10-year TFS in the entire cohort was 87%, and the overall survival (OS) was 97%. The 10-year TFS and OS among the low-risk and high-risk groups were 90% versus 84%, respectively (P = 0.45) and 100% versus 96%, respectively (P = 0.5), and both subsets of patients did equally well. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, replacement of high-dose cyclophosphamide with fludarabine is well tolerated with minimal regimen-related toxicity and acceptable rejection rates, especially in high-risk patients.
INTRODUCTION:Thalassemia major (TM) is an inherited disorder caused by ineffective erythropoiesis. At the present time, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a curative option. Conventional busulfan and cyclophosphamide based myeloablative conditioning regimens are limited by increased toxicity, especially in high-risk patients. Replacement of cyclophosphamide with fludarabine has reduced toxicity and nonrelapse mortality (NRM), thus improving outcomes. We analyzed long-term data of our fludarabine-based myeloablative, reduced toxicity protocol, specifically in high-risk patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 47 consecutive patients with TM undergoing allo-SCT from matched donors, using the fludarabine-based regimen (reduced toxicity regimen). The median age of the cohort was 10 years. Thirty-eight patients (80%) were in the high-risk and nine patients (20%) were in the low-risk category. The primary aim of this analysis was thalassemia-free survival (TFS). RESULTS: The rejection rate was 11% within high-risk patients with NRM of 2%. With a median follow-up period of 7 years (1-15 years), the 10-year TFS in the entire cohort was 87%, and the overall survival (OS) was 97%. The 10-year TFS and OS among the low-risk and high-risk groups were 90% versus 84%, respectively (P = 0.45) and 100% versus 96%, respectively (P = 0.5), and both subsets of patients did equally well. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, replacement of high-dose cyclophosphamide with fludarabine is well tolerated with minimal regimen-related toxicity and acceptable rejection rates, especially in high-risk patients.