Literature DB >> 30069790

A Novel Open-Source Novel App Improves Anesthesia Operating Room Equipment Supply.

Clyde T Matava1,2, Joyce Magbitang3, Sunny Choi3, Sabrina Bhatia3, Michael Tan4,5.   

Abstract

Anesthesiologists are dependent on specialized drugs and equipment being immediately available for patient care. Deficiencies in supplies impact on operating room efficiency and patient safety. In our institution, we do not have anesthesia assistants/aides and depend on general aides to stock anesthesia related equipment which resulted in many shortages. We hypothesized that a mobile app would be useful for tracking and reporting and informing changes to stocking resulting in an improvement in the supply of anesthesia equipment. Following institutional quality improvement approval, we developed an app to collect metrics (which included the last 2 months of paper documentation - September and October 2015) and the first 12 months of the app usage (November 2015 to November 2016). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze data from the app. The primary outcome was the number of reports made over time. Secondary outcomes include the impact of missing items on operating room efficiency and patient safety, the most commonly reported missing items, and the most common actions taken following the discovery of missing items. The app increased the reporting by more than 300% (compared to paper) over the first 2 months. Over the year, 549 items were reported missing. The most common category of missing items was airway related 274 (49.9%). The single most commonly reported missing item was the Wisconsin Laryngoscope Size 1 Blade 95 (17.3%). App users reported the missing item safety impact as high 86 (15.7%) times and efficiency impact as high 117 (21.3%) times. Changes to staffing and supply resulted in a decrease in missing items reported. Our results demonstrate that an app can be useful for reporting, tracking of real-time shortages of anesthesia equipment and is easy to design and implement. Furthermore, the app has generated useful and robust data that has led to staffing changes and improvements in the anesthesia equipment supply chain. The app design and use may be useful in other clinical areas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia; Design; Equipment; Mobile applications; Patient safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30069790     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-018-1026-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  10 in total

1.  A user-centered model for designing consumer mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps).

Authors:  Rebecca Schnall; Marlene Rojas; Suzanne Bakken; William Brown; Alex Carballo-Dieguez; Monique Carry; Deborah Gelaude; Jocelyn Patterson Mosley; Jasmine Travers
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Interactive pediatric emergency checklists to the palm of your hand - How the Pedi Crisis App traveled around the world.

Authors:  Jorge A Gálvez; Justin L Lockman; Laura E Schleelein; Allan F Simpao; Luis M Ahumada; Bryan A Wolf; Maully J Shah; Eugenie Heitmiller; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.556

3.  A Smartphone-based Decision Support Tool Improves Test Performance Concerning Application of the Guidelines for Managing Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Therapy.

Authors:  Matthew D McEvoy; William R Hand; Marjorie P Stiegler; Amy N DiLorenzo; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Kenneth R Moran; Robert Lekowski; Mark E Nunnally; Erin L Manning; Yaping Shi; Matthew S Shotwell; Rajnish K Gupta; John M Corey; Randall M Schell
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  A comparison of electronic records to paper records in mental health centers.

Authors:  Jack Tsai; Gary Bond
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  A smartphone version of the Faces Pain Scale-Revised and the Color Analog Scale for postoperative pain assessment in children.

Authors:  Terri Sun; Nicholas West; J Mark Ansermino; Carolyne J Montgomery; Dorothy Myers; Dustin Dunsmuir; Gillian R Lauder; Carl L von Baeyer
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.556

6.  Comparing paper-based with electronic patient records: lessons learned during a study on diagnosis and procedure codes.

Authors:  Jurgen Stausberg; Dietrich Koch; Josef Ingenerf; Michael Betzler
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  A mobile and asynchronous electronic data capture system for epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Jens Meyer; Daniel Fredrich; Jens Piegsa; Mohamad Habes; Neeltje van den Berg; Wolfgang Hoffmann
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Comparison of electronic data capture (EDC) with the standard data capture method for clinical trial data.

Authors:  Brigitte Walther; Safayet Hossin; John Townend; Neil Abernethy; David Parker; David Jeffries
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Medical Registry Data Collection Efficiency: A Crossover Study Comparing Web-Based Electronic Data Capture and a Standard Spreadsheet.

Authors:  Pedro Vinícius Staziaki; Phillip Kim; Harshna V Vadvala; Brian B Ghoshhajra
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Mobile Apps for Teaching Intubation: Scoping Review and Critical Analysis in eLearning.

Authors:  Clyde Matava; Anne-Marie Leo; Fahad Alam
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2017-09-05
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Acceptance of mHealth among health professionals: a case study on anesthesia practitioners.

Authors:  Hugo Carvalho; Michael Verdonck; Patrice Forget; Jan Poelaert
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 2.217

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.