Literature DB >> 30069542

Spine surgery registries: hope for evidence-based spinal care?

Maryem Ismael1, Jorge Hugo Villafañe2, Federico Cabitza3, Giuseppe Banfi1,4, Pedro Berjano1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the perceptions of decision-makers in major orthopedic centers regarding the value, implementation and use of spine surgery registries. A 33-item survey was sent to CEOs and heads of spine surgery of the International Society of Orthopedic Centers (ISOC). ISOC includes 21 hospitals worldwide with a special focus on high-quality musculoskeletal care. Twelve out of 20 member centers (60%) replied to the survey. Seven have working registries; 5 in Europe and 2 in North America. The estimations for the cost/year were distributed more evenly: $10,000 [2], $20,000 [1], $50,000 [1]. Society cannot afford unnecessary surgery nor renounce to cure patients with effective treatments. Spine surgery registries provide high levels of evidence. The cost of implementing a registry is limited in comparison to RCTs. Spine registries can pragmatically fill our knowledge gap by turning every operated patient into a study participant.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Spine; management; observational; outcomes; prospective studies; registry; research

Year:  2018        PMID: 30069542      PMCID: PMC6046346          DOI: 10.21037/jss.2018.05.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  6 in total

Review 1.  Effect of methodological quality measures in spinal surgery research: a metaepidemiological study.

Authors:  Wilco C H Jacobs; Moyo C Kruyt; Ab J Verbout; F Cumhur Oner
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Prognosis of total hip replacement. A Swedish multicenter study of 4,664 revisions.

Authors:  L Ahnfelt; P Herberts; H Malchau; G B Andersson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1990

3.  Vertebroplasty: about sense and nonsense of uncontrolled "controlled randomized prospective trials".

Authors:  Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Mapping of Microbiological Procedures by the Members of the International Society of Orthopaedic Centers (ISOC) for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infections.

Authors:  Lorenzo Drago; Lars Lidgren; Elena Bottinelli; Jorge Hugo Villafañe; Pedro Berjano; Giuseppe Banfi; Carlo Luca Romanò; Thomas P Sculco
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Multicenter clinical trials and their value in assessing total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  P Herberts; L Ahnfelt; H Malchau; C Strömberg; G B Andersson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Evidence and practice in spine registries.

Authors:  Miranda L van Hooff; Wilco C H Jacobs; Paul C Willems; Michel W J M Wouters; Marinus de Kleuver; Wilco C Peul; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Peter Fritzell
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.717

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Translating Data Analytics Into Improved Spine Surgery Outcomes: A Roadmap for Biomedical Informatics Research in 2021.

Authors:  Jacob K Greenberg; Ayodamola Otun; Zoher Ghogawala; Po-Yin Yen; Camilo A Molina; David D Limbrick; Randi E Foraker; Michael P Kelly; Wilson Z Ray
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-05-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.