Literature DB >> 30069541

The evolution of partial undercutting facetectomy in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Derek T Cawley1, Ravi Shenoy1, Adam Benton1, Senthil Muthian1, Susanne Selvadurai1, John R Johnson1, Sean Molloy1.   

Abstract

Decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis is the most common spinal surgery in those over 60 years of age. While this procedure has shown immediate and durable benefits, improvements in outcome have not changed significantly. Technical aspects of surgical decompression have evolved significantly. The recently introduced ultrasonic bone cutter allows a precise and safe peri-neural bone resection. The principles of preservation of stability, as described by Getty et al. have remained as relevant as when these were described 40 years ago.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decompression; facetectomy; lumbar; spinal stenosis; ultra-sonic bone cutter

Year:  2018        PMID: 30069541      PMCID: PMC6046331          DOI: 10.21037/jss.2018.06.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  15 in total

1.  Complications associated with minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Vinod K Podichetty; John Spears; Robert E Isaacs; John Booher; Robert S Biscup
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2006-05

2.  Occult lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  A R Choudhury; J C Taylor
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Spinal stenosis, a cause of cauda equina compression.

Authors:  J Schatzker; G F Pennal
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1968-08

4.  Lumbar nerve root compression at the intervertebral foramina caused by arthritis of the posterior facets.

Authors:  J A Epstein; B S Epstein; L S Lavine; R Carras; A D Rosenthal; P Sumner
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 5.  Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression.

Authors:  Karsten Schöller; Marjan Alimi; Guang-Ting Cong; Paul Christos; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Computerised tomography in lumbar stenosis. A preliminary report.

Authors:  F Postacchini; G Pezzeri; A Montanaro; G Natali
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1980-02

7.  Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Kota Watanabe; Morio Matsumoto; Takeshi Ikegami; Yuji Nishiwaki; Takashi Tsuji; Ken Ishii; Yuto Ogawa; Hironari Takaishi; Masaya Nakamura; Yoshiaki Toyama; Kazuhiro Chiba
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-12-10

8.  Long-term results of partial undercutting facetectomy for lumbar lateral recess stenosis.

Authors:  P L Sanderson; C J Getty
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Safe and minimally invasive laminoplastic laminotomy using an ultrasonic bone curette for spinal surgery: technical note.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Ito; Shigetoshi Ishizaka; Tetsuo Sasaki; Takahiro Miyahara; Tetsuyoshi Horiuchi; Keiichi Sakai; Hiroaki Shigeta; Kazuhiro Hongo
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2009-03-27

10.  Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) before and one year after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  K-A Jansson; G Németh; F Granath; B Jönsson; P Blomqvist
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.