Robert S Lee1, Juliet Batke2, Lorna Weir3, Nicolas Dea4, Charles G Fisher4. 1. Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, Middlesex HA7 4LP, UK. 2. Regional Surgical Program, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 3. British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 4. Division of Spine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, and the Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program at Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Combined surgery and radiotherapy, in the treatment of metastatic disease of the spine, is now emerging as the gold standard of care where there is an indication for spinal stabilization and/or surgical decompression. However potential complications related to wound healing can occur with radiation delivered shortly before or after to surgery. The purpose of this study was to understand the practice of leading radiation oncologists and spine surgeons with regards to the timing of radiation (conventional and stereotactic) and surgery for the management of spinal metastases. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to leading radiation oncologists and spine surgeons throughout North America and completed via mail, email or internet. RESULTS: Eighty-six responses were received from radiation oncologists and 27 from spine surgeons. A total of 58% recommended waiting either 1 or 2 weeks after radiotherapy before operating on patients with spinal metastases. With radiotherapy administered after surgery, 62% of respondents suggested either a 1 or 2 weeks interval was sufficient. CONCLUSIONS: There appeared to be no significant difference in practice with the use of stereotactic radiotherapy though surgeons tend to accept a shorter interval in this subset of patients. We recommend that the interval between radiotherapy and surgery (and vice versa) should ideally be a minimum of 2 weeks.
BACKGROUND: Combined surgery and radiotherapy, in the treatment of metastatic disease of the spine, is now emerging as the gold standard of care where there is an indication for spinal stabilization and/or surgical decompression. However potential complications related to wound healing can occur with radiation delivered shortly before or after to surgery. The purpose of this study was to understand the practice of leading radiation oncologists and spine surgeons with regards to the timing of radiation (conventional and stereotactic) and surgery for the management of spinal metastases. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to leading radiation oncologists and spine surgeons throughout North America and completed via mail, email or internet. RESULTS: Eighty-six responses were received from radiation oncologists and 27 from spine surgeons. A total of 58% recommended waiting either 1 or 2 weeks after radiotherapy before operating on patients with spinal metastases. With radiotherapy administered after surgery, 62% of respondents suggested either a 1 or 2 weeks interval was sufficient. CONCLUSIONS: There appeared to be no significant difference in practice with the use of stereotactic radiotherapy though surgeons tend to accept a shorter interval in this subset of patients. We recommend that the interval between radiotherapy and surgery (and vice versa) should ideally be a minimum of 2 weeks.
Authors: Kenneth C Thomas; Bohdan Nosyk; Charles G Fisher; Marcel Dvorak; Roy A Patchell; William F Regine; Andrew Loblaw; Nick Bansback; Daphne Guh; Huiying Sun; Aslam Anis Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Ran Harel; Samuel Chao; Ajit Krishnaney; Todd Emch; Edward C Benzel; Lilyana Angelov Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Julio C Furlan; Kelvin K-W Chan; Guillermo A Sandoval; Kenneth C K Lam; Christopher A Klinger; Roy A Patchell; Audrey Laporte; Michael G Fehlings Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2012-04-14 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Charles G Fisher; Christian P DiPaola; Timothy C Ryken; Mark H Bilsky; Christopher I Shaffrey; Sigurd H Berven; James S Harrop; Michael G Fehlings; Stefano Boriani; Dean Chou; Meic H Schmidt; David W Polly; Roberto Biagini; Shane Burch; Mark B Dekutoski; Aruna Ganju; Peter C Gerszten; Ziya L Gokaslan; Michael W Groff; Norbert J Liebsch; Ehud Mendel; Scott H Okuno; Shreyaskumar Patel; Laurence D Rhines; Peter S Rose; Daniel M Sciubba; Narayan Sundaresan; Katsuro Tomita; Peter P Varga; Luiz R Vialle; Frank D Vrionis; Yoshiya Yamada; Daryl R Fourney Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Alexis Falicov; Charles G Fisher; Joe Sparkes; Michael C Boyd; Peter C Wing; Marcel F Dvorak Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Wyatt G Payne; Deepak K Naidu; Chad K Wheeler; David Barkoe; Marni Mentis; R Emerick Salas; David J Smith; Martin C Robson Journal: Eplasty Date: 2008-01-11
Authors: David Eugenio Hinojosa-Gonzalez; Andres Roblesgil-Medrano; Juan Bernardo Villarreal-Espinosa; Eduardo Tellez-Garcia; Luis Carlos Bueno-Gutierrez; Jose Ramon Rodriguez-Barreda; Eduardo Flores-Villalba; Hector R Martinez; Mario Benvenutti-Regato; Jose Antonio Figueroa-Sanchez Journal: Asian Spine J Date: 2021-09-01
Authors: Tej D Azad; Kunal Varshneya; Daniel B Herrick; Arjun V Pendharkar; Allen L Ho; Martin Stienen; Corinna Zygourakis; Hilary P Bagshaw; Anand Veeravagu; John K Ratliff; Atman Desai Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2019-11-22