BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment modalities for patients with stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are still a matter of debate. To provide best outcome and to avoid unnecessary treatment patient selection for surgical therapy is crucial. In addition to mediastinal downstaging the lymph node ratio (LNR) has been suggested as a prognosticator in this patient group. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and histopathologic data of 78 patients with stage IIIA N2 NSCLC, who underwent induction therapy with two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy for intended surgery at our clinic between 2009 and 2016. To evaluate the prognostic value of the LNR the cut off was set at 0.33 as reported in prior literature. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 30.1 months. In multivariate analysis mediastinal down staging was associated with a longer overall survival (OS): 52.2 (range, 5.9-89.7) months for ypN0 versus 24.6 (4.4-84.2) months for ypN1/2 (HR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.07-7.1, P=0.0348). LNR ≤0.33 was linked to a better OS of 39.3 (range, 5.9-89.7) months compared to 14.7 (range, 4.4-66.2) months for a LNR >0.33 in univariate analysis (P=0.037). In multivariate analysis a statistical trend could be observed (HR, 2.82; 95% CI, 0.98-8.14, P=0.1). In patients with persistent lymph node involvement the LNR could also identify a subgroup of patients with a favorable prognosis (30.1 vs. 14.7 months, P=0.145). CONCLUSIONS: Mediastinal downstaging remains the best prognosticator in stage IIIA N2 NSCLC after induction therapy. However, using the LNR in patients with persistent mediastinal lymph node metastasis a subgroup with a favorable prognosis could be identified. The LNR could aid in finding the best treatment modalities for these patients.
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment modalities for patients with stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are still a matter of debate. To provide best outcome and to avoid unnecessary treatment patient selection for surgical therapy is crucial. In addition to mediastinal downstaging the lymph node ratio (LNR) has been suggested as a prognosticator in this patient group. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and histopathologic data of 78 patients with stage IIIA N2 NSCLC, who underwent induction therapy with two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy for intended surgery at our clinic between 2009 and 2016. To evaluate the prognostic value of the LNR the cut off was set at 0.33 as reported in prior literature. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 30.1 months. In multivariate analysis mediastinal down staging was associated with a longer overall survival (OS): 52.2 (range, 5.9-89.7) months for ypN0 versus 24.6 (4.4-84.2) months for ypN1/2 (HR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.07-7.1, P=0.0348). LNR ≤0.33 was linked to a better OS of 39.3 (range, 5.9-89.7) months compared to 14.7 (range, 4.4-66.2) months for a LNR >0.33 in univariate analysis (P=0.037). In multivariate analysis a statistical trend could be observed (HR, 2.82; 95% CI, 0.98-8.14, P=0.1). In patients with persistent lymph node involvement the LNR could also identify a subgroup of patients with a favorable prognosis (30.1 vs. 14.7 months, P=0.145). CONCLUSIONS: Mediastinal downstaging remains the best prognosticator in stage IIIA N2 NSCLC after induction therapy. However, using the LNR in patients with persistent mediastinal lymph node metastasis a subgroup with a favorable prognosis could be identified. The LNR could aid in finding the best treatment modalities for these patients.
Authors: David S Ettinger; Douglas E Wood; Dara L Aisner; Wallace Akerley; Jessica Bauman; Lucian R Chirieac; Thomas A D'Amico; Malcolm M DeCamp; Thomas J Dilling; Michael Dobelbower; Robert C Doebele; Ramaswamy Govindan; Matthew A Gubens; Mark Hennon; Leora Horn; Ritsuko Komaki; Rudy P Lackner; Michael Lanuti; Ticiana A Leal; Leah J Leisch; Rogerio Lilenbaum; Jules Lin; Billy W Loo; Renato Martins; Gregory A Otterson; Karen Reckamp; Gregory J Riely; Steven E Schild; Theresa A Shapiro; James Stevenson; Scott J Swanson; Kurt Tauer; Stephen C Yang; Kristina Gregory; Miranda Hughes Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Chukwumere E Nwogu; Adrienne Groman; Daniel Fahey; Sai Yendamuri; Elisabeth Dexter; Todd L Demmy; Austin Miller; Mary Reid Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2012-03-20 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Lindsey A Torre; Freddie Bray; Rebecca L Siegel; Jacques Ferlay; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Gerard A Silvestri; Michael K Gould; Mitchell L Margolis; Lynn T Tanoue; Douglas McCrory; Eric Toloza; Frank Detterbeck Journal: Chest Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Herbert Decaluwé; Paul De Leyn; Johan Vansteenkiste; Christophe Dooms; Dirk Van Raemdonck; Philippe Nafteux; Willy Coosemans; Toni Lerut Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2009-06-06 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Wilfried Ernst Erich Eberhardt; Christoph Pöttgen; Thomas Christoph Gauler; Godehard Friedel; Stefanie Veit; Vanessa Heinrich; Stefan Welter; Wilfried Budach; Werner Spengler; Martin Kimmich; Berthold Fischer; Heinz Schmidberger; Dirk De Ruysscher; Claus Belka; Sebastian Cordes; Rodrigo Hepp; Diana Lütke-Brintrup; Nils Lehmann; Martin Schuler; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Georgios Stamatis; Martin Stuschke Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: K S Albain; V W Rusch; J J Crowley; T W Rice; A T Turrisi; J K Weick; V A Lonchyna; C A Presant; R J McKenna; D R Gandara Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1995-08 Impact factor: 44.544