Literature DB >> 30068855

Clinical Outcomes of Repeat Aortic Valve Replacement for Subaortic Pannus in Mechanical Aortic Valve.

Pyo Won Park1, Byungjoon Park1, Dong Seop Jeong1, Kiick Sung1, Wook Sung Kim1, Young Tak Lee1, Seung Woo Park2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the early and late clinical outcomes after repeat aortic valve replacement (AVR) for subaortic pannus in patients with mechanical valves. Methods and 
Results: Between 2001 and 2017, 51 patients (median age, 59 years; 42 women) with prosthetic aortic stenosis (AS) caused by pannus ingrowth underwent repeat AVR because of acute malfunction of monoleaflet valve (3 patients), severe prosthetic AS (30 patients), and moderate prosthetic AS at the time of tricuspid or mitral valve surgery (18 patients). The median follow-up duration was 100 (interquartile range, 64-138) months. Double valve replacement was performed in 45 (88%) patients. Median time interval from previous operation was 161 (interquartile range, 121-194) months. The explanted mechanical AV was monoleaflet and bileaflet in 16 (31%) and 34 (67%) patients, respectively. Concomitant procedures included 16 mitral valve replacements (14 repeat) and 36 tricuspid valve surgeries (15 replacements, 21 repairs). No hospital deaths or cases of heart block occurred. Overall survival and event-free survival rates at 10 years were 88% and 51%, respectively. Late complications included recurrent prosthetic AS (4 patients), new paravalvular leakage of the mitral valve (5 patients), and severe tricuspid regurgitation (2 patients).
CONCLUSIONS: Although repeat AVR for subaortic pannus had acceptable early and late survival, recurrent prosthetic AS was frequently observed during late follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve; Pannus; Prosthesis; Reoperation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30068855     DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  3 in total

1.  Early clinical outcomes of simple pannus removal for mechanical aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Huimin Cui; Lin Zhang; Shixiong Wei; Shengli Jiang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 1.637

2.  Clinical and Surgical Evaluations of Reoperation After Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement Due to Different Etiologies.

Authors:  Jiehui Li; Shuiyun Wang; Hansong Sun; Jianping Xu; Chao Dong; Min Song; Qibin Yu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-17

3.  Reappraisal of mechanical tricuspid valve replacement in the current era: a single center retrospective study.

Authors:  Byungjoon Park; Dong Seop Jeong; Wook Sung Kim; Kiick Sung; Pyo Won Park
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.895

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.