Literature DB >> 30068793

Outcomes of Self-Expanding vs. Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valves for the Treatment of Degenerated Aortic Surgical Bioprostheses - A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison.

Tomoki Ochiai1, Sung-Han Yoon1, Rahul Sharma1, Masaki Miyasaka1, Takahiro Nomura1, Tanya Rami1, Yoshio Maeno1, Tarun Chakravarty1, Mamoo Nakamura1, Wen Cheng1, Raj Makkar1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve (VIV) replacement within failed bioprosthetic surgical aortic valves is a feasible therapeutic option. However, data comparing the hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of VIV replacement with supra-annular self-expanding and balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (THV) are limited. Methods and 
Results: Outcomes of 40 and 95 patients treated with supra-annular self-expanding and balloon-expandable THV, respectively, were compared after propensity score matching, which yielded 37 pairs of patients with similar baseline characteristics. Hemodynamic and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Postprocedural mean gradient was significantly lower in the self-expanding THV group than in the balloon-expandable THV group (12.1±6.1 mmHg vs. 19.0±7.3 mmHg, P<0.001). The incidence of at least mild postprocedural aortic regurgitation (AR) was comparable between the self-expanding and balloon-expandable THV groups (21.6% vs. 10.8%, P=0.39). In the self-expanding THV group, the new-generation THV showed a trend towards a lower incidence of at least mild AR compared with the early-generation THV (12.5% vs. 38.5%, P=0.07). A similar trend was observed in the balloon-expandable THV group (4.2% vs. 23.1%, P=0.08). There was no significant difference between the self-expanding and balloon-expandable THV groups in the cumulative 2-year all-cause mortality rates (22.4% vs. 43.4%, log-rank P=0.26).
CONCLUSIONS: The supra-annular self-expanding THV was associated with a lower postprocedural mean gradient compared with balloon-expandable THV in patients undergoing aortic VIV replacement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Degenerative valve; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement; Valve restenosis; Valve-in-valve

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30068793     DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  4 in total

Review 1.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Degenerated Surgical Aortic Bioprosthesis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Abdallah El Sabbagh; Mohammed Al-Hijji; Mayra Guerrero
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2022-05-16

2.  Balloon-expandable versus self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bioprosthetic dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-An Lee; An-Hsun Chou; Victor Chien-Chia Wu; Dong-Yi Chen; Hsin-Fu Lee; Kuang-Tso Lee; Pao-Hsien Chu; Yu-Ting Cheng; Shang-Hung Chang; Shao-Wei Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Allegra Transcatheter Heart Valve inside a Degenerated Sutureless Aortic Bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Maximilian Vondran; Bernd Abt; Holger Nef; Ardawan J Rastan
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Rep       Date:  2021-01-19

4.  Relationship between Invasive and Echocardiographic Transvalvular Gradients after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Seyed Hossein Aalaei-Andabili; Ki E Park; Calvin Y Choi; Eddie W Manning; Wade W Stinson; Ryan Van Woerkom; Thomas Pilgrim; Dharam J Kumbhani; Anthony A Bavry
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2020-01-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.