Literature DB >> 30068514

'Van Herick Plus': a modified grading scheme for the assessment of peripheral anterior chamber depth and angle.

Ramanjit Sihota1, Neha Kamble2, Ajay K Sharma1, Anju Bhari1, Amisha Gupta1, Neha Midha1, Harathy Selvan1, Tanuj Dada1, Viney Gupta1, Ravindra M Pandey3.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of a new, modified grading scheme involving a short vertical slit beam, at the inferior angle for peripheral anterior chamber depth (PAC) and angle estimation and its correlation with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT).
METHODS: A cross-sectional study of consecutive phakic patients, above 40 years of age, was performed. Using a short, vertical slit beam not reaching the pupil, the inferior angle at the sclerolimbal junction was evaluated, photographed and assessed by a ratio of peripheral anterior chamber depth to peripheral corneal thickness (PAC:PCT) and iridocorneal angle (ICA) on ImageJ software. The inferior angle at the same meridian was also recorded on ASOCT.
RESULTS: Based on the PAC:PCT ratio, the subjects were divided into four groups: I (<1/4), II (1/4-1/2), III (>1/2-1) and IV (>1). The clinically assessed angle by short vertical slit beam correlated well with ASOCT values, trabecular-iris angle (TIA) (r=0.918; p<0.001) and scleral spur angle (r=0.903, p<0.001). The mean difference between ICA and TIA on ASOCT was 0.7970; 95% limits of agreement:-5.7670 to 7.3610 (±1.96 SD). For angles graded narrow on ASOCT (TIA <200), using a cut-off of peripheral PAC:PCT <1/4, the area under the curve was 0.918 with a sensitivity of 85.2% and a specificity of 88.2%. There was good agreement between ImageJ parameters with those assessed subjectively on photograph of the slit beam examination by a glaucoma fellow (weighted kappa=0.74) as compared with a general ophthalmologist, where there was moderate agreement (weighted kappa=0.57).
CONCLUSION: A short, vertical slit lamp beam evaluation at the inferior angle is an easy and relatively accurate method for both peripheral anterior chamber depth and angle assessment. It correlated well with ASOCT and can be used as a more reliable screening tool to identify eyes with possibly occludable angles. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angle; diagnostic tests/investigation; glaucoma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30068514     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  3 in total

1.  Non-contact tests for identifying people at risk of primary angle closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Anish Jindal; Irene Ctori; Gianni Virgili; Ersilia Lucenteforte; John G Lawrenson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-28

Review 2.  Clinically useful smartphone ophthalmic imaging techniques.

Authors:  Amar Pujari; Gunjan Saluja; Divya Agarwal; Harathy Selvan; Namrata Sharma
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Anterior Chamber Angle Assessment Techniques: A Review.

Authors:  Ivano Riva; Eleonora Micheletti; Francesco Oddone; Carlo Bruttini; Silvia Montescani; Giovanni De Angelis; Luigi Rovati; Robert N Weinreb; Luciano Quaranta
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.