Literature DB >> 30067954

Docking techniques in pharmacology: How much promising?

Meenakshi Gupta1, Ruchika Sharma2, Anoop Kumar3.   

Abstract

In the drug development process, large numbers of molecules are failing at a later stage due to safety ö efficacy concerns which are generally investigated by conducting various experiments on animals but unfortunately, animal experimentation is associated with lots of limitations. Thus, there is an increasing interest in the development of alternative approaches that requires less number of animals. Docking is an alternative approach for screening of compounds before actually testing it on animals. It is the best option to predict the energetically favourable binding conformations of ligands in the active site cavity of particular receptor and has gained popularity in the scientific community to save time and money involved in the drug development process. The use of such techniques is increasing day by day among researchers due to availability of user friendly software's. Due to this, the number of papers related to docking has dramatically increased over the past decades. A variety of docking software's are currently available to predict the ligand binding pose in its particular receptor, but there is a lack of knowledge and confidence among scientists regarding accuracy of these softwares. There are many concerns to be taken care of, while carrying out any docking study such as selection of correct binding sites of the target protein, the selection of correct docking pose, lack of clarity over whether the compound is an antagonist or agonist, difficult to get best matching algorithms and scoring schemes. Many compounds show high dock score, but unfortunately fail in pre-clinical studies. These issues ought a chance to because for caution and concern before carrying out docking. Therefore, to ensure correct and effective application of docking techniques, it is necessary to understand the method's merits, demerits, the scope of application, and interpretation. In this review, we summarize fundamental concepts, why these techniques are needed, various docking methods and recent developments in this area. Further, current challenges and future perspectives of these tools are also discussed.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Docking study; Molecular dynamics; Pharmacology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30067954     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2018.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Chem        ISSN: 1476-9271            Impact factor:   2.877


  20 in total

1.  Effects of datumetine on hippocampal NMDAR activity.

Authors:  Azeez Olakunle Ishola; Aminu Imam; Moyosore Salihu Ajao
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2021-05-24

Review 2.  From Traditional Ethnopharmacology to Modern Natural Drug Discovery: A Methodology Discussion and Specific Examples.

Authors:  Stergios Pirintsos; Athanasios Panagiotopoulos; Michalis Bariotakis; Vangelis Daskalakis; Christos Lionis; George Sourvinos; Ioannis Karakasiliotis; Marilena Kampa; Elias Castanas
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.927

3.  Using parallelized incremental meta-docking can solve the conformational sampling issue when docking large ligands to proteins.

Authors:  Didier Devaurs; Dinler A Antunes; Sarah Hall-Swan; Nicole Mitchell; Mark Moll; Gregory Lizée; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  BMC Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2019-09-05

4.  Identification of evolutionarily stable functional and immunogenic sites across the SARS-CoV-2 proteome and greater coronavirus family.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Daniel M Konecki; David C Marciano; Harikumar Govindarajan; Amanda M Williams; Brigitta Wastuwidyaningtyas; Thomas Bourquard; Panagiotis Katsonis; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 6.931

5.  Theoretical calculations of molecular descriptors for anticancer activities of 1, 2, 3-triazole-pyrimidine derivatives against gastric cancer cell line (MGC-803): DFT, QSAR and docking approaches.

Authors:  Rhoda Oyeladun Oyewole; Abel Kolawole Oyebamiji; Banjo Semire
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-05-21

Review 6.  How 'Protein-Docking' Translates into the New Emerging Field of Docking Small Molecules to Nucleic Acids?

Authors:  Francesca Tessaro; Leonardo Scapozza
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  An In Silico Study of the Antioxidant Ability for Two Caffeine Analogs Using Molecular Docking and Quantum Chemical Methods.

Authors:  Josivan da Silva Costa; Ryan da Silva Ramos; Karina da Silva Lopes Costa; Davi do Socorro Barros Brasil; Carlos Henrique Tomich de Paula da Silva; Elenilze Figueiredo Batista Ferreira; Rosivaldo Dos Santos Borges; Joaquín María Campos; Williams Jorge da Cruz Macêdo; Cleydson Breno Rodrigues Dos Santos
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Lapatinib, Nilotinib and Lomitapide Inhibit Haemozoin Formation in Malaria Parasites.

Authors:  Ana Carolina C de Sousa; Keletso Maepa; Jill M Combrinck; Timothy J Egan
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  Virtual screening for potential inhibitors of β(1,3)-D-glucan synthase as drug candidates against fungal cell wall.

Authors:  Zinat Farhadi; Tayebeh Farhadi; Seyed MohammadReza Hashemian
Journal:  J Drug Assess       Date:  2020-03-11

10.  Virtual screening as a tool to discover new β-haematin inhibitors with activity against malaria parasites.

Authors:  Ana Carolina C de Sousa; Jill M Combrinck; Keletso Maepa; Timothy J Egan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.