AIMS: The immunoregulatory enzyme indoleamine dioxygenase 2,3 (IDO) has been implicated in cervical and vulvar squamous carcinomas (SCC) and may represent a mechanism of resistance to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy. However, the relationship between IDO and PD-L1 has not been well-investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-five cases of cervical and vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia and SCC were assessed for IDO and PD-L1 expression. Overall, tumoral PD-L1 expression was seen in 72% of SCC, while 50% expressed IDO; co-expression was seen in 42%. Using the combined positive score (CPS) threshold of 1 to account for both tumoral and immune staining, 83% of SCC expressed PD-L1, 61% expressed IDO and 53% showed co-expression. Cervical SCCs were significantly more likely than human papillomavirus (HPV)-related vulvar SCCs to express tumoral IDO (75% versus 13%, P < 0.001) and demonstrate an IDO CPS ≥ 1 (88% versus 25%, P < 0.001); no significant differences were seen for PD-L1. Additionally, there were no significant differences in IDO and PD-L1 expression in dVIN-associated versus HPV-associated vulvar SCC. In contrast to SCC, the majority of intraepithelial lesions were entirely negative for tumoral PD-L1 and IDO and had a CPS score of <1. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, IDO and PD-L1 co-expression is common in cervical SCCs and, to a lesser extent, vulvar SCCs. These data suggest a role for combination immunotherapy in a subset of cervical SCCs as well as select vulvar SCCs. Expression for both markers is less common in intraepithelial lesions, providing no strong support for this form of immunotherapy in the absence of invasion.
AIMS: The immunoregulatory enzyme indoleamine dioxygenase 2,3 (IDO) has been implicated in cervical and vulvar squamous carcinomas (SCC) and may represent a mechanism of resistance to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy. However, the relationship between IDO and PD-L1 has not been well-investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-five cases of cervical and vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia and SCC were assessed for IDO and PD-L1 expression. Overall, tumoral PD-L1 expression was seen in 72% of SCC, while 50% expressed IDO; co-expression was seen in 42%. Using the combined positive score (CPS) threshold of 1 to account for both tumoral and immune staining, 83% of SCC expressed PD-L1, 61% expressed IDO and 53% showed co-expression. Cervical SCCs were significantly more likely than human papillomavirus (HPV)-related vulvar SCCs to express tumoral IDO (75% versus 13%, P < 0.001) and demonstrate an IDOCPS ≥ 1 (88% versus 25%, P < 0.001); no significant differences were seen for PD-L1. Additionally, there were no significant differences in IDO and PD-L1 expression in dVIN-associated versus HPV-associated vulvar SCC. In contrast to SCC, the majority of intraepithelial lesions were entirely negative for tumoral PD-L1 and IDO and had a CPS score of <1. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, IDO and PD-L1 co-expression is common in cervical SCCs and, to a lesser extent, vulvar SCCs. These data suggest a role for combination immunotherapy in a subset of cervical SCCs as well as select vulvar SCCs. Expression for both markers is less common in intraepithelial lesions, providing no strong support for this form of immunotherapy in the absence of invasion.
Authors: Simona Maria Fragomeni; Frediano Inzani; Anna Fagotti; Luigi Della Corte; Stefano Gentileschi; Luca Tagliaferri; Gian Franco Zannoni; Giovanni Scambia; Giorgia Garganese Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2020-04-25 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Kevin T Lynch; Sarah E Gradecki; Minyoung Kwak; Max O Meneveau; Nolan A Wages; Alejandro A Gru; Craig L Slingluff Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 6.298