Literature DB >> 30067607

Deep Learning in Diagnosis of Maxillary Sinusitis Using Conventional Radiography.

Youngjune Kim1, Kyong Joon Lee1, Leonard Sunwoo1, Dongjun Choi1, Chang-Mo Nam1, Jungheum Cho1, Jihyun Kim2, Yun Jung Bae1, Roh-Eul Yoo3, Byung Se Choi1, Cheolkyu Jung1, Jae Hyoung Kim1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of a deep learning algorithm with that of radiologists in diagnosing maxillary sinusitis on Waters' view radiographs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 80,475 Waters' view radiographs, examined between May 2003 and February 2017, 9000 randomly selected cases were classified as normal or maxillary sinusitis based on radiographic findings and divided into training (n = 8000) and validation (n = 1000) sets to develop a deep learning algorithm. Two test sets composed of Waters' view radiographs with concurrent paranasal sinus computed tomography were labeled based on computed tomography findings: one with temporal separation (n = 140) and the other with geographic separation (n = 200) from the training set. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of the algorithm and 5 radiologists were assessed. Interobserver agreement between the algorithm and majority decision of the radiologists was measured. The correlation coefficient between the predicted probability of the algorithm and average confidence level of the radiologists was determined.
RESULTS: The AUCs of the deep learning algorithm were 0.93 and 0.88 for the temporal and geographic external test sets, respectively. The AUCs of the radiologists were 0.83 to 0.89 for the temporal and 0.75 to 0.84 for the geographic external test sets. The deep learning algorithm showed statistically significantly higher AUC than radiologist in both test sets. In terms of sensitivity and specificity, the deep learning algorithm was comparable to the radiologists. A strong interobserver agreement was noted between the algorithm and radiologists (Cohen κ coefficient, 0.82). The correlation coefficient between the predicted probability of the algorithm and confidence level of radiologists was 0.89 and 0.84 for the 2 test sets, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The deep learning algorithm could diagnose maxillary sinusitis on Waters' view radiograph with superior AUC and comparable sensitivity and specificity to those of radiologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30067607     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  22 in total

Review 1.  Technical and clinical overview of deep learning in radiology.

Authors:  Daiju Ueda; Akitoshi Shimazaki; Yukio Miki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Transfer learning in diagnosis of maxillary sinusitis using panoramic radiography and conventional radiography.

Authors:  Shinya Kotaki; Takahito Nishiguchi; Marino Araragi; Hironori Akiyama; Motoki Fukuda; Eiichiro Ariji; Yoshiko Ariji
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 1.882

3.  External Validation of Deep Learning Algorithms for Radiologic Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alice C Yu; Bahram Mohajer; John Eng
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-05-04

4.  Performance of deep learning models constructed using panoramic radiographs from two hospitals to diagnose fractures of the mandibular condyle.

Authors:  Masako Nishiyama; Kenichiro Ishibashi; Yoshiko Ariji; Motoki Fukuda; Wataru Nishiyama; Masahiro Umemura; Akitoshi Katsumata; Hiroshi Fujita; Eiichiro Ariji
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Evaluation of maxillary sinusitis from panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomographic images using a convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Gozde Serindere; Ersen Bilgili; Cagri Yesil; Neslihan Ozveren
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2022-03-15

6.  Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Oroantral Communication after Tooth Extraction Utilizing Preoperative Panoramic Radiography.

Authors:  Andreas Vollmer; Babak Saravi; Michael Vollmer; Gernot Michael Lang; Anton Straub; Roman C Brands; Alexander Kübler; Sebastian Gubik; Stefan Hartmann
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-06

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in rhinology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Antonio Mario Bulfamante; Francesco Ferella; Austin Michael Miller; Cecilia Rosso; Carlotta Pipolo; Emanuela Fuccillo; Giovanni Felisati; Alberto Maria Saibene
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.236

8.  Improvement diagnostic accuracy of sinusitis recognition in paranasal sinus X-ray using multiple deep learning models.

Authors:  Hyug-Gi Kim; Kyung Mi Lee; Eui Jong Kim; Jin San Lee
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-06

9.  Current applications and development of artificial intelligence for digital dental radiography.

Authors:  Ramadhan Hardani Putra; Chiaki Doi; Nobuhiro Yoda; Eha Renwi Astuti; Keiichi Sasaki
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 10.  Clinical applications and performance of intelligent systems in dental and maxillofacial radiology: A review.

Authors:  Ravleen Nagi; Konidena Aravinda; N Rakesh; Rajesh Gupta; Ajay Pal; Amrit Kaur Mann
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2020-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.