Literature DB >> 30067547

Prognostic factors for first-line therapy and overall survival of metastatic uveal melanoma: The Princess Margaret Cancer Centre experience.

Mathew N Nicholas1,2, Leila Khoja3, Eshetu G Atenafu4, David Hogg2, Ian Quirt2, Marcus Butler2, Anthony M Joshua2,5,6.   

Abstract

Metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) has a poor prognosis, with no established standard of care. Delineation of prognostic factors in MUM patients may enable stratified treatment algorithms of stage-specific survival. Overall, 132 MUM patients who presented to a single tertiary institution in Toronto, Canada, over 12 years were identified and data (demographics, clinical status, radiographic images, and laboratory values) were extracted. Associations with systemic first-line treatment outcome 12 weeks after first-line treatment, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) were explored by univariate and multivariable analysis. Age, presence of liver metastases, and time from primary presentation to metastatic presentation were significant variables affecting first-line treatment outcomes. Age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, presence of liver metastases, liver metastasis size, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, absolute neutrophil count, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase, time from primary presentation to metastatic presentation, and patients receiving surgery as the first-line treatment were significant variables affecting TTP. Age, ECOG score, presence of liver metastases, liver metastasis size, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, absolute neutrophil count, LDH, and alkaline phosphatase were significant variables affecting OS. Patients who underwent surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, liver-directed therapy, or targeted therapy had better OS compared with patients not receiving treatment with surgery, associated with a significantly better OS compared with all other therapies. Multivariable analysis showed increased age, absence of liver metastases, and absence of bone metastases to be associated with positive treatment outcomes. ECOG score of at least 1, increased LDH, and decreased time from primary to metastatic presentation would predict decreased TTP. Increased LDH, older age, and ECOG score of at least 1 were associated with decreased OS. These results identified prognostic markers and models thereof of treatment benefit and survival. Further validation in larger cohorts is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30067547     DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Melanoma Res        ISSN: 0960-8931            Impact factor:   3.599


  7 in total

1.  Five Decades of Enucleations for Uveal Melanoma in One Center: More Tumors with High Risk Factors, No Improvement in Survival over Time.

Authors:  Christine D M Roelofsen; Annemijn P A Wierenga; Sjoerd van Duinen; Robert M Verdijk; Jaco Bleeker; Marina Marinkovic; Gregorius P M Luyten; Martine J Jager
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2020-12-15

2.  Impact of staging on survival outcomes: a nationwide real-world cohort study of metastatic uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Elina S Rantala; Tero T Kivelä; Micaela M Hernberg
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Clinical determinants of long-term survival in metastatic uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Elias A T Koch; Anne Petzold; Anja Wessely; Edgar Dippel; Michael Erdmann; Lucie Heinzerling; Bettina Hohberger; Harald Knorr; Ulrike Leiter; Friedegund Meier; Peter Mohr; Farnaz Rahimi; Beatrice Schell; Max Schlaak; Patrick Terheyden; Beatrice Schuler-Thurner; Selma Ugurel; Jochen Utikal; Julio Vera; Michael Weichenthal; Fabian Ziller; Carola Berking; Markus V Heppt
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 6.630

Review 4.  The Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Analysis of Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Management of Uveitis and Uveal Melanoma: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Arshpreet Bassi; Saffire H Krance; Aidan Pucchio; Daiana R Pur; Rafael N Miranda; Tina Felfeli
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-30

5.  Clinical features and survival outcomes of ocular melanoma in a multi-ethnic Asian cohort.

Authors:  Laura Ling Ying Tan; Jiancheng Hong; Wei Lin Goh; Esther Wei Yin Chang; Valerie Shiwen Yang; Eileen Poon; Nagavalli Somasundaram; Mohamad Farid; Anita Sook Yee Chan; Jason Yongsheng Chan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Melphalan in Patients with Unresectable Ocular Melanoma Metastases Confined to the Liver: A Prospective Phase II Study.

Authors:  T Susanna Meijer; Mark C Burgmans; Eleonora M de Leede; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Bas Boekestijn; Henricus J M Handgraaf; Denise E Hilling; Jacob Lutjeboer; Jaap Vuijk; Christian H Martini; Arian R van Erkel; Rutger W van der Meer; Fred G J Tijl; Frank M Speetjens; Ellen Kapiteijn; Alexander L Vahrmeijer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Early detection of metastatic uveal melanoma by the analysis of tumor-specific mutations in cell-free plasma DNA.

Authors:  Claudia H D Le Guin; Norbert Bornfeld; Nikolaos E Bechrakis; Leyla Jabbarli; Heike Richly; Dietmar R Lohmann; Michael Zeschnigk
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.452

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.