| Literature DB >> 30066825 |
Mariana de Santis Filgueiras1, Sarah Aparecida Vieira1, Andréia Queiroz Ribeiro1, Juliana Farias de Novaes1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between family history and the presence of dyslipidemia in children.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30066825 PMCID: PMC6362368 DOI: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2019;37;1;00005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Paul Pediatr ISSN: 0103-0582
Figure 1:Schematic representation of the data collection and the study sample.
Changes in the lipid profile according to family history of dyslipidemia in children.
| Total | Family history of dyslipidemia | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
| ↑TC (≥150 mg/dL) | ||||
| Yes | 193 (75.1) | 47 (24.4) | 146 (75.6) | 0.235 |
| No | 64 (24.9) | 11 (17.2) | 53 (82.8) | |
| ↓HDL-c (<45 mg/dL) | ||||
| Yes | 87 (33.9) | 25 (28.7) | 62 (71.3) | 0.091 |
| No | 170 (66.1) | 33 (19.4) | 137 (80.6) | |
| ↑LDL-c (≥100 mg/dL) | ||||
| Yes | 145 (56.4) | 35 (24.1) | 110 (75.9) | 0.493 |
| No | 112 (43.6) | 24 (20.5) | 88 (79.5) | |
| ↑TG (≥100 mg/dL) | ||||
| Yes | 29 (11.3) | 15 (51.7) | 14 (48.3) | <0.001* |
| No | 228 (88.7) | 44 (19.3) | 184 (80.7) | |
TC: total cholesterol; HDL-c: high density lipoprotein; LDL-c: low density lipoprotein; TG: triglyceride; Pearson’s chi square test; *p<0.05.
Lipid profile markers according to family history of dyslipidemia in children.
| Total | Family history of dyslipidemia | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n=257) | Yes (n=59) | No (n=198) | ||
| Mean±SD | Mean±SD | Mean±SD | ||
| TC (mg/dL) | 166.8±26.1 | 174.0±31.1 | 164.6±24.2 | 0.016* |
| HDL-c (mg/dL) | 50.8±11.5 | 49.7±12.6 | 51.1±11.2 | 0.445 |
| LDL-c (mg/dL) | 103.1±23.1 | 108.1±26.6 | 101.6±21.8 | 0.059 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 64.9±29.6 | 80.8±37.6 | 60.2±25.1 | <0.001* |
| CT/HDL-c | 3.4±0.8 | 3.6±0.9 | 3.3±0.8 | 0.010* |
| LDL-c/HDL-c | 2.1±0.7 | 2.3±0.7 | 2.1±0.7 | 0.051 |
| TG/HDL-c | 1.4±0.9 | 1.8±1.1 | 1.3±0.7 | 0.002* |
SD: standard deviation; TC: total cholesterol; HDL-c: high density lipoprotein; LDL-c: low density lipoprotein; TG: triglyceride; Student’s t test; *p<0.05.
Figure 2:Lipid profile markers in accordance with family history of dyslipidemia.
Crude and adjusted prevalence ratios of changes in lipid profile according to family history of dyslipidemia in children.
| Family history of dyslipidemia | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| No history | Mother or father | Mother and father | |
| ↑TC (≥150 mg/dL) | |||
| PR (95%CI) crude | 1.00 | 1.09 (0.93-1.27) | 1.16 (0.90-1.48) |
| p-value | - | 0.29 | 0.25 |
| PR (95%CI) adjusted | 1.00 | 1.10 (0.95-1.29) | 1.17 (0.91-1.50) |
| p-value | - | 0.21 | 0.21 |
| ↓HDL-c (<45 mg/dL) | |||
| PR (95%CI) crude | 1.00 | 1.27 (0.82-1.96) | 1.42 (0.66-3.06) |
| p-value | - | 0.29 | 0.37 |
| PR (95%CI) adjusted | 1.00 | 1.20 (0.77-1.88) | 1.42 (0.69-2.93) |
| p-value | - | 0.41 | 0.35 |
| ↑LDL-c (≥100 mg/dL) | |||
| PR (95%CI) crude | 1.00 | 1.04 (0.79-1.37) | 1.53 (1.17-2.00) |
| p-value | - | 0.78 | <0.01 |
| PR (95%CI) adjusted | 1.00 | 1.03 (0.78-1.37) | 1.52 (1.18-1.97) |
| p-value | - | 0.81 | <0.01 |
| ↑TG (≥100 mg/dL) | |||
| PR (95%CI) crude | 1.00 | 2.58 (1.18-5.63) | 5.47 (2.23-13.45) |
| p-value | - | 0.02* | <0.001 |
| PR (95%CI) adjusted | 1.00 | 2.43 (1.12-5.27) | 5.62 (2.27-13.92) |
| p-value | - | 0.02* | <0.001 |
Adjusted for age, gender, and nutritional status; TC: total cholesterol; HDL-c: high density lipoprotein; LDL-c: low density lipoprotein; TG: triglyceride; PR: prevalence ratio; 95%CI: confidence interval of 95%; Hosmer-Lemeshow test (Goodness of fit test); p>0.05.