Sinésio Talhari1,2, Bernardo Gontijo3, Everton Carlos Siviero do Vale4, Silvio Alencar Marques5. 1. Discipline of Dermatology, Universidade Nilton Lins, Manaus (AM), Brazil. 2. Post-Graduation Program of the Fundação de Medicina Tropical and Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus (AM), Brazil. 3. Dermatology Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (MG), Brazil. 4. Discipline of Dermatology, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (MG), Brazil. 5. Department of Dermatology, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu (SP), Brazil.
We recently sent a letter to heads of services accredited by our Society with general
information about the Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia (ABD), the new section on
infectious/parasitic diseases and our efforts to increase the impact factor, promote
higher visibility and better classification among the main international dermatologic
journals. Currently, we occupy the 54th position among the 62 dermatology
journals indexed worldwide. We are ahead of Annales de Dermatologie et de
Vénéréologie, and Leprosy Review. We
can improve with the collaboration of all. We are among the three largest dermatology
societies in the world.We would like to thank all colleagues that participated with responses and
suggestions.Among the correspondences sent to the heads of dermatology services, Dr. Jaison Barreto,
expressed concerns and critiques regarding the performance of the editors and the
quality of the articles published, especially on Hansen’s disease, the article of
Continuing Medical Education in particular.[1]Dr. Laila de Laguiche, in another correspondence, criticizes the Editorial of the same
journal number. In that Editorial, attention is drawn to the CME article and
possibilities of changes in the therapeutic scheme for Hansen’s disease.In this number of the ABD, we transcribed the texts sent by Dr. Jaison Barreto and Dr.
Laila de Laguiche, and the reply of the authors of the CME article.We believe the reply of the CME article’s authors are enough to explain the Editorial’s
reasons and we will let our colleagues who work with Hansen’s disease be the judges of
the quality of the articles published in our journal.