| Literature DB >> 30066722 |
Guoxian Huang1, Lili Ma1, Yonglong Wu1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to discuss the curative effect of applying "capsule-reserved normal saline bag and self-made hemi-spherical cushion oppression" for treating giant omphaloceles. Twelve patients with giant omphaloceles who were admitted to our hospital between January 2008 and June 2016 were selected for treatment as follows: a capsule-reserved normal saline bag was used to promote the gradual return of the abdominal contents into the abdominal cavity in phase I, and a self-made hemi-spherical cushion was used for compression combined with a local dressing change in phase II to treat the giant omphaloceles without surgical treatment. All 12 patients in this group were cured, and after follow-up visits for >10 months, they had no abdominal infections, wound disruption, intestinal obstruction, or other complications, and their growth was normal. Two patients had abdominal hernias, and they recovered after herniorrhaphies. Giant omphaloceles in newborns were treated in stages, and in phase II, non-surgical treatment was applied, which was easily performed with a smaller wound, low cost, an obvious curative effect, and higher safety and effectiveness.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30066722 PMCID: PMC6075798 DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X20187380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res ISSN: 0100-879X Impact factor: 2.590
Figure 1.Local compression with self-made hemi-spherical gauze cushion to promote return of bulged organs into the abdominal cavity. A: A patient with giant omphalocele; B: Omphalotaxis with silica gel bag in phase I; C, D: Local compression with self-made hemi-spherical gauze cushion and elastic bellyband to promote the return of organs.
Characteristics of 12 patients with giant umbilical bulging.
| No. | Gender | Age (h) | Weight (g) | Apgar (points) | Abdominal wall defect size (cm × cm) | Associated malformation | Surgery complications | Follow-up time (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Male | 4.5 | 2560 | 8–10–10 | 6 × 5 | Atrial septal defect / Inguinal hernia | Abdominal hernia | 77 |
| 2 | Male | 10 | 2850 | 10–10–10 | 6.5 × 5 | Inguinal hernia | 72 | |
| 3 | Male | 8 | 2960 | 10–10–10 | 6 × 5 | Cryptorchidism | 70 | |
| 4 | Male | 1 | 2150 | 7–9–10 | 5 × 5 | Atrial septal defect / Cryptorchidism | 66 | |
| 5 | Male | 3 | 2380 | 10–10–10 | 5.5 × 5 | Hypospadias / cryptorchidism | 57 | |
| 6 | Male | 2 | 3050 | 10–10–10 | 7 × 6 | Abdominal hernia | 46 | |
| 7 | Female | 14 | 2230 | 9–10–10 | 6 × 5 | Atrial septal defect | 37 | |
| 8 | Male | 2 | 3150 | 10–10–10 | 6 × 6 | Inguinal hernia | 32 | |
| 9 | Male | 6 | 2710 | 10–10–10 | 6 × 5 | 26 | ||
| 10 | Female | 3.5 | 2460 | 8–9–10 | 5 × 5 | Atrial septal defect | 18 | |
| 11 | Female | 4 | 2610 | 10–10–10 | 5 × 5 | Cryptorchidism | 16 | |
| 12 | Male | 2 | 2980 | 10–10–10 | 6 × 5 | Hypospadias / Inguinal hernia | 10 |
Figure 2.Comparison of effect on healing via operative treatment (A), and local compression (B) in phase II.