Jehan AlHumaid1, Fahad A Al Harbi2, Abeer E ElEmbaby3. 1. Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 2. Department of Substitutive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 3. Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; Department of Conservative Dentistry College of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Phone: +96638574928, e-mail: aeelembaby@uod.edu.sa.
Abstract
AIM: The present randomized clinical study compared the 18 months performance of self-adhering flowable composite with a conventional flowable composite in anterior Class V restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Totally, 20 patients, each with two moderate cervical carious lesions, participated in this single-center study. Forty restorations were allocated on a random basis by one examiner not involved in the restoration or the evaluation procedures, In each patient, one lesion was allocated to be restored using self-adhering flowable composite [Fusio liquid dentin (FL)] and the other to be restored using conventional flowable composite [Tetric Flow (FF)]. The allocation sequence of the restorations was concealed from the operator in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed, and stapled envelopes. An operator restored all the preparations in accordance to the manufacturer's instructions. Finishing and polishing of the restorations were done immediately after placement. Evaluation of the restorations was done in accordance to the United States Public Health Services (USPHS), modified Ryge criteria. Statistical analysis was completed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 (IBM Product, Chicago, USA). RESULTS: One case could not be reassessed at 18 months follow-up in both groups. No significant differences were detected between the tested materials from baseline to those of 18 months using the modified USPHS criteria. CONCLUSION: Self-adhering flowable composite exhibited acceptable clinical performance comparable with the conventional flow-able composite in anterior Class V restorations over an 18-month period. Nevertheless, the findings of this study must be validated by a longer clinical study. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Self-adhering flowable composite exhibited clinical performance comparable with the conventional flowable composite in Class V restoration.
RCT Entities:
AIM: The present randomized clinical study compared the 18 months performance of self-adhering flowable composite with a conventional flowable composite in anterior Class V restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Totally, 20 patients, each with two moderate cervical carious lesions, participated in this single-center study. Forty restorations were allocated on a random basis by one examiner not involved in the restoration or the evaluation procedures, In each patient, one lesion was allocated to be restored using self-adhering flowable composite [Fusio liquid dentin (FL)] and the other to be restored using conventional flowable composite [Tetric Flow (FF)]. The allocation sequence of the restorations was concealed from the operator in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed, and stapled envelopes. An operator restored all the preparations in accordance to the manufacturer's instructions. Finishing and polishing of the restorations were done immediately after placement. Evaluation of the restorations was done in accordance to the United States Public Health Services (USPHS), modified Ryge criteria. Statistical analysis was completed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 (IBM Product, Chicago, USA). RESULTS: One case could not be reassessed at 18 months follow-up in both groups. No significant differences were detected between the tested materials from baseline to those of 18 months using the modified USPHS criteria. CONCLUSION: Self-adhering flowable composite exhibited acceptable clinical performance comparable with the conventional flow-able composite in anterior Class V restorations over an 18-month period. Nevertheless, the findings of this study must be validated by a longer clinical study. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Self-adhering flowable composite exhibited clinical performance comparable with the conventional flowable composite in Class V restoration.
Entities:
Keywords:
Class V; Clinical performance; Flowable composite Self-adhering composite.