| Literature DB >> 30066666 |
Hong-Bo Liu1, Ran Wei2, Xue-Bing Ni1, Yuan-Chun Zheng3, Qiu-Bo Huo3, Bao-Gui Jiang1, Lan Ma1, Rui-Ruo Jiang1, Jin Lv4, Yun-Xi Liu5, Fang Yang6, Yun-Huan Zhang6, Jia-Fu Jiang1, Na Jia1, Wu-Chun Cao1.
Abstract
Northeastern China is a region of high tick abundance, multiple tick-borne pathogens and likely human infections. The spectrum of diseases caused by tick-borne pathogens has not been objectively evaluated in this region for clinical management and for comparison with other regions globally where tick-transmitted diseases are common. Based on clinical symptoms, PCR, indirect immunofluorescent assay and (or) blood smear, we identified and described tick-borne diseases from patients with recent tick bite seen at Mudanjiang Forestry Central Hospital. From May 2010 to September 2011, 42% (75/180) of patients were diagnosed with a specific tick-borne disease, including Lyme borreliosis, tick-borne encephalitis, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, human babesiosis and spotted fever group rickettsiosis. When we compared clinical and laboratory features to identify factors that might discriminate tick-transmitted infections from those lacking that evidence, we revealed that erythema migrans and neurological manifestations were statistically significantly differently presented between those with and without documented aetiologies (P < 0.001, P = 0.003). Twelve patients (6.7%, 12/180) were co-infected with two tick-borne pathogens. We demonstrated the poor ability of clinicians to identify the specific tick-borne disease. In addition, it is necessary to develop specific laboratory assays for optimal diagnosis of tick-borne diseases.Entities:
Keywords: China; co-infection; etiology; tick bite; tick-borne infectious disease
Year: 2018 PMID: 30066666 DOI: 10.1017/S0031182018001178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasitology ISSN: 0031-1820 Impact factor: 3.234