Literature DB >> 30066254

Thinking in 3D: a future for dialysis?

Giorgina Barbara Piccoli1,2.   

Abstract

A recent paper, entitled "Validation of an effective, low cost, free/open access 3D-printed stethoscope", recently appeared on PLoS One, reports on the validation of a 3D-printed stethoscope that costs about 100 times less than the classic Littman most of us carry in our pockets. The stethoscope model, called Glia, can be downloaded for free. This unusual paper may deepened our understanding of inequalities in health care around the world, but may also show how much we can learn from the inventive approaches employed by colleagues struggling to provide health care when they literally have nothing. Teaching students to monitor heart auscultation with an inexpensive, well-functioning 3D-printed stethoscope can be a lesson in creating a better world. Furthermore, the article reminds that good research can be done without sponsorship. The study design is clear; the methods are reproducible; validation is up to us. At a time in which we may have to re-think our complex relationship with the medical industry, this paper underlines the importance of intellectual independence. Will the 3D-printer bring a wind of innovation to our practice? Will it contribute to the development of low-cost artificial kidneys? These are good questions, still without answers. For now, we might limit to one first, basic question: are we ready for 3D thinking?

Keywords:  Cost; Ecology; Health care; Technology

Year:  2018        PMID: 30066254     DOI: 10.1007/s40620-018-0520-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nephrol        ISSN: 1121-8428            Impact factor:   3.902


  2 in total

Review 1.  Sister Earth, Our Common Home: Toward a Sustainable, Planet Friendly Approach to Dialysis, a Paradigm of High Technology Medicine.

Authors:  Giorgina Barbara Piccoli; David Mery
Journal:  J Ren Nutr       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.655

2.  Validation of an effective, low cost, Free/open access 3D-printed stethoscope.

Authors:  Alexander Pavlosky; Jennifer Glauche; Spencer Chambers; Mahmoud Al-Alawi; Kliment Yanev; Tarek Loubani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  What would you like to print? Students' opinions on the use of 3D printing technology in medicine.

Authors:  Renata Wilk; Wirginia Likus; Andrzej Hudecki; Marita Syguła; Aleksandra Różycka-Nechoritis; Konstantinos Nechoritis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.