| Literature DB >> 30065824 |
Yuanpei Gao1, Hideto Fukushima2, Shanggui Deng3, Ru Jia1, Kazufumi Osako1, Emiko Okazaki1.
Abstract
Several kinds of emulsified surimi gels were prepared from different quality levels of Alaska Pollack surimi, and the relationship between the emulsifying stability (ES) of myofibrillar protein and the properties of the emulsified surimi gels was investigated. Fish oil emulsified into surimi gels enhanced the breaking strength, but this was decreased by denaturation of the surimi protein, and the rate of enhanced gel-forming ability with emulsification decreased with decreasing ES. Expressible drip also decreased with emulsification; however, increasing amounts of lipid in the expressible drip were separated out from the gel upon protein denaturation of the source surimi. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the shape of fish oil particles became irregular and some voids caused by oil leakage were observed with increasing storage period of source surimi. The results suggested that improvement in gel properties of the emulsified surimi gels was correlated with ES as well as the level of protein denaturation.Entities:
Keywords: emulsification; fish oil; gel property; microstructure observation; surimi gel
Year: 2018 PMID: 30065824 PMCID: PMC6060893 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.663
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1Flowsheet of the experiment design
Ingredients of surimi gels (g)
| Surimi | IEW | NaCl | Fish oil | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 544 | 240 | 16 | 0 | 800 |
| Emulsified A | 544 | 160 | 16 | 80 | 800 |
| Emulsified B | 544 | 240 | 16 | 80 | 880 |
Same protein concentration with control, but different protein/moisture ratio.
Same protein/moisture ratio with control.
Proximate composition of surimi gels (g/100 g)
| Moisture | Crude protein | Crude lipid | Others | Protein/Moisture | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 80.4 ± 0.9a | 11.1 ± 0.4a | 0.5 ± 0.02c | 7.5 ± 0.4a | 0.14 ± 0.1b |
| Emulsified A | 70.3 ± 1.1c | 11.6 ± 0.3a | 10.3 ± 0.8a | 7.8 ± 0.3a | 0.17 ± 0.1a |
| Emulsified B | 72.9 ± 0.2b | 10.1 ± 0.3b | 9.0 ± 0.3b | 6.8 ± 0.1b | 0.14 ± 0.1b |
Values are given as means ± SD.
Different superscripts in the same column indicate significant differences (p < .05).
Figure 2ES, Ca2+‐ATPase activity, and solubility of Mf protein at different storage periods after thawing. Bars represent the standard deviations
Figure 3Breaking strength and breaking strain of surimi gels prepared from surimi exposed to different storage periods after thawing. Bars represent the standard deviations and different letters at the same heating conditions indicate significant differences (p < .05)
Increasing ratea of breaking strength of emulsified gels compared to the control gel (%)
| Storage period of source surimi | Emulsified A | Emulsified B | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct heating | Two‐step heating | Direct heating | Two‐step heating | |
| 0 days | 47.14 | 24.62 | 16.41 | 6.37 |
| 3 days | 35.20 | 8.80 | 12.23 | −13.92 |
| 5 days | 29.31 | 5.35 | 8.56 | −30.01 |
(Breaking strength of emulsified group − Breaking strength of control)/Breaking strength of control.
Figure 4Expressible moisture and lipid of surimi gels prepared from surimi exposed to different storage periods after thawing. Bars represent the standard deviations and different letters within the same heating conditions indicate significant differences (p < .05)
Figure 5Rheological properties of surimi paste prepared with surimi exposed to different storage periods after thawing. Letter a–c and d–f reveal elastic modulus (G′) and viscous modulus (G″), respectively. C, Control group; A, Emulsified A group; B, Emulsified B group; Number, Storage period of source surimi after thawing
Figure 6SEM observation of surimi gels prepared from surimi exposed to different storage periods after thawing. With 10 k magnification