| Literature DB >> 30065818 |
Jaspher Okello1,2, John B L Okullo2, Gerald Eilu2, Philip Nyeko2, Joseph Obua2.
Abstract
The relationships between the physicochemical composition of Tamarindus indica pulp and seeds, and agro-ecological zones and land use types were assessed in Uganda. The objective was to determine the relationship between the physicochemical composition, agro-ecological zones, and land use types. The samples were processed by manually depulping the T. indica pods, sun-drying the pulp and seeds, and grinding into powder. The powdered samples were analyzed for β-carotenoids, vitamin C (ascorbic acid), calorific value, crude oil, acid, and peroxide values. Data were analyzed using ANOVA in the general linear model (GLM). Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to relate the physicochemical properties to the agro-ecological zones and land use types. There were significant differences (p ≤ .05) in the physicochemical composition variables between agro-ecological zones and land use types. Land use types showed strong correlations with physicochemical properties while agro-ecological zones did not show correlations. The results show that in terms of general properties, T. indica pods provide a valuable, rich, and exceptional source of vitamin C, compared to many widely consumed indigenous and conventional fruits and vegetables. The pods from land use types characterized by natural habitats had relatively more nutrient levels than the land use types influenced by anthropogenic activities.Entities:
Keywords: Tamarindus indica; agro‐ecological zones; land use types; on‐farm; physicochemical composition; tamarind
Year: 2018 PMID: 30065818 PMCID: PMC6060884 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.627
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1Map of Uganda showing agro‐ecological zones and sample sites
Physicochemical composition of Tamarindus indica pulp from different agro‐ecological zones and land use types in Uganda
| Nutrients | Agro‐ecological zones (mg/100 g) | Land use types | Agro‐ecological zones × Land use types |
| SE Value | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| West Nile AEZ | LVC AEZ | Eastern AEZ | Wild | On‐farm | LVC | LVC | East | East | WN | WN | AEZ | AEZ | |
| Vitamin C | 201.70 ± 0.02a | 138.40 ± 0.01b | 154.60 ± 0.03c | 189.40 ± 0.35a | 140.40 ± 0.21b | 140.50 | 136.30 | 157.80 | 151.40 | 270.00 | 133.30 | .001 | 4.514 |
| β‐Carotenoids | 0.16 ± 0.02a | 0.14 ± 0.02b | 0.17 ± 0.03c | 0.14 ± 0.03a | 0.17 ± 0.04b | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.21 | .001 | 0.001 |
The contents are expressed by the mean values ± SD for n = 3 and n = 2. AEZ, Agro‐ecological zone.
*Interactions between land use types and agro‐ecological zones with variables; same superscript letters within a row show no significant difference.
Physicochemical composition of Tamarindus indica seed from different agro‐ecological zones and land use types in Uganda
| Nutrients | Agro‐ecological zone (Contents/100 g) | Land use types | Agro‐ecological zones × Land use types |
| SE Value | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| West Nile AEZ | Lake Victoria Crescent AEZ physicochemical | Eastern AEZ | Wild | On‐farm | LVC | LVC | East | East | WN | WN | AEZ | AEZ | |
| Vitamin C | 103.20 ± 0.14a | 85.10 ± 0.70b | 104.80 ± 0.57a | 106.20 ± 1.00a | 89.20 ± 0.70b | 88.10 | 82.00 | 132.00 | 77.80 | 98.50 | 107.80 | .001 | 4.484 |
| β‐carotenoids | 0.13 ± 0.20a | 0.24 ± 0.12b | 0.33 ± 0.13c | 0.20 ± 0.02a | 0.27 ± 0.02b | 0.16 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.13 | 0.13 | .001 | 0.001 |
| Calorific value | 280.90 ± 1.07a | 265.00 ± 1.00b | 267.80 ± 2.05c | 269.00 ± 1.53a | 273.40 ± 0.84b | 257.70 | 272.30 | 272.00 | 263.40 | 277.20 | 284.60 | .001 | 0.026 |
| Acid value | 10.00 ± 1.50a | 19.30 ± 0.40b | 19.50 ± 0.31c | 18.80 ± 0.60a | 13.70 ± 0.36b | 23.00 | 15.50 | 25.10 | 13.80 | 8.40 | 11.70 | .001 | 0.029 |
| Peroxide value | 200.30 ± 0.80a | 235.10 ± 1.00b | 111.00 ± 0.53c | 208.80 ± 1.22a | 155.50 ± 1.04a | 353.80 | 116.40 | 148.00 | 74.10 | 124.80 | 275.90 | .001 | 0.008 |
The contents are expressed by the mean values ± SD for n = 3 and n = 2. AEZ, Agro‐ecological zone.
*Interactions between land use types and agro‐ecological zones with variables; same superscript letters within a row show no significant difference.
The PCA Eigenvectors for T. indica Pulp
| Variable | Principal component | |
|---|---|---|
| PC1 | PC2 | |
| Vitamin C |
|
|
| β‐carotenoids |
|
|
Bold letters signifies strong correlations.
The PCA Eigenvectors for T. indica Seed
| Variable | Principal Component | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
| Vitamin C | 0.134 |
|
|
| 0.070 |
| β‐carotenoids |
|
|
|
|
|
| Calorific value |
|
|
| 0.053 |
|
| Acid value |
| 0.147 | 0.416 | 0.428 |
|
| Peroxide value | 0.219 |
| 0.290 |
|
|
Bold letters signifies strong correlations. Correlations above 0.5 is deemed important.
Figure 2Principal component analysis for T. indica pulp samples
Figure 3Principal component analysis for T. indica seed samples