| Literature DB >> 30065756 |
Fozia Batool1, Jamshed Akbar1, Shahid Iqbal1, Sobia Noreen1, Syed Nasir Abbas Bukhari2.
Abstract
Reports about presence and toxicity of Cd2+ in different chemical industrial effluents prompted the researchers to explore some economical, rapid, sensitive, and accurate methods for its determination and removal from aqueous systems. In continuation of series of investigations, adsorption of Cd2+ onto the stem of Saccharum arundinaceum is proposed in the present work. Optimization of parameters affecting sorption potential of Cd2+ including pH, contact time, temperature, sorbent dose, and concentration of sorbate was carried out to determine best suited conditions for maximum removal of sorbate. To understand the nature of sorption process, linear and nonlinear forms of five sorption isotherms including Freundlich and Langmuir models were employed. Feasibility and viability of sorption process were evaluated by calculating kinetics and thermodynamics of the process, while error analysis suggested best fitted sorption model on sorption data. Thermodynamic studies demonstrated exothermic nature of reaction, while kinetic studies suggested pseudo-second order of reaction.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30065756 PMCID: PMC6051333 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3463724
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinorg Chem Appl Impact factor: 7.778
Figure 1Effect of pretreatment on adsorption capacity of Saccharum arundinaceum (0.1 M HCl and NaOH treated sorbent, 60 minutes time, and 60 ppm initial concentration).
Figure 2(a) SEM image of raw Saccharum arundinaceum at three different resolutions. (b) SEM image of base-treated Saccharum arundinaceum at three different resolutions. (c) SEM image of acid-treated Saccharum arundinaceum at three different resolutions.
Identified functional groups present in Saccharum arundinaceum by FTIR spectroscopy.
| Possible functional groups | Raw (cm−1) | Base treated (cm−1) | Acid treated (cm−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| –OH stretching | 3309–3751 | 3211–3400 | |
| =CH | 3294 | ||
| C–H | 2858–2918 (bifurcate) | 2910 | 2922 |
| C=O | |||
| Secondary amide | 1645 | 1608 | 1654.92 |
| –NH | |||
| C–O | 1107 | 1222 | |
| C–N | 1051 | 1056 | 1043 |
Thermodynamic parameters for adsorption of cadmium onto Saccharum arundinaceum.
| Parameters | Temperature (K) | Results |
|---|---|---|
| 293 | −591.24 | |
| ∆ | 303 | −612.34 |
| 313 | −633.44 | |
| 328 | −665.09 | |
| ∆ | 26.99 | |
| ∆ | 2.11 | |
| Sorption energy (kJ/mol) | 0.764 |
Linear and nonlinear parameters of isothermal models for sorption of Cd onto Saccharum arundinaceum
| Models | Linear method | Nonlinear method |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
|
| 9.4558 | 12.2001 |
|
| 2.42 | 3.0271 |
|
| 0.9446 | |
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| 48.309 | 48.0821 |
|
| 0.1446 | 0.1461 |
|
| 0.408 | 0.406 |
|
| 0.9958 | |
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| 0.6543 | 3.1816 |
|
| 34.3533 | 39.667 |
|
| 0.7912 | |
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| 264.39 | 161.8954 |
|
| 1.0227 | 0.38 |
|
| 0.9852 | |
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| 16.58 | 17.2006 |
|
| 1.1677 | 0.6631 |
|
| 0.9433 | |
Error functions for optimization of equilibrium isotherms.
| Error functions |
| ERRSQ/RSS | ARE | EABS | Chi-square ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Freundlich | 0.8092 | 0.0261 | −0.8917 | −1.9864 | 3.7154 |
| Langmuir | 0.9958 | 0.0060 | −1.2623 | −0.0054 | 0.0106 |
| Dubinin–Radushkevich | 0.0523 | 17.6722 | 26.6963 | 9.2320 | 4.9631 |
| Elovich | 0.9432 | 1.8130 | −196.878 | −3.9160 | 10.0831 |
| Temkin | 1 | 18.9131 | −0.0723 | −0.0055 | 0.6727 |
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| Freundlich | 0.9476 | 69.1613 | −4.9554 | −1.4878 | 40.3303 |
| Langmuir | 0.9893 | 14.0441 | 1.0363 | 0.6722 | 0.5029 |
| Dubinin–Radushkevich | 0.9148 | 166.7881 | 10.4851 | 9.4789 | 11.7308 |
| Elovich | 0.8354 | 1.0911 | 0.7977 | 5.3805 | 0.5322 |
| Temkin | 0.8359 | 766.4798 | 38.3613 | 49.2605 | 65.3952 |
Effect of interfering cations and anions on % adsorption of cadmium.
| Interfering cations | Effect on adsorption of Cd+2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Monovalent | K+1 | 0.958 |
| Bivalent | Ca+2 | 0.644 |
| Trivalent | Cr+3 | 0.491 |
|
| ||
| Interfering anions | Cl−1 | 0.945 |
| NO3 −1 | 0.881 | |
| SO4 −2 | 0.907 | |