| Literature DB >> 30065582 |
Weon Ju Lee1, Jun Hong Park1, Jun Young Kim1, Yong Hyun Jang1, Seok-Jong Lee1, Yong Jun Bang2, Jae Bok Jun2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microsporum gypseum has been isolated from South Korea since 1966. However, the incidence of M. gypseum infection is very low.Entities:
Keywords: Epidemiology; Microsporum gypseum; Tinea
Year: 2018 PMID: 30065582 PMCID: PMC6029965 DOI: 10.5021/ad.2018.30.4.427
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Dermatol ISSN: 1013-9087 Impact factor: 1.444
Fig. 1(A) Brownish, powdery or granular colony. (B) Fusiform symmetrical thin-walled macroconidia with 3 to 6 cells (Lactophenol cotton blue, ×200).
Fig. 2Annual incidence of Microsporum gypseum infection.
Chronological distribution of Microsporum gypseum infection according to age
| Period | Age group (yr) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~9 | 10~19 | 20~29 | 30~39 | 40~49 | 50~59 | 60~69 | 70~79 | 80~89 | |
| 1980s | 27 | 18 | 11 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990s | 25 | 8 | 3 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 2000s | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
| 2010s | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 2 |
| Total | 62 | 30 | 16 | 16 | 21 | 28 | 13 | 8 | 4 |
Chronological distribution of Microsporum gypseum infection according to month
| Period | Jan. | Feb. | Mar. | Apr. | May | Jun. | Jul. | Aug. | Sep. | Oct. | Nov. | Dec. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 7 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 17 | 5 | 9 | 4 |
| 1990s | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 2010s | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| Total | 16 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 18 | 32 | 33 | 16 | 25 | 17 |
Chronological distribution of Microsporum gypseum infection according to topography
| Period | Tinea manus | Tinea pedis | Tinea unguium | Tinea capitis | Tinea faciei | Tinea corporis | Tinea cruris |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 23 | 17 |
| 1990s | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 25 | 12 |
| 2000s | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 12 | 6 |
| 2010s | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 58 | 76 | 35 |
Sexual distribution of Microsporum gypseum infection according to topography
| Sex | Tinea manus | Tinea pedis | Tinea unguium | Tinea capitis | Tinea faciei | Tinea corporis | Tinea cruris | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 8 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 25 | 27 | 28 | 94 |
| Female | 5 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 33 | 49 | 7 | 104 |
| Total | 13 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 58 | 76 | 35 | 198 |
Fig. 3Chronological distribution of Microsporum gypseum infection according to sex.
Fig. 4Age distribution of Microsporum gypseum infection according to sex.
Monthly distribution of Microsporum gypseum infection according to topography
| Month | Tinea manus | Tinea pedis | Tinea unguium | Tinea capitis | Tinea faciei | Tinea corporis | Tinea cruris |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Feb. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| Mar. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Apr. | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| May | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
| Jun. | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Jul. | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 1 |
| Aug. | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 3 |
| Sep. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 16 | 11 |
| Oct. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 4 |
| Nov. | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 3 |
| Dec. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Total | 13 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 58 | 76 | 35 |
Age distribution of Microsporum gypseum infection according to topography
| Age group (yr) | Tinea manus | Tinea pedis | Tinea unguium | Tinea capitis | Tinea faciei | Tinea corporis | Tinea cruris |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 33 | 15 | 10 |
| 10~19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 14 |
| 20~29 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 |
| 30~39 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 |
| 40~49 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 3 |
| 50~59 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 2 |
| 60~69 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| 70~79 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| 80~89 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 58 | 76 | 35 |