Xian-Wan Jiang1, Jian-Zhong Ye1, Ya-Ting Li1, Lan-Juan Li1. 1. State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China.
Abstract
AIM: To assess the incidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients receiving direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA)-based therapy or interferon (IFN)-based therapy for hepatitis C and the effectiveness of preemptive anti-HBV therapy for preventing HBV reactivation. METHODS: The PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched, and 39 studies that reported HBV reactivation in HBV/hepatitis C virus coinfected patients receiving DAA-based therapy or IFN-based therapy were included. The primary outcome was the rate of HBV reactivation. The secondary outcomes included HBV reactivation-related hepatitis and the effectiveness of preemptive anti-HBV treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues. The pooled effects were assessed using a random effects model. RESULTS: The rate of HBV reactivation was 21.1% in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients receiving DAA-based therapy and 11.9% in those receiving IFN-based therapy. The incidence of hepatitis was lower in HBsAg-positive patients with undetectable HBV DNA compared to patients with detectable HBV DNA receiving DAA therapy (RR = 0.20, 95%CI: 0.06-0.64, P = 0.007). The pooled HBV reactivation rate in patients with previous HBV infection was 0.6% for those receiving DAA-based therapy and 0 for those receiving IFN-based therapy, and none of the patients experienced a hepatitis flare related to HBV reactivation. Preemptive anti-HBV treatment significantly reduced the potential risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-positive patients undergoing DAA-based therapy (RR = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.1-0.96, P = 0.042). CONCLUSION: The rate of HBV reactivation and hepatitis flare occurrence is higher in HBsAg-positive patients receiving DAA-based therapy than in those receiving IFN-based therapy, but these events occur less frequently in patients with previous HBV infection. Preemptive anti-HBV treatment is effective in preventing HBV reactivation.
AIM: To assess the incidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients receiving direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA)-based therapy or interferon (IFN)-based therapy for hepatitis C and the effectiveness of preemptive anti-HBV therapy for preventing HBV reactivation. METHODS: The PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched, and 39 studies that reported HBV reactivation in HBV/hepatitis C virus coinfectedpatients receiving DAA-based therapy or IFN-based therapy were included. The primary outcome was the rate of HBV reactivation. The secondary outcomes included HBV reactivation-related hepatitis and the effectiveness of preemptive anti-HBV treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues. The pooled effects were assessed using a random effects model. RESULTS: The rate of HBV reactivation was 21.1% in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients receiving DAA-based therapy and 11.9% in those receiving IFN-based therapy. The incidence of hepatitis was lower in HBsAg-positive patients with undetectable HBV DNA compared to patients with detectable HBV DNA receiving DAA therapy (RR = 0.20, 95%CI: 0.06-0.64, P = 0.007). The pooled HBV reactivation rate in patients with previous HBV infection was 0.6% for those receiving DAA-based therapy and 0 for those receiving IFN-based therapy, and none of the patients experienced a hepatitis flare related to HBV reactivation. Preemptive anti-HBV treatment significantly reduced the potential risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-positive patients undergoing DAA-based therapy (RR = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.1-0.96, P = 0.042). CONCLUSION: The rate of HBV reactivation and hepatitis flare occurrence is higher in HBsAg-positive patients receiving DAA-based therapy than in those receiving IFN-based therapy, but these events occur less frequently in patients with previous HBV infection. Preemptive anti-HBV treatment is effective in preventing HBV reactivation.
Authors: V Calvaruso; D Ferraro; A Licata; M G Bavetta; S Petta; F Bronte; G Colomba; A Craxì; V Di Marco Journal: J Viral Hepat Date: 2017-08-09 Impact factor: 3.728
Authors: Jeffrey D Stanaway; Abraham D Flaxman; Mohsen Naghavi; Christina Fitzmaurice; Theo Vos; Ibrahim Abubakar; Laith J Abu-Raddad; Reza Assadi; Neeraj Bhala; Benjamin Cowie; Mohammad H Forouzanfour; Justina Groeger; Khayriyyah Mohd Hanafiah; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Spencer L James; Jennifer MacLachlan; Reza Malekzadeh; Natasha K Martin; Ali A Mokdad; Ali H Mokdad; Christopher J L Murray; Dietrich Plass; Saleem Rana; David B Rein; Jan Hendrik Richardus; Juan Sanabria; Mete Saylan; Saeid Shahraz; Samuel So; Vasiliy V Vlassov; Elisabete Weiderpass; Steven T Wiersma; Mustafa Younis; Chuanhua Yu; Maysaa El Sayed Zaki; Graham S Cooke Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Anna Szymanek-Pasternak; Krzysztof A Simon; Sylwia Serafińska; Justyna Janocha-Litwin; Monika Pazgan-Simon; Grzegorz Madej Journal: Clin Exp Hepatol Date: 2016-11-28
Authors: Muzammil M Khan; Mukarram J Ali; Hira Hanif; Muhammad H Maqsood; Imama Ahmad; Javier E G Alvarez; Maria-Andreea Catana; Daryl T Y Lau Journal: Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) Date: 2022-05-26
Authors: Massimo Giuseppe Colombo; Erkin Isakovich Musabaev; Umed Yusupovich Ismailov; Igor A Zaytsev; Alexander V Nersesov; Igor Anatoliyevich Anastasiy; Igor Alexandrovich Karpov; Olga A Golubovska; Kulpash S Kaliaskarova; Ravishankar Ac; Sanjay Hadigal Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 5.742