Literature DB >> 30065491

New Advances in Emergency Ultrasound Protocols for Shock.

Jen-Tang Sun1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Point of care ultrasound; Shock; Ultrasound

Year:  2017        PMID: 30065491      PMCID: PMC6029327          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmu.2017.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ultrasound        ISSN: 0929-6441


× No keyword cloud information.
Shock is a major morbidity in emergency and critical care and is also one of the important prognostic factors affecting in-hospital mortality [1]. Timely diagnosis and treatment of shock reduce the length of stay (LOS) and mortality rate at the emergency department (ED). The early use of the point of care ultrasound (POCUS) can reduce the diagnostic time as well as increase the accuracy of diagnosis [2]. The first protocol Undifferentiated hypotension protocol (UHP) was release on 2001, [3]; and more than 15 subsequent protocols were developed [4]. Most protocols include followings:

Heart

Evaluate the common causes of shock and heart function. During POCUS exam, we emphasize on “eye balling”, instead of conventional measurements.

Obstructive shock

Pericardial effusion with cardiac tamponade

Use subcostal view as first screen view. Effusion in the pericardial cavity is usually visible (Fig. 1). Moreover, Right atrium or Right ventricle (RV) collapse sign is specific for cardiac tamponade (Fig. 2). As we mention earlier, conventional measurement is not necessary in POCUS, if patient develops clinical shock status with pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade should be considered.
Figure 1

Pericardial effusion.

Figure 2

RA collapse sign.

Pericardial effusion. RA collapse sign.

Pulmonary embolism

Apical four chamber view is much more accurate for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism; it provides better visualization of both heart ventricles; in pulmonary embolism, RV is obviously larger than left ventricle (LV) (normal ratio is RV:LV = 1:1.5) (Fig. 3). In parasternal short axis view, a D-shape LV (Septal wall shifts toward LV second to pulmonary hypertension) can be found. RV wall thickness is usually <0.5cm in acute condition; if not, it is usually caused by other chronic condition, such as primary pulmonary hypertension. The presentation of McConnell’s sign demonstrates the akinesia of mid RV free wall, but good motion of RV apex.
Figure 3

Pulmonary embolism.

Pulmonary embolism.

Cardiogenic shock

Parasternal short axis view is used for LV contractility and coronary artery supply in different territory. The LV will move inward about 30% to 1/3 during contraction (Fig. 4). The presentation of limited LV contraction could be cardiogenic shock, meanwhile, the occurrence of abnormal motion of regional wall reflects the abnormality of coronary arterial territory.
Figure 4

Normal LV contraction.

Normal LV contraction.

Hypovolemic shock

Kissing sign (the different walls contact each other during contraction) occurs in hypovolemic shock. It is important to evaluate RV condition and end diastolic volume whenever Kissing sign in hypovolemic shock occurs. For example, pulmonary embolism can cause low volume to LV. In hypo-volemic shock, both end diastolic and systolic volume are reduced, but in distributive shock, only end systolic volume is reduced.

Blood vessels

Inferior vena cava (IVC)

The normal diameter at the end expiratory phase (IVCe) should be 1–2.5 cm, and diameter is reduced during end inspiratory phase (IVCi). The changing diameter of IVC during respiration can be used to calculate the caval index, (IVCe–IVCi)/IVCe × 100, with a normal range 40–50% (Fig. 5). A IVC diameter is currently used in two extreme conditions.
Figure 5

Size of IVCe and IVCi (from AJEM 2013; 31:763–767).

Size of IVCe and IVCi (from AJEM 2013; 31:763–767).

Hypovolemic shock

IVCe <1 cm and caval index >40–50%.

Obstructive shock/cardiogenic shock

IVCe >2.5 cm. In addition, the IVC diameter for fluid responsiveness may be more complicated, especially in patients under mechanical ventilation.

Aorta

The ultrasound scan can effectively diagnose the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) larger then 5 cm, with good sensitivity (99%) and specificity (98%) (Fig. 6). Scan from the upper abdominal aorta to the iliac artery bifurcation is difficult to differentiate the rupture of the AAA or not; but AAA > 5 cm has more chance to be ruptured. Patient with shock and AAA > 5 cm is mostly due to ruptured AAA. In addition, check the aorta for flap to confirm the aortic dissection; it has moderate sensitivity (67–80%) and good specificity (94%) (Fig. 7).
Figure 6

AAA > 5 cm.

Figure 7

Intima flap over abdominal aorta.

AAA > 5 cm. Intima flap over abdominal aorta.

Femoral vein and popliteal vein

Deep vein thrombosis is one of the causes of PE. Compress the ultrasound probe on the femoral/popliteal vein. Normally, the veins can be compressed by the probe; and the occurrence of uncompressed veins indicate a positive finding of deep vein thrombosis (Fig. 8).
Figure 8

Deep vein thrombosis.

Deep vein thrombosis.

Abdomen

Check the hepatorenal/splenorenal junction and Douglas pouch for free fluid. If free fluid is present, internal bleeding should be considered (Fig. 9). Especially if homogenous echogenic substance occurs within free fluid.
Figure 9

Hemoperitoneum in Doglus pouch.

Hemoperitoneum in Doglus pouch.

Septic shock

Look for common sites of infection, for example, liver abscess and cholecystitis.

Lung

In tension pneumothorax, place the probe on highest area over chest for the absence of lung sliding sign and barcode sign (Fig. 10) and try to identify the lung point.
Figure 10

Barcode sign in pneumothorax.

Barcode sign in pneumothorax. Check the free fluid at the base of the lungs. Numerous B lines in bilateral lungs (Fig. 11).
Figure 11

Multiple B line (arrow) in cardiogenic shock.

Multiple B line (arrow) in cardiogenic shock.

Future and discussion

Most currently available protocols are focused on diagnosis. Blanco et al. suggested that an ultrasound scan should also assess the efficacy of treatment [5]. For example, the use of velocity time integral (VTI) of LVOT to measure the responses to fluid and inotropic agent to help further management. Point of care ultrasound is a powerful tool in emergency setting. The emergency ultrasound procedures for shock can reduce the LOS at the emergency department. Therefore, POCUS is an essential skill for personnels in the emergency department and critical care units.
  5 in total

1.  The UHP ultrasound protocol: a novel ultrasound approach to the empiric evaluation of the undifferentiated hypotensive patient.

Authors:  J S Rose; A E Bair; D Mandavia; D J Kinser
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.469

2.  Emergency department hypotension predicts sudden unexpected in-hospital mortality: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alan E Jones; Vasilios Yiannibas; Charles Johnson; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Rapid Ultrasound in Shock (RUSH) Velocity-Time Integral: A Proposal to Expand the RUSH Protocol.

Authors:  Pablo Blanco; Francisco Miralles Aguiar; Michael Blaivas
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Randomized, controlled trial of immediate versus delayed goal-directed ultrasound to identify the cause of nontraumatic hypotension in emergency department patients.

Authors:  Alan E Jones; Vivek S Tayal; D Matthew Sullivan; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 5.  Make it SIMPLE: enhanced shock management by focused cardiac ultrasound.

Authors:  Ka Leung Mok
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2016-08-15
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Accuracy of echocardiography and ultrasound protocol to identify shock etiology in emergency department.

Authors:  Asmaa Ramadan; Tamer Abdallah; Hassan Abdelsalam; Ahmed Mokhtar; Assem Abdel Razek
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2022-06-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.