| Literature DB >> 30065200 |
Xiuzhen Ding1, Xiangzhen Kong2, Yeming Chen3, Caimeng Zhang4, Yufei Hua5, Xiangyang Li6.
Abstract
A highly selective procedure to extract thiol-containing peptides (TCPs) from complicated soy glycinin hydrolysates (SGHs) was described. This procedure included the reduction of disulfide bonds by 1,4-dithiothreitol (DTT) and enrichment of TCPs through Thiopropyl-Sephrose 6B covalent chromatography. TCPs were confirmed using a strategy based on mass shift after differential alkylation of sulfhydryl groups with iodoacetamide and N-ethylmaleimide by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). The antioxidant activities of TCPs were evaluated using chemical assays. DTT reduction increased the concentration of sulfhydryl groups from 1.8 μmol/g to 113.8 μmol/g. The efficiency of the extraction was improved by optimizing the loading of sample, extraction and desorption time and the content of desorption reagent. Both of the adsorption and desorption process were found to fit a pseudo-second order model. MALDI-TOF-MS showed that 36 of the 45 extracted peptides were TCPs. The EC50 of TCPs for DPPH, hydroxyl radical, and superoxide anion radical was 0.1, 1.49 and 0.084 mg/mL, respectively. The reducing power of TCPs (0.2 mg/mL) was of 0.375. These results suggest that the combination of DTT reduction and Thiopropyl-Sepharose 6B covalent chromatograph was a successful pathway to extract TCPs from SGHs and the TCPs could be used as potential antioxidants.Entities:
Keywords: DTT reduction; Thiopropyl-Sephrose 6B covalent chromatography; antioxidant activities; thiol-containing peptides
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30065200 PMCID: PMC6222310 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23081909
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1(a) Effect of concentration of DTT on the sulfhydryl group content of SGHs; (b) Sephadex LH-20 profile of reduced SGHs.
Figure 2SEC-HPLC profile of reduced SGHs and TCPs. The Y axis was the absorbance of the elution at various wavelength and was omitted for the convenience of comparison between different compounds.
Figure 3(a) effect of dosage of SGHs on the capture of TCPs by Thiopropyl Sepharose 6B; (b) contact time curve of the capture of TCPs; (c) plots of the pseudo-second order linearized kinetic model for the capture of TCPs; (d) plots of the Weber-Morris intra-particle diffusion for the capture of TCPs.
Figure 4(a) Effect of concentration of DTT on the desorption yield of TCPs; (b) effect of incubating time on the desorption yield of TCPs; (c) plots of pseudo-second order kinetic model for the desorption of TCPs; (d) plots of the Weber-Morris intra-particle diffusion for the desorption of TCPs.
m/z of picks in MALDI-TOF-MS spectrum.
| Pick Number | IAM | NEM | Distance in | Content of Cys |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.774 | 198.769 | −0.005 | 0 |
| 2 | 274.156 | 274.149 | −0.007 | 0 |
| 3 | 284.22 | 284.222 | 0.002 | 0 |
| 4 | 312.92 | 312.911 | −0.009 | 0 |
| 5 | 318.22 | 318.202 | −0.018 | 0 |
| 6 | 833.497 | 833.4 | −0.097 | 0 |
| 7 | 905.439 | 905.408 | −0.032 | 0 |
| 8 | 992.494 | 992.485 | −0.009 | 0 |
| 9 | 1169.603 | 1169.569 | −0.033 | 0 |
| 10 | 249.849 | 318.202 | 68.353 | 1 |
| 11 | 315.021 | 383.135 | 68.113 | 1 |
| 12 | 335.026 | 403.133 | 68.106 | 1 |
| 13 | 482.176 | 550.227 | 68.051 | 1 |
| 14 | 517.18 | 585.244 | 68.064 | 1 |
| 15 | 559.205 | 627.266 | 68.061 | 1 |
| 16 | 713.328 | 781.374 | 68.046 | 1 |
| 17 | 765.341 | 833.408 | 68.068 | 1 |
| 18 | 777.363 | 845.422 | 68.059 | 1 |
| 19 | 799.351 | 867.417 | 68.066 | 1 |
| 20 | 815.341 | 883.404 | 68.063 | 1 |
| 21 | 821.341 | 889.402 | 68.061 | 1 |
| 22 | 864.424 | 932.471 | 68.047 | 1 |
| 23 | 910.428 | 978.458 | 68.031 | 1 |
| 24 | 921.453 | 989.523 | 68.069 | 1 |
| 25 | 928.422 | 996.486 | 68.064 | 1 |
| 26 | 940.452 | 1008.478 | 68.026 | 1 |
| 27 | 992.494 | 1060.551 | 68.056 | 1 |
| 28 | 1041.518 | 1109.589 | 68.071 | 1 |
| 29 | 1049.587 | 1117.515 | 67.928 | 1 |
| 30 | 1063.511 | 1131.587 | 68.076 | 1 |
| 31 | 1079.487 | 1147.567 | 68.081 | 1 |
| 32 | 1085.519 | 1153.529 | 68.01 | 1 |
| 33 | 1150.572 | 1218.581 | 68.009 | 1 |
| 34 | 1174.575 | 1242.592 | 68.017 | 1 |
| 35 | 1177.58 | 1245.652 | 68.072 | 1 |
| 36 | 1188.58 | 1256.645 | 68.065 | 1 |
| 37 | 1197.631 | 1265.685 | 68.055 | 1 |
| 38 | 1204.609 | 1272.617 | 68.008 | 1 |
| 39 | 1210.61 | 1278.59 | 67.981 | 1 |
| 40 | 1226.607 | 1294.613 | 68.006 | 1 |
| 41 | 1249.618 | 1317.626 | 68.008 | 1 |
| 42 | 713.328 | 849.39 | 136.063 | 2 |
| 43 | 921.453 | 1057.523 | 136.07 | 2 |
| 44 | 1049.587 | 1185.595 | 136.008 | 2 |
| 45 | 1125.593 | 1261.639 | 136.046 | 2 |
Antioxidant activities of TCPs.
| TCPs | Glutathione | |
|---|---|---|
| DPPH (mg/mL) A | 0.10 ± 0.004 a | 0.03 ± 0.001 b |
| Hydroxyl radical (mg/mL) | 1.49 ± 0.07 a | 0.36 ± 0.014 b |
| Superoxide anion radical (mg/mL) | 0.084 ± 0.004 a | 0.052 ± 0.003 b |
| Reducing power B | 0.38 ± 0.01 a | 0.57 ± 0.031 b |
Different superscript characters (a and b) indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 level within the same row. A EC50 B Sample concentration was 0.2 mg/mL for reducing power (OD 700 nm).